CALIFORNIA HAIRCUT LIFELINE California Offers Life-Saving Haircut to Its Bureaucracy and Retirees 💇‍♂️ CA's fiscal house is on fire: $1.37T in debt, $265B unfunded pensions (CalPERS ~$166B, CalSTRS ~$39B). Bold fix: Give every state/local employee, retiree, judge, and elected official a real choice: Option A: Take a guaranteed 40% cut to salary/pension (cash only). Option B: Keep 100% pay — but get 50% in 20-year CA bonds. Skin in the game! This turns bureaucrats & decision-makers into fiscal watchdogs. Voluntary. Market discipline. Long-term thinking. No more kicking the trillion-dollar can. Judges & politicians who opt in suddenly care if bonds go to zero. What do you think, CA? Time to align incentives?

Is there a fraction of the 300 million that are helped LESS by HR25 FAIRtax? Yes, but in the very short term. FAIRtax.org/faq

The WAY taxes are collected makes a big difference on productivity... Pass the FAIRTax Act of 2025. fairtax.org/

Economic illiteracy is a powerful tool of the left to whip up voter turnout.

We in the movement have GOT to find a way to get @RepBuddyCarter some support outside his district.

Why would ANYONE want to have their income seized before they can feed their family? HR25 FAIRtax is the fix. FAIRtax.org

An AFFT Board Member and PhD economist looks at REASONS why all political persuasions should support HR25 FAIRtax.

Really enjoy the Rumaniti posts...your writing is great..

The political class is big mad that a determined individual can outrun monetary debasement.

Elon Musk isn't stealing anything from me. The Government? Stealing quite a lot, actually.

This isn’t true. You got your wealth from @Qualcomm family connections. Let’s audit Qualcomm executives and see if your own family is paying what you ask others to pay. It starts with you! How did you get your money?

@realDonaldTrump @POTUS @VP @RepBaumgartner @GOP @elonmusk @DOGE @LeaderJohnThune @SpeakerJohnson

Do you anticipate any progress with HR25, The FAIRtax in this session of Congress? @RepBuddyCarter

I'm not an economist but I think Steve Hayes makes a profound observation with this. But I think a further point can be made... @Grok, if inflation is the opposite of deflation and if FAIRTax slows inflation by increasing productivity, does that make increased productivity synonymous with deflation? We've got something pretty special with HR25, The FAIRTax. It's time to get it passed.

America’s Hidden Labor Drain: The Jobs Crossing the Border Without Crossing the Border The central AGCL claim is that America’s labor problem is no longer limited to illegal immigration or work visas; it is the continuous export of American jobs through both physical labor importation and digital labor substitution. Under the current system, employers can suppress domestic wages not only by bringing workers into the country, but by sending work out of the country through the internet every day. AGCL identifies this as a structural labor-market distortion and responds through labor sovereignty rather than temporary policy adjustments. The American Gold Contract for Liberty framework treats labor as a strategic domestic resource whose pricing should be determined primarily by domestic supply and demand rather than global wage arbitrage. The modern economy allows a company in Chicago, Dallas, or Seattle to replace an American accountant, software developer, designer, engineer, customer-service representative, bookkeeper, or data analyst with labor sourced anywhere in the world. The worker never enters the United States, yet the economic effect can resemble importing labor. AGCL therefore classifies foreign remote labor as an imported service rather than treating it as an invisible transaction. Under Point 06, remote labor performed outside the United States for domestic benefit is subject to tariff treatment, removing the incentive to bypass American workers through digital channels. Under AGCL, wage restoration occurs through mechanical enforcement rather than political promises. Employers would compete for domestic workers because the structural advantages of labor substitution would be reduced. Higher wages would increase local purchasing power, strengthen transaction-based revenue systems, and circulate income through American communities instead of exporting purchasing power abroad. This reflects the AGCL principle of labor sovereignty, where productive velocity inside the nation replaces dependency on imported labor inputs. The immediate result would likely be higher labor costs and rapid automation, but the long-term result envisioned by AGCL is a labor market where Americans once again become the primary beneficiaries of American economic growth. Instead of competing against global labor pools subsidized by distance and technology, domestic workers would operate within a system designed to preserve pricing power, visible accountability, and citizen-taxpayer supremacy. The structural correction is not simply reducing immigration; it is ending the economic incentives that continuously move American jobs beyond American workers. blueprintliberty.com/point-6… blueprintliberty.com/the-enu… AGCL System | Learn More: fairtax.org blueprintliberty.com blueprintliberty.com/america… github.com/jhodges07/AGCL-Co… github.com/jhodges07/AGCL-Co… Use the AGCL GPT: chatgpt.com/g/g-69f78b012970…

"People who thought they’d never matter in the economy would suddenly be needed again."

Not everyone views themselves as helpless victims. That’s mostly a feature and necessity of socialism.

Providence spends almost $30,000 per student, and our public schools are still failing. The problem is not funding. The problem won't be solved with more taxes or another fund that pours more money into our broken system. The majority of our children cannot read or do math at a proficient level when they graduate, trapping our families, while the teachers who push ideology over education are protected. Providence cannot be handed over to performative outsiders looking to turn our city into an ideological experiment. We need #ProvidenceFirst WatersForMayor.com

@POTUS this is the fix for America Even illegals have to pay.

Aquí tienes una versión más sólida que incorpora los conceptos de la AGCL de manera más directa: Un mercado libre para la aplicación de derechos suena atractivo hasta que se plantea una pregunta sencilla: ¿quién hace cumplir a quienes hacen cumplir las normas? Si agencias de protección competidoras discrepan sobre un contrato, un reclamo de propiedad o un acto criminal, deben someterse a una autoridad legal común o resolver la disputa mediante la fuerza. En el momento en que la fuerza se convierte en el árbitro final, el mercado ya ha fracasado. La verdadera pregunta no es si existe autoridad. La verdadera pregunta es cómo se limita la autoridad. La AGCL lleva la limitación del gobierno tan lejos como es estructuralmente posible al imponer principios de libre mercado dentro del propio gobierno. Los programas gubernamentales deben operar con propiedad definida, autoridad definida, duración definida, rendición de cuentas definida y derechos de salida definidos. Se prohíbe la agrupación de recursos sin derechos de propiedad. Se prohíbe la participación sin derechos de salida. Se prohíbe la tributación basada simplemente en la existencia. Se prohíbe imponer deuda a las generaciones futuras sin protecciones de propiedad. Se prohíbe la autoridad sin fecha de expiración. El gobierno puede recaudar ingresos, pero la propiedad del contribuyente permanece visible y rastreable en todo el sistema. Los ciudadanos conservan la supremacía sobre sus dólares de impuestos mediante transparencia, clasificación constitucional, mecanismos de recuperación (clawback), redirección para reducción de deuda, protecciones de propiedad y responsabilidad pública. El objetivo es simple: Obligar al gobierno a obedecer los mismos principios que hacen funcionar a los mercados libres. Sin reglas, la fuerza reemplaza a los mercados. Sin límites, el gobierno reemplaza a los mercados. La AGCL busca la máxima seguridad práctica para la libertad al vincular la autoridad a los derechos de propiedad, la transparencia, los límites constitucionales, la expiración, la aplicación efectiva de las normas y los derechos de salida. La Supremacía del Ciudadano Contribuyente prevalece sobre la voluntad del gobierno. Lo que quede por hacer para la seguridad de la libertad, no lo sé. FairTax.org BlueprintLiberty.com