If you didn’t continue in one of the sciences through your formal education and (probably very reasonably) therefore don’t understand the full rigours of the scientific method, then please read this from Simon.👇
Shouldn’t need saying but it’s only “obvious” if you know.
“If a study is funded by a industry, it can’t be trusted.”
It sounds skeptical.
It sounds smart.
But it’s wrong.
And if you actually care about evidence, here’s what you need to know.
Let’s start with the claim:
💬 “They’re just buying the results.”
💬 “Industry-funded science is fake.”
💬 “You can’t trust corporate research.”
Sounds reasonable. Until you look at how science actually works.
FACT: Many breakthrough studies are funded by companies.
Think:
💊 Clinical trials for life-saving drugs.
🌾 Crop science to improve yields.
🔋 Battery tech for green energy.
No private funding = no progress.
But doesn’t that create bias?
It can - if no one checks.
That’s why we built layers of independent oversight:
✅ Peer review.
✅ Regulator audits.
✅ Transparency rules.
✅ Replication studies.
✅ Disclosure of conflicts.
Science is built to detect BS.
In fact, most high-impact industry studies must pass through:
🔍 Independent regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, EFSA, EPA…)
📊 External review panels
📁 Public data disclosures
This isn’t “trust us.” It’s “prove it - again, and again.”
Here’s what people forget:
Funding source ≠ result quality.
Study design, methods, transparency, and independent review do.
A bad study funded by an NGO is still a bad study.
A rigorous study funded by a company can still be true.
Want an example?
Every single vaccine you took was tested in company-funded trials.
Those trials were also reviewed, re-reviewed, and approved by independent scientists across multiple agencies.
That’s why we trust the data - not the logo.
Let’s fix the narrative:
❌ “Industry = lies”
✅ “Transparency oversight = credibility”
Dismissing evidence just because of who paid for it is lazy skepticism.
Real critical thinking asks: “Was it done right?” Not “Who signed the check?”
So next time someone says:
“If it’s funded by industry, I don’t trust it.”
Ask them:
Do you read the methods?
Do you apply that logic to every study?
Or are you just outsourcing your skepticism?
Science doesn’t care who pays.
It cares what holds up. 🧪👀