computer scientist, professor, researcher in computer vision (teaching machines to see), philosopher and ex-basketball player, scuba diver, human being!
🗓️ Poster Session 2 is this afternoon, come find us at board #133 (Paper ID 40689)!
🧘♂️ We'll be presenting ET3: an energy-based framework for adversarial robustness in vision-language models.
📌 With @Hussain68018934, Antonio D'Orazio, Odelia Melamed (Weizmann Institute)
#CVPR26
On Friday, June 5 (afternoon session), I along with @_iAc , Odelia Melamed and Antonio D'Orazio be presenting our paper at CVPR:
A Provable Energy-Guided Test-Time Defense Boosting Adversarial Robustness of Large Vision-Language Models.
This may be a controversial take, but I think it needs to be said: the gap between computer vision research in academia and industry is widening with every conference.
A huge fraction of @CVPR papers—especially those that boil down to "we tweaked/fine-tuned/RL'ed large-scale model X to improve on task Y"—will become obsolete with the next model release. That's not where academia creates lasting value. PIs should adapt much faster to this changing reality.
Academia should focus on fundamentally new ideas, new problem formulations, explaining emergent phenomenology, or uncovering blind spots that industry can later solve with scale, compute, and data.
We are grateful to all of the 17,491 reviewers who helped make #CVPR2026 possible. We are especially pleased to recognize the following Outstanding Reviewers, whose high-quality reviews (as judged by their Area Chairs) placed them among the top 5% of reviewers.
How did #ECCV reviews treat you? 😬 If you're not that happy — and you work on #unlearning, #modelediting, #modelmerging, or #interpretability — consider submitting to the 3rd Workshop and Challenge on Unlearning and Model Editing at @eccvconf
We accept both full papers and extended abstracts, so there's a format for every contribution.
📅 Submission deadline: 9 July 2026 (AoE)
🔗openreview.net/group?id=thec…
EUROCRYPT 2026 is underway in Rome!
Yesterday we officially opened the conference at the Auditorium Parco della Musica Ennio Morricone, the beautiful Renzo Piano-designed venue hosting the cryptography community this week.
#EUROCRYPT2026#Cryptography
What will the role of researchers be in 5 years?
What happens to narrow scientific foundation models?
Can we really scale our way to genius creativity?
We will attempt to answer these questions (and more) on Sunday in the post-agi workshop at @iclr_conf
We are at #ICLR2026 🇧🇷 presenting 5 papers spread across the main conference, 23-24-25 April. Stop by if you are interested in trustworthy and safe AI, generative models, robustness, and model inversion
with @Hussain68018934@BrigliaRosaria@adrianrminut Dario, and Hazem
Excited to share that "Energy-Based Transformers are Scalable Learners and Thinkers" was accepted to #ICLR2026 as an oral! 🎉
I'll be giving the oral this Friday in Brazil, so come watch if you're around :)
LLMs are injective and invertible.
In our new paper, we show that different prompts always map to different embeddings, and this property can be used to recover input tokens from individual embeddings in latent space.
(1/6)
Sad to miss #ICLR2026 this year, but our work will be there with Simone and Stefano.
We propose the first training-free framework for permanently removing concepts from generative video models.
📅 Fri, Apr 24 • 11:15 AM – 1:45 PM
📍 Pavilion 4 P4-#4305
Bye bye DiCaprio!
It just takes a single gradient step on the input using an #EBM loss to boost the #robustness of robust LVLMs like CLIP/LLaVa. We also prove that the accuracy improves if the gradient norm of the gt class is the highest. thanks Odelia!
Part 1/3
Excited to share that our paper “A Provable Energy-Guided Test-Time Defense: Boosting Adversarial Robustness of Large Vision-Language Models” has been accepted at CVPR 2026 (Main Conference) 🎉
Some "fixed" samples are very tricky, like VLM switches from Red Sox (incorrect) to Reds (correct), while, for example, @Hussain68018934 did not know the difference between the two, and we initially thought it was a mistake.
Andrej Karpathy on autoresearch with an untrusted pool of workers:
"My designs that incorporate an untrusted pool of workers (into autoresearch) actually look a little bit like a blockchain.
Instead of blocks, you have commits, and these commits can build on each other and contain changes to the code as you're improving it.
The proof of work is basically doing tons of experimentation to find the commits that work."
The idea that distributed & permissionless autoresearch ~= proof-of-useful-work remains a high-level intuition for now, but it is extremely intriguing to say the least.
Someone needs to take this further. See QT for more on what's missing.