Empathy and curiosity are underrated. In-House Tech Privacy AI | Duke U. #lawtwitter Title9Jen@bluesky.social

Joined November 2010
6,003 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
12 Nov 2016
For those asking why #macarthurpark
35
244
566
Jen retweeted
Staggering that the NYT reports Trump/Miller are plotting to suspend habeas corpus (i.e. end the constitution) & by the end of the day it's treated as a non-story, not anywhere near top of major news' outlets websites.
302
3,544
12,389
409,158
1) Apple device face scans STAY ON DEVICE. These do not. I also refuse to use my own biometrics for my devices. 2) The backup method is government IDs. This will be necessary in many millions of instances bc facial age estimation is notoriously often wrong. In some cases it needs to figure out get years or days of life - an impossible task. 3) These systems have breached over and over again. And this creates thousands or millions of victims of identity theft. Au10tix, Tea App, Discord's vendor, and more recently one used for weed clubs in Spain Playing this down as trivial is a wild take.
You’re going to see a lot in your X timeline about how the social media ban is unworkable and illiberal - and it will be one the most obvious examples of how social media skews debate. But it will be one of the most popular things the government is doing theguardian.com/uk-news/2026…
12
204
1,013
61,656
"All options have to be on the table" -- Warnock on expanding the Supreme Court
1
17
I wrote about what was actually in that #Fable guardrail bypass research paper, and why it should never have triggered an #AI model export control. We can't export control our way to cyber resilience. So many tshirt ideas. lutasecurity.com/post/the-fa…
11
85
335
104,564
Jen retweeted
I fear we have a cruel month ahead of us: the future of campaign finance law, the definition of Election Day, the fate of birthright citizenship. While I remain hopeful, I am prepared for democracy to leave this month weaker than it entered. democracydocket.com/opinion/…
601
2,744
6,168
297,448
Jen retweeted
When people in Washington lower their voices and say, ā€œPlease don’t use my name. I’m afraid he’ll come after my family’s livelihood,ā€ it means something has broken. People no longer trust the law to protect them.
418
4,062
8,634
357,481
I’ve seen the paper. It’s not a jailbreak. It was Defense Oriented Prompting (DOP), capabilities defenders need. My thoughts on the hasty Export Controls that made Anthropic pull Fable. If Nat defense is the goal, this just scored an own goal against us wsj.com/tech/ai/anthropic-ha…
18
70
347
45,337
1. You can’t ā€œpatchā€ this behavior without rendering the model less effective for defenders 2. No new frontier models can be developed or released if this is the administration’s best take 3. We don’t have time to strip defenders of the latest models & halt AI improvement
I’ve had a number of conversations with folks inside and outside government about the current situation with Anthropic, and here is what I believe to be true: — As we know, Anthropic publicly released its Mythos class models earlier this week under the commercial name Fable. — Fable is Mythos with guardrails. But if those guardrails fail, then you’ve exposed Mythos and its advanced cyber capabilities to people who shouldn’t have them. (Keep in mind that Anthropic itself widely promoted the idea that Mythos was a cyberweapon and needed to be regulated as such. They asked for government regulation of Mythos and championed the guardrails on Fable. If there is a vulnerability — big or small — it is Anthropic’s responsibility to patch.) — A highly credible trusted partner of both Anthropic and the USG who was testing Fable came forward with a jailbreak of those guardrails. The Admin asked Dario to fix the jailbreak or de-deploy the model. Dario refused. — In their blog post, Anthropic defended its decision by saying the jailbreak isn’t serious. That is not what the trusted partner and the USG believe; nor is that kind of minimizing language consistent with Anthropic’s brand as the AI safety company. It’s difficult to fathom how they could claim a jailbreak allowing operability of a cyber weapon could be defined as not ā€œserious.ā€ — In the past, Anthropic has always said that safety must be top priority and taken super seriously. In this case, Anthropic prioritized the continued offering of the consumer model over safety. — In reaction, the Admin issued the export control. The Admin did this reluctantly. It’s been very surprised that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to cooperate with a reasonable safety request (ie fixing the jailbreak issue). Anthropic’s reaction is very much at odds with their branding and ethos as a safe AI research community. — The Admin’s hope now is that Anthropic remediates the safety issue, the export control is lifted, and Fable goes back into general release. The Admin wants all of this to happen as soon as possible. It is frankly bewildered that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to comply with safety requests that it previously said were its highest priority. — Those trying to misdirect and tie this action to the prior DoW/Anthropic issues are wrong. The Admin values Anthropic’s technical capabilities and feels that this issue, while serious, should be easily resolved. The ball is in Anthropic’s court.
12
31
198
24,023
Jen retweeted
Extent to which White House allies are signaling that this is a culture war issue, not a technical one, is striking
I'm told Anthropic is perplexed by the situation they are facing, so they've turned to @k8em0 to do their on-the-record rapid response. These people really just don't get it....
23
108
835
329,881
Jen retweeted
Here’s the connection to be made: The administration bit off more than it could chew when it indicted SPLC, a group with national support. So now it will try to intimidate folks on the ground, small local groups who are supporting our right to vote. We must not let that happen.
🚨EXCLUSIVE >> @FBI agents raided Cleveland office of Ohio voter registration group, in what many consider part of broader Trump administration effort to intimidate and sow doubt about voting integrity in key swing states. Agents fanned out across Ohio, following and questioning canvassers and volunteers. "Straight up intimidation" said group's board member. ms.now/news/ohio-pro-democra…
97
1,765
3,804
96,121
Jun 12
Jun 11
Buttigieg: Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that there have to be nine Supreme Court justices. That one doesn't even take a constitutional amendment. It just takes a readiness to set up a court that fits this country.Ā  We could have 13 seats matching the district structure of the federal judiciary, but also a process that makes it less partisan. We cannot have partisan warfare every time there's an opening on the court
1
1
19
Jen retweeted
Today, @Glean's Work AI Institute published the inaugural Work AI Index, based on 6,000 digital workers across the U.S., U.K., and Australia. One of the clearest findings is that AI is creating a new layer of work inside the enterprise. We call it botsitting. AI was supposed to remove tedious work. In too many organizations, it has created more of it: feeding systems the right context, checking outputs, catching mistakes, and cleaning up work that looked finished but was not. Digital workers report spending 6.4 hours a week on that hidden labor. That helps explain one of the biggest gaps in enterprise AI right now. 87% of digital workers use AI at work. 75% say it makes them more productive. But only 13% say their organization is performing significantly better as a result. That’s the gap between AI usage and AI impact. Too much of the value is being absorbed by supervision, rework, and cleanup. The companies that get this right will not just deploy more AI or better models. They will redesign work to reduce botsitting—so AI gets the context it needs, people stay accountable for judgment, and the gains show up at the organizational level, not just in one employee’s prompt window. Read the Work AI Index here: glean-it.com/4vJ0InG
2
5
27
2,347
Lmao Trump also brutally booed at the Bryant Park Knicks watch party šŸ¤£šŸæ

65
1,128
7,510
175,949
I don't live in LA, but for those who do, I'd encourage a vote for Nithya Raman. She's far better on housing, which is LA's #1 issue, and more braodly Bass does not deserve to be re-elected. We should remind politicians even in deeply partisan areas they can be held to account.
108
233
2,956
109,412
Jen retweeted
🚨BREAKING: The American Postal Workers Union (APWU) says it is ā€œdeeply alarmedā€ about the United States Postal Service’s (USPS) new rule created to carry out President Donald Trump’s plans for restricting mail-in voting. democracydocket.com/news-ale…
642
7,142
12,612
252,133
Jen retweeted
LOS ANGELES UPDATE: An excellent update for Nithya Raman. She wins today's batch over Spencer Pratt by almost 21%, which is over what she needs. Pratt's lead over Raman (for the 2nd runoff spot, behind Mayor Bass) goes down from 5.9% to 3.4%.
66
255
3,434
190,293
Jen retweeted
The reason: Meta AI Chat bot did not implement zero trust framework? Nice summary by Anthropic "An agent permitted to read customer records, summarize information, and draft responses has clear boundaries. An agent with vague permission to "help with customer service" does not" cdn.prod.website-files.com/6…
The first cyberattack in history using prompt injection. Attackers used Meta’s chatbot as a tool to take over Instagram accounts belonging to well-known people, brands, and institutions. By manipulating Meta’s AI support system, they convinced it to perform a critical administrative operation: changing or adding an email address associated with the victim’s account. Basic mistake: using LLM as a security boundary. The attacker contacted Meta’s bot, provided the username of the account they wanted to take over, and asked it to link that account to a new email address controlled by the attacker. In practice, this meant that the person controlling the new email address could receive or provide the confirmation code, and then use the modified recovery channel to reset the password and take over the account. AI support became a path for bypassing account security. If a chatbot can change an email address or initiate account recovery without independent verification of the owner, the attacker does not need to know the password or break through traditional security controls. It is sufficient to convince the automated support operator to perform an operation that the attacker should not normally be allowed to request. theverge.com/tech/941179/met…
4
25
77
8,853
Jen retweeted
I'm already seeing a lot of analyses of the Los Angeles early numbers are though those are close to final. Again, analyze away, but do take recent history into account for hints of how the count will still evolve!
Replying to @Taniel
Context: In the first batches of votes counted in the 2022 California primary, Rick Caruso led Karen Bass 42/37. The final result of the primary had Bass ahead 43% to 36%. In the November election, the first batch had Caruso up 51/49. Bass won 55/45.
2
15
109
21,220
Jen retweeted
🚨 BREAKING: President Trump has just signed an Executive Order on AI that implements a VOLUNTARY framework for AI developers to engage with the government before releasing "covered frontier models." *Important: Contrary to what many media outlets have written in the past few hours, the White House is not seeking a mandatory registration system or some sort of vetting scheme before models can be launched. This is NOT the type of oversight being imposed, and this is explicitly clarified in the Executive Order itself (see the section I highlighted in blue below). The focus of the EO is to help protect the United States' critical infrastructure, cyber defense capabilities, and national security (mainly against external attacks). The trigger for this EO was likely Mythos, the model developed by Anthropic, which it voluntarily shared with the U.S. government for its cyberdefense-related capabilities but decided not to release to the public. The White House used that as a blueprint for future "covered frontier models." Again, it's not a registration system: it's voluntary. - >To stay up to date, subscribe to my AI governance newsletter (link below).
8
20
59
17,514