X is for banter and non sequiturs. Occasionally serious. I do enjoy a good swear. PS I don’t respond to DMs unless it is from a mate, apologies. FSU.

Joined March 2022
449 Photos and videos
She said…what? retweeted
139 MPs want this man to use women’s toilets. Their names are linked in next post.
47
218
726
8,687
She said…what? retweeted
This is possibly the worst crime in modern history. Two men "adopted" a baby. "A post mortem examination identified more than 30 external bruises, as well as internal bruising to his mouth and throat, internal bruising to his anus, bowel and bladder, lacerations to his anorectum, and a perforated bowel." "One medical expert gave evidence that a bruise on the baby’s bottom appeared to be a human bite mark." Think what this poor baby went through. The men who did this should be put to death. Men should not be able to buy babies. I know that this will cause some anguish to good men who have good intentions, but it's necessary to prevent this happening. This cannot happen again.
1,392
4,424
16,764
416,598
She said…what? retweeted
BREAKING: The assisted suicide/euthanasia industry is about to announce that they are bringing back their Bill to Parliament. We MUST keep fighting. This Bill is an unprecedented danger to the elderly, disabled, and other vulnerable groups.
🌹A new assisted suicide Bill would mean: - DISTRACTION: of Govt from core issues - DIVISION: of already divided Party (42% of Labour MPs oppose Bill) - DISRUPTION: of Labour reset, under new or current leader - DEFEAT: only 12 MPs need change their mind; they likely already have
18
192
580
9,586
She said…what? retweeted
So the people responsible for publishing a document on a police website defending Hamas and denying many of the atrocities from Oct 7th are the same people advising the College of Policing. But there’s no bias within British policing…. Right? 🤔

12
664
2,074
21,442
She said…what? retweeted
The rest of the country isn’t grateful, Claire. The HoL did their jobs and you’re circumventing the law. All to give the government a cheaper option than palliative care. And no, the country doesn’t support this bill. Only old polls conducted by Dignity in Dying (the ones who poured millions into getting this done for the government) actually suggest that. A deeply dangerous bill that intends to remove safeguards in the coming years once it’s through the door is being forced AGAIN and refuses to ensure safeguarding. Anyone who gives a damn about people being able to make a decision on AD without coercion being a factor, will oppose this bill. Unfortunately, many will still back this bill because it’s the cheaper solution. They would rather let you, your loved ones suffer to the point of asking for AD rather than fund proper palliative care. That’s already coercion. It’s also cheaper to people being on benefits. In a country that let a mass disabling virus let rip - this is a cost saving bill. But we knew this was the agenda since the committee stage when we first heard them vote away safeguards for non terminal disabilities. No one needs AD for autism, Down’s syndrome, anorexia or diabetes. But that’s what they voted on. Any safeguards in place to get this bill through the door is smoke and mirrors to allow state sanctioned death via the back door. It must fail. This bill is completely unsafe for all. Even those they’re hiding this appalling bill behind. They’re using these terminally ill people to get this through. They do not care what happens with them at all.
Grateful to Lauren Edwards for reintroducing the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, having been successful in the Private Members’ Bill ballot.
12
204
539
7,827
She said…what? retweeted
This man who (incredibly) is still trying to cover up the ongoing mass rape of English girls by Muslims wants us to believe that he cares about children’s safety.
430
5,430
26,973
242,365
She said…what? retweeted
This entire campaign was sold with a sense of desperate urgency, yet Esther Rantzen is still with us and Parliament is again being pushed to rush one of the gravest moral and legal changes imaginable. We cannot even guarantee decent care for the living. Why would anyone trust the state with assisted death?
39
284
924
11,331
She said…what? retweeted
This one of the worst House of Commons in living memory. The enthusiasm of some Labour MPs for encouraging vulnerable people to end their lives is frankly shocking.
39
437
2,249
24,697
She said…what? retweeted
It’s very simple now. No more passing the buck. A vote at second reading is a vote for this particular bill and the Parliament Act Plan. Every MP voting for it is signing up to forcing this particular bill into law no matter what.
There are two issues: the principle and this particular bill. However, you stand on the principle of assisted dying ( VERY different from assisted suicide which this bill is sneaking in with the lack of safeguards) this bill is so unsafe it is actually dangerous.
6
86
226
5,470
She said…what? retweeted
If they try and push through the Assusted Dying Bill we need a GE immediately because pushing through something extremely unsafe & expensive without the public voting for it is wrong. Something this big that changes the relationship between the State & individual needs a public vote. Starmer wont get away with this
48
224
905
10,402
She said…what? retweeted
Looks like a Labour MP is announcing they are bringing back the deeply flawed, unsafe assisted dying bill. Forget social media ban, forget about by-election, forget about a fresh start. One MP and multi million ££ lobbyists saying ignore dangers for the vulnerable
Replying to @AJogee
We have debated this deeply divisive and flawed Bill for over a year and nothing has changed nothing. This Bill will hand sweeping, unchecked powers over life and death and our NHS to future governments..whoever they are. Insane stuff.
18
186
575
24,813
She said…what? retweeted
And the regime and its NPC pundits are trying to persuade voters that @elonmusk is ‘the disinformation’, while they run these operations on the domestic voters as if they’re in Afghanistan
One of those things where you try explaining it to not very political people and you just end up sounding completely mad dailymail.com/news/article-1…
45
587
2,575
102,001
She said…what? retweeted
Two Scottish schoolgirls were assaulted, then smeared as racists. Now their attackers have been convicted. The real story is what the media’s rush to condemn them reveals about elite contempt for the working class in Brita dailysceptic.org/2026/06/14/…
59
1,148
4,216
40,608
This
Facebook - dog groomers, plumbers and Karen's X - people who think theyre it Snap - Lib Dems sending picture of their genitals Insta - AI thirst holes created in Bangalore BlueSky - Sex offender Register past, current and future.
9
She said…what? retweeted
“What exactly is your ‘fair share’ of what someone else has worked for?” - Thomas Sowell
84
1,866
11,415
67,542
She said…what? retweeted
Waiting to board our flight in Washington and there are 3 Scotland fans in kilts walking past. An American lady says" I love your skirts" "They're nae skirts lassie they're kilts , We're Scots not Trannies" I genuinely Lol #tartanarmy #fifaworldcup @jk_rowling
555
5,870
52,816
1,626,066
She said…what? retweeted
The British people are in the absurd position of having to defend their country from their own politicians.
857
6,156
37,735
272,702
The like button will turn into a rocket if I type SpaceX in a post?
13
She said…what? retweeted
Humza Yousaf defending the migrant child molester over the 12 year old girl. How very Pakistani of him. #TwoTier
468
1,260
6,952
450,220
It never crossed my mind that @freddiesayers and @narindertweets would take the same view on ANY subject but here we are. Both spewing their utter contempt for young, white, working class girls. What next, will Freddie commission her to write a think piece for @unherd?
20