AGI should be owned by everyone

It was nice to see fellow community members that represented the Intersect ICC seat get a shout out in "An Introduction to Cardano Governance" on Cardano Academy. Thanks @Cardano_CF! @Bitcows @M3RSEE @MauroAndreoliA @UbioObu @HephyPool @hoskytoken @jsierrax @ElCryptonaut @AdamRusch @adanorthpool

I was waiting for you to give a reply.

This is what differentiates Christianity,no Christian reads the Bible to claim everything in the Bible is by God, the Bible is a combination of about 66 books and over 27 authors,we don’t read the Bible thinking it was written by God, rather that d writers were inspired by God

If God sent both prophets, we have a built-in way to evaluate them: The Torah. It is the established covenant document. Every subsequent claimant to prophetic succession is, like it or not, auditioning against it. So let’s see how they performed. Jesus’s audition is aggressive. Six times in Matthew 5 he says, “you have heard it said to those of ancient times,” and then overrides it with his own authority. Not “God told me,” or “the revelation says,” but a staggering “I say to you.” It goes deeper. When asked about divorce, Jesus doesn't quibble over Mosaic permissions. He goes entirely behind Moses, back to creation itself. He didn't just know what Moses said; he knew why he said it, locating the original intent. That’s insider knowledge. Then he initiates comparisons rather than just surviving them. “Before Abraham was, I am.” In Matthew 22, he turns a question about the Davidic Messiah into a devastating counter-examination: “If David calls the Messiah Lord (in Psalm 110), how is he his son?” Nobody could answer. They looked like fools. Moses knew the covenant with Abraham. Jesus knew the Law from the inside out. There is an organic, traceable coherence. Now apply that same logic forward. Muhammad also claims prophetic succession, explicitly stating he came to confirm what came before. So we use the same standard. Muhammad versus the Torah. He knows the narrative furniture; Sinai, the commandments, the golden calf. But he completely misses the interior logic. He knows what happened, but he doesn't seem to inhabit what it meant. But Muhammad versus Jesus is where the argument entirely collapses. What does the Quran actually know about what Jesus TAUGHT? I’m not talking about his birth, his miracles, or late-stage theological arguments about his nature. What does it know about his message? There are no Beatitudes in the Quran. No Lord’s Prayer. No “love your enemies.” No Golden Rule. Not a single parable. Not one antithesis from the Sermon on the Mount. The Quran’s Jesus has almost no teaching content at all. His most notable speeches are a denial of his own divinity and a prediction of the prophet coming after him 😂. You know what is happening there. The parables were given to massive crowds. The Lord’s Prayer was meant to be repeated. This material was widely circulating. Yet, none of it appears. A genuine successor would have done to Jesus what Jesus did to Moses. He would have engaged the text. “You have heard that Jesus said love your enemies, but I say to you...” Muhammad never does. He never demonstrates that he knows what Jesus taught well enough to confirm it, let alone extend it. This silence is a structural disqualification. The standard fallback is that prophets don’t need to demonstrate continuity. But that violates Muhammad’s own terms. The Quran presents itself as a confirmation of previous scripture. In Surah 5:47, it commands 7th-century Christians, present tense, to judge by the Gospel God revealed to them. If the text was already hopelessly corrupted, that instruction makes zero sense. The claim that the Gospels were textually altered before Islam, is absent from the Quran. It was invented later by Muslim scholars who noticed the exact problem we are looking at right now. They had to conclude the Gospels were altered, because the alternative was admitting their prophet was wrong. But history doesn't back them up. Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus predate Islam by centuries, the text hasn't moved. The prophetic chain has one absolute structural requirement: each link must actually know the one before it. Moses knew Abraham. Jesus knew the Law deeply enough to raise the bar antithesis by antithesis. Muhammad gives us a Jesus stripped of the Sermon on the Mount, stripped of his parables, and stripped of his ethics. Only one of them showed up knowing the material, his name is Jesus.

There are four distinct architectures of divine promise in scripture, living inside four figures: Abraham, Joseph, David, and the Son of Man. Through every circumstance, the word of God is fulfilled, but what each man must wrestle with on the ground is completely different. Abraham’s promise is unconditional. Nobody needs to envy him for the covenant to hold, and no adversary is required to build his road. But Abraham faces a unique demon: time. He must fight the clock, which means fighting his own fading human logic. The specific cruelty is that he does not fight alone. Sarah is aging beside him, so internal doubt inevitably externalizes into a domestic conversation, a compromised decision, and a woman named Hagar. An unconditional promise is never an easy promise. It is a slow one, and slow promises break marriages. Joseph’s architecture is different because adversity is not an obstacle to the plan, but is the mechanism itself. God gave him a dream, Joseph announced it at dinner, and that announcement ignited the exact chain of custody that carried him to the palace. Remove the envy, there is no pit. No pit, no Egypt. No Egypt, no throne. His ‘enemies’ are just unwitting freight carriers for his destiny. What makes Joseph’s cross uniquely torturous is the reality that the people who despise him are the very people he belongs to. Nothing shatters identity more than the hatred of those you love. It forces a rapid, brutal maturity. Joseph must become a man before he has ever had the chance to be a boy. David faces a far more rational threat. The man being displaced by your arrival will never love you. King Saul does not need a revelation to feel threatened; you simply have two anointed men in a room with only one throne. Hostility is just the natural temperature of that environment. Notice, though, that Saul’s hatred cannot move David anywhere. Unlike Joseph, David is already in the right country, the right tribe, and the right bloodline. What makes David’s trial distinct is absolute proximity. Joseph is removed from the envy early and shipped across a border. David suffers it at the source. He eats near Saul, playing the harp for the man who will throw a spear at his chest in the morning. He must trust that God can solve a problem while standing directly next to it. Then there is the Son of Man. In the book of Daniel, long before any cross, garden, or earthly trial, the Son of Man approaches the Ancient of Days and is handed dominion, glory, and a kingdom that will never pass away. For him, the crown is not a future event. It is a present reality. He walks into every room already possessing what the other three are dying to see. This completely changes the nature of his fight. Abraham fights time. Joseph fights the heartbreak of beloved hatred. David fights proximity to a violent king. The Son of Man must fight certainty itself. He knows exactly what he carries. Because he knows, he must constantly resist the ultimate temptation: the presumption that the process is beneath him, that the suffering is optional, and that the path is inefficient. He must actively restrain himself from summoning the legions of angels available to him at any given microsecond. In Gethsemane, in Pilate’s hall, and on the hill, he has the authority to end it all. Not escape it, but end it. He is not a man in a pit hoping someone pulls him out. He is the crowned king choosing to stay in the pit. This is the hardest posture in scripture. Abraham, Joseph, and David are patient because they have no alternative. The Son of Man is patient while holding the absolute key to his own release. All four carry the promise, and all four must endure. But only one of them restrains his own hand. And that specific restraint is what saves the rest of us.

There are terrorists in the bush, those ones will burn humans alive, rape children and adult alike, maim, behead, kidnap, collect ransom and wreck havoc. Let's call them bush terrorists, they carry guns, look unhealthy and mean, they receive all the negative backlash and identity associated with terrorism. But There are terrorist in the city too, they don't look mean or unhealthy, some are even of the diaspora. They don't receive any negative backlash for what they do. Some of them have very good jobs and can conveniently pass for normal human beings. We shall call them city terrorists Their job is clear and spelt out, for the bush terrorists will target your body, they hope news of their previous carnages has helped paralyze your body with fear. But the city terrorist job isn't physical it is mental, it is their job to wage massive all out psychological warfare on you. And they have multiple rhetorics prepared for you, e.g - there is nothing the government can do about it - not all Fulanis are terrorists (as if it needed to be said) - they are not terrorists they are just bandits. - they are not terrorists they are disgruntled freedom fighters - (add yours in the comments) From time memorial this is how wars were waged, kill the people before you kill the people - basically get some people to prepare the people to prepare themselves for slaughter. Because for real, what you see here is guerrilla tactics, they dare not call it war or battle, They are outnumbered, an organized southwest army front will wipe them out in months. The Osogbo War of 1840 is there for reference, this won't be the first time the southwest are stopping terror or land grabbing incursion. We beat them back at Osogbo tails between legs. Now they have to strike using elements of surprise as well as elements of familiarity. You see cattle around and herders, you are being conditioned. Those cattle will fair better in ranches and their owners will make more profit. So whatever the beef is it isn't about cattle or profit. It is an horrible agenda that must be stopped dead in tracks. It is their first psychological strategy deployment - we are in your face and there is nothing you can do about it. It is why they take their cattle to go and graze on NASS lands. The end game there is to get you to resign and give up mentally. It is the job of the city terrorists to reinforce this, make you pliable for murder and compliant to receive terror. It is your job to identify them and treat them as hostile, this is how you keep your life. If he has never condemned Fulani killings but is quick to speak for Fulanis, he is a city terrorist. If he is an elite, and uses plenty of words to say nothing he is a city terrorist. May Lord of Hosts be with you.

Was a great day where we had @astroboysoup run us through the C4 marketing proposal, @ShugaAyomi talk About @CardanoBounties and how they are going to work with us at Discover Cardano to help with Talent Acquisition journey from Our Morrocco pavilion work last month. We also gave attendees a tour of a potential Cardano conference venue for early next year which was very well received! More to come next week on that!

Retweet this tweet if your club has won the champions league before

I dreamt that Arsenal lost this Carabao cup and won the league and Champions league.

The claim that the God of the Bible is evil is not just wrong, it is self-defeating, philosophically incoherent, and collapses the moment you actually read the book you are critiquing. First, if you are going to prosecute the God of the Bible, you must engage the God the Bible actually presents, not the straw deity of internet atheism. The Bible’s God is Trinitarian, self-sufficient, existing in loving relationship within himself before creation, lacking nothing, and needing no one. James says every good thing, sleep, pleasure, beauty, laughter, comes from him. That framing is is crucial. If “God is evil” what is the comparative moral standard. What do you compare him to? If the universe is purposeless matter, then morality is just your nervous system firing preferences. You are just filing a complaint with no court, no law, and no standing. If however your moral standard is real and binding across all people, then congratulations. You have just accidentally argued for the existence of a moral lawgiver. The accusation is either incoherent or it proves God exists. But to go deeper, the terror of a needy, lonely, wounded God making capricious decisions is a terror we can rationalize since is just human pathology at cosmic scale. That is explainable. What should make us pause is the terror of the God who lacks nothing, who gains nothing from punishing anyone and who was complete and satisfied before you drew your first breath. When THAT God judges, it cannot be ego. He has nothing to win. Which means when the biblical God acts in severity, it is because justice is real and he is its embodiment. The atheist is prosecuting a deity that does not exist in the text they are quoting. And who even has the right to determine what a people deserve? Who has the sight to weigh the full arc of a civilization’s corruption, the downstream of unchecked evil, the futures that never happen because judgment didn’t come? The critic sits in a courtroom with a fraction of the evidence, and demands the verdict is overturned and that is baseless epistemic arrogance. But most crucially, every other religion’s God stays hidden; conveniently invisible, and safe from examination. The God of the Bible, uniquely, when accused, enters the dock. He becomes human. He submits to the conditions of his own creation, walks in it for thirty three years, and is examined at close range by people who wanted to destroy him. Roman judges, religious prosecutors, crowds, betrayers etc. All hostile witnesses with murderous intent scrutinising his every word and deed. And the verdict returned by even his enemies: “I find no fault in this man”. The most morally examined life in human history belongs to the accused. You want to meet the God of the Bible? You already can. His name is Jesus. Judge him there, on the ground, in the flesh, and then come back with your accusation. The concept of evil applied to this God is a man essentially standing in a house built by someone else, breathing air he did not make, using a moral vocabulary he cannot justify, and pointing at the architect and calling him wicked. The irony is hilarious and the case collapses, because the God being accused already answered it in person.

I’m not surprised people post nonsense like this. I’m surprised anyone is moved by it. The robe, the beard, the prayer posture, the diet. You think Christianity is a costume contest? You think Jesus came to establish the most culturally authentic Middle Eastern lifestyle brand? Christianity is a diagnosis. Not of your habits, but of you. Your nature, your essence, the thing you were born with. You came into this world tilted away from God, not because someone taught you to be, but because you are born of man, born of flesh, born of a will that curves instinctively toward itself. That is not a cultural or ritual problem. That is a YOU problem. And no prophet who bowed correctly ever fixed a nature. Jesus doesn’t say dress like me. He says you must be born again. Born of the Spirit! Not reformed or repositioned. Regenerated, because what you have cannot be fixed, only replaced. I don’t care about the robe or the beard. I need saving from myself. From this body that knows what is right and chooses otherwise anyway. From this flesh that is, left alone, its own god. That is the question Islam never answers. Why do I do what I hate? Who rescues me from this? Paul whom you Muslims hate asked it and offered Jesus as the answer, the only answer.

Good afternoon @SevillaFC_ENG @SevillaFC See you in court..🫵🏾

Motion madness🐊🐊🐊😂🔥

Went all out on this, Even bought costumes 🔥🔥 I hope @Odumodublvck_ sees this o 🥹 Make una tag Odumodu for me abeg @boy_director @5starbarber_1 #MOTIONSICKNESS

ODUMODUBLVCK abeg where my 2 million😂🔥 #MOTIONSICKNESS

On today’s episode of #documemtingmysmallwins As Part of trying everything new! I applied for The Africa FinTech Launchpad and I got in. Looking forward to seeing how this spans out for me. Check link for details 👇

There are experiences one shares, and I automatically know this one has encountered God, when you encounter God it oozes put, and most time in the little things

We’re Ready! The official video for DAI DAI, the FIFA World Cup Official 2026 song is here! ⚽️🐺 @burnaboy youtu.be/fcnDmrtj6Sk?si=Pfgf… A big thank you to Leo Messi, Mbappé, Luis Díaz, Vinícius Jr, Rodri, Takefusa Kubo, Santiago Giménez, Alphonso Davies, Jamal Musiala, Christian Pulisic, Harry Kane and Erling Haaland

If my written content has blessed you at any point, please support my YouTube channel. We just hit 400 subscribers, and I’d love to reach 500 before dropping the next episode. Thank you to everyone supporting the work, God bless you all ❤️ youtu.be/nbKr71Cj50A