mythos will be bad ON PURPOSE on ai "frontier llm research" tasks, this is very very sad for the research community also the fact that this is un purpose not visible to the user is crazy

Even if war seems ended, crisis is at the gate, Web3 and alts effected deeply hard and we will speak with industry leaders their strategies against possible big crisis. This Spaces will be most educational for everybody! x.com/i/spaces/1OxwblBmdwPJB

Banned from @claudeai today after a full year as a power user — consistently maxing limits and paying 20x the monthly Pro/Max fees. Not using OpenClaw, third-party tools, agents, or anything against TOS. Just legitimate heavy usage. Randomly nuking your highest-paying, most dedicated customers is customer-hostile and terrible for business. How do you retain a customer base this way? Or is the goal to remove all the users spending the most compute? Transparency needed. 👀 @AnthropicAI @DarioAmodei @trq212

LiteLLM HAS BEEN COMPROMISED, DO NOT UPDATE. We just discovered that LiteLLM pypi release 1.82.8. It has been compromised, it contains litellm_init.pth with base64 encoded instructions to send all the credentials it can find to remote server self-replicate. link below

OpenClaw is now FREE China’s Tencent just put ClawBot inside WeChat as a plugin.. install takes 2 mins here’s how to set it up in 3 steps:

For the record. Banks’ War on Stablecoin Yields Is a Self‑Defeating Cartel Play The banks’ standoff over the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY Act) has moved from caution to farce. They are fighting the one bill that would actually constrain the yield‑bearing stablecoin products they claim will drain their deposits. Banks have spent months trying to gut provisions that let ordinary Americans earn modest returns, 2-4%, on digital dollars through transactional incentives and liquidity rewards. Their fear is clear: if people can hold a dollar‑denominated token in a wallet and earn a real return, hundreds of billions could leak out of low‑yield deposits, squeezing margins and weakening their privileged funding model. That concern might be defensible, if their strategy weren’t completely backwards. By blowing up the White House’s narrow compromise and stalling CLARITY past the March 1 deadline, the banks are preserving the very loophole they say terrifies them. Under the existing GENIUS Act, issuers can’t pay interest, but exchanges and wallets can still offer “rewards” on those same stablecoins. That grey zone is exactly what CLARITY is designed to bring inside the perimeter. The administration’s offer was hardly radical: ban passive “park‑and‑earn” yield that directly mimics deposits, but allow activity‑based rewards tied to payments, transfers, and liquidity. That protects core funding while letting digital‑asset markets remain competitive. The banking lobby’s response was to demand a near‑total prohibition, effectively conscripting regulators to preserve banks’ ability to pay near‑zero on deposits while shutting down anyone who offers a market‑like return. At that point this is no longer prudential oversight; it is naked protectionism. It keeps consumers trapped in a rigged game where incumbents hoard cheap capital and innovation is forced into legal grey zones or offshore. President Trump is right to say the banks are holding the “Crypto Agenda” hostage. Passing CLARITY with the compromise intact, ban idle yield, permit genuine usage‑based rewards—is the only coherent way to protect deposits without strangling a market that already exists. If banks kill that outcome, they may get exactly what they fear: stablecoin rewards growing anyway, just further from U.S. law and closer to the edge of the system, while Americans finally see how little value their so‑called guardians of stability are actually willing to deliver. As President Trump put it, “We’re not going to let the banks strangle innovation just to protect a broken model, Americans deserve real choice, real yield, and a fair system that works for them, not just for Wall Street.”

🌍 Reality is expensive. Simulation is the shortcut. But what if the simulation could think, respond, and remember? Today, we open-source LingBot-World, an interactive world model built on @Alibaba_Wan Wan2.2! 🔥 We’re pushing the limits of: 🔷 High-Fidelity Simulation & Precise Control 🔷 Long-Horizon Consistency & Memory 🔷 Modeling Physical & Game Worlds It that can generate nearly 10 minutes of controllable, physics-grounded simulation in real-time. A digital training ground for embodied AI. 👇 #WorldModel #EmbodiedAI #OpenSource #Simulation #Robotics

So excited about builder nights tonight during @SolanaConf Come say hi!

sorry our team is at breakpoint this week sorry our team is at devconnect this week sorry our team is at token2049 this week sorry our team is at ethdenver this week sorry our team is at PBW this week sorry our team is at DAS this week sorry our team is at ethcc this week

One of the most important papers of 2025, and probably of the past three years. DeepSeek R1 has removed the moat from OpenAI and given a reasoning LLM secret to humanity. R1 made the reasoning LLM the de facto standard of the modern language model. DeepSeek has shown how one can take a pretrained language model that doesn't have any practical problem-solving skills, and make it learn, on its own via reinforcement learning, to solve the hardest scientific and coding problems. Thanks to DeepSeek, we now have Claude 4.5, Gemini 3, and Kimi K2. This paper, published in Nature, explains how R1 was built. Let the article talk to you on ChapterPal: chapterpal.com/s/2092823e/de… Download the PDF: nature.com/articles/s41586-0…

There are no words to describe what I am feeling right now, what a huge honor. Thank you everyone at @arcprize, especially @fchollet, @GregKamradt, @mikeknoop for choosing TRM for the 2025 #ARC Paper Award! Special thanks to @k_schuerholt for replicating TRM! 🙏

🚨Live Stream - Solana Demo Day - SEZ Dubai x.com/i/broadcasts/1lDxLBXWe…