The same "progressive" politicians who got it horribly wrong about puberty blockers for kids and called you "transphobic" for voicing concerns about the welfare of children, also claim to be experts on Gaza and state that genocide has occurred, even though there is no credible or verifiable evidence of genocide. If you disagree with them about Gaza, you will likely be labelled a "genocide denier" or something similar.
The same "progressive" politicians who were wrong about puberty blockers and are wrong about Gaza, would also like you to believe your borders are well managed, that the system is working fine and "diversity is our strength". They will also label you "racist" and "far-right" if you happen to point at the elephant in the room or argue that social cohesion is actually our strength, whereas "diversity" of the woke identity politics variety, leads to social fragmentation and polarisation.
I could go on. For instance, there's the rape gang scandal and people looking the other way because of systemic wokeness and the fear of being labelled "racist". Or there's the security guard in England who didn't stop a suspicious individual - who turned out to be suicide bomber - because the security guard was afraid of being labelled "racist".
You may have detected a theme. All this and more has been brought to you by "progressive liberalism". That's who pushes woke identity politics at us and demonises anyone who dissents from their narrative. They lecture us about tolerance but yet they are intolerant of anyone who disagrees with them, or anyone who doesn't meekly fall into line.
It's hard not to see the similarities between the authoritarian nature of supposed progressive liberalism (they are actually regressive and illiberal) and some of the classic political cults of the twentieth century. Once you see it, once you become aware of it, the authoritarianism is hard to ignore. The cultish absolute certainty they are right and that anyone outside the cult is an obstacle in their daily pursuit of a progressive utopia.
At this point I am going to state what might already be obvious. There is not enough money in the world that could persuade me to vote for a politician who self-identifies as being a progressive liberal. Despite the similarity, progressive liberal is not the same thing as classical liberal. A classical liberal supports free speech, opposes intrusive 'big government' and has something of a live and let live approach regarding their fellow citizens, rather than trying to coerce people - such as not using legislation to coerce people to act in a manner that goes against their religious beliefs (for example a baker who doesn't want to put a particular message on a cake).
Progressive liberalism is not progressive or liberal. It is authoritarian socialism that has co-opted liberalism. If you are an actual liberal, then voting for a progressive liberal is like a turkey voting for Christmas.