building a hedge fund native to prediction markets

Joined February 2017
227 Photos and videos
This is going to be one of the most fascinating reads of 2026: Saplings: The Childhoods of Exceptional Entrepreneurs by @mariogabriele "For instance, the traditional mythology is that great entrepreneurs follow a rags-to-riches arc. I did not expect anything so facile, but anticipated more of a barbell, a split between patrician heirs taking a family business to new heights and those who had gritted their way up from nothing. What I found instead was something more interesting. What seemed to unite founders more than familial wealth, or the absence of it, was the motion of that wealth. With intriguing regularity, entrepreneurs were raised by families in flux – either losing their position, or rising to greater prominence. They endured what it meant to lose everything or saw how luck, grit, and intelligence could produce a better life. Being moved by an economic vector is a more common pattern than belonging to a specific class. More than that, though, there has been a deepening. A sense of what it means to have been a truly obsessive child, what drive looks like and boredom, too, how pain is transmuted into motion, and where silvery moments of opportunity – those little glimpses of the future – appear in the mundane and how a person perceives them and spins them into the beginning of something bigger." generalist.com/p/saplings-in…
2
8
841
What about those who grew great through the craft of investing? Is Warren Buffett a founder? In point of fact, yes, but his art is of a different kind. Does that matter? I have made exceptions to all of my rules. Because of that, and other varied caveats, any attempts to make statistical judgments (e.g., “25% of founders started working before the age of 12”) would represent false precision. The goal is, explicitly, to look for patterns, not decide whether a certain trait has true statistical significance.
5
447
public equity markets autistically obsesses over quarterly income statements and venture investors are exceptionally good at underwriting operational signals. i've learned to do both. trading public equities with a venture mindset is one way to unlock venture returns in liquid markets, AMD just validated the thesis again. Congrats to all holders!!
9 Mar 2025
AMD has the best perf/$ in AI. Everyone still buys NVIDIA. Why? ROCm is a mess. George Hotz is fixing that with TinyGrad. Chiplet Architecture ROCm improvment FPGAs = asymmetric upside. The market is too focused on the income statement and sleeps on operational advances.
2
13
1,016
BlueWalker Capital en La Vanguardia
4
57
2,789
camilo retweeted
Three years ago, I joined @curiouscamilo in building a portfolio from scratch: angel checks, secondaries, listed equities, private credit, SPVs, joint ventures with US funds. We compounded at above 20% IRR. $15m non-custodial AUM. It wasn't enough for Camilo. His thesis: "Equities and SPVs are not defensible. We don't have Buffett's, Hummingbird's, or Sequoia's brand. We need to build a tangible moat that defends and expands our returns." So he looked elsewhere. He saw prediction markets before anyone knew what @Polymarket was — when volumes were flat. He dropped out of school to front-run the trend, partnering up with investors from Hummingbird. Prediction market volumes grew 10x the following year. His intuition is unmatched. Today, @halo__xyz — the venture fund associated with Brevan Howard, one of the most renowned hedge funds in the world — acquired a stake in BlueWalker Capital to accelerate its systematic infrastructure buildout. The buildout of a true moat. Camilo has never stepped onto a trading floor. He's not a quant or a banker. He's the rare kind of entrepreneur with the intellectual capacity and relentless energy to obliterate whatever obstacle stands between him and victory. Keep winning, brother.
BlueWalker Capital has raised one million dollars to scale its systematic trading operations in prediction markets, adding @dhoward’s @halo__xyz and @woutergort of Hummingbird Ventures as shareholders. We are using these funds to strengthen our infrastructure and scale our engineering, research and operations teams. We trade algorithmically using our own balance sheet and shareholder capital, with the capacity to rotate hundreds of thousands of euros in daily volume. Join us on our mission to become the leading hedge fund in this emerging asset class, delivering investment returns while making prediction markets efficient as the world's most accurate source of truth. elperiodico.com/es/economia/…
4
1
41
9,880
camilo retweeted
Extremely proud and excited to be working with Camilo to run trading strategies and market make prediction markets
BlueWalker Capital has raised one million dollars to scale its systematic trading operations in prediction markets, adding @dhoward’s @halo__xyz and @woutergort of Hummingbird Ventures as shareholders. We are using these funds to strengthen our infrastructure and scale our engineering, research and operations teams. We trade algorithmically using our own balance sheet and shareholder capital, with the capacity to rotate hundreds of thousands of euros in daily volume. Join us on our mission to become the leading hedge fund in this emerging asset class, delivering investment returns while making prediction markets efficient as the world's most accurate source of truth. elperiodico.com/es/economia/…
3
1
90
15,750
BlueWalker Capital has raised one million dollars to scale its systematic trading operations in prediction markets, adding @dhoward’s @halo__xyz and @woutergort of Hummingbird Ventures as shareholders. We are using these funds to strengthen our infrastructure and scale our engineering, research and operations teams. We trade algorithmically using our own balance sheet and shareholder capital, with the capacity to rotate hundreds of thousands of euros in daily volume. Join us on our mission to become the leading hedge fund in this emerging asset class, delivering investment returns while making prediction markets efficient as the world's most accurate source of truth. elperiodico.com/es/economia/…
50
12
332
64,038
Prediction markets create a public good: probabilistic truth. Someone has to pay for public goods. Until now, that's been venture dollars and brave market makers subsidizing liquidity to bootstrap these markets. Today marks an inflection point. Polymarket has crossed the threshold where any actor willing to pay for the price discovery of probabilistic truth can now bootstrap a market themselves. No VC required, no professional market maker needed. Whenever probabilistic truth is needed, a market for it will survive on organic demand alone. Volumes, accuracy, and adoption will now increase at a steeper pace. Polymarket has become permanent infrastructure.
Hedge funds, educational institutions, and everyday people are now able to sponsor liquidity rewards to get more reliable Polymarket forecasts. While polymarkets are incredibly accurate even with little volume, this accuracy only improves with additional liquidity incentives.
22
16
173
46,524
now say it with me: raise capex, market vomits, few quarters down the line capex ROI is exceptional, improvements are reflected in the income statement, market reacts to the upside, repeat.
1
16
1,668
25 Dec 2025
People criticize @chamath so much. This is a stellar memo. He’s an extremely sharp and talented investor. Like Hummingbird, FF, and others, he proves right again that venture is an asset class of people: “Special person: Yes” “It’s a team bet”
Taken Sep 1, 2016 when @JonathanRoss321 convinced me we could take on the giants, build new silicon and that AI was coming. In typical SV fashion, we didn’t even have a company yet - just a term sheet from me to invest and the three of us. I spent the next month recruiting as many of the TPU team from Google Wisconsin as I could. “Welcome to chips”, I thought. The company, as with all important companies, went through its own trials and tribulations including promoting Jonathan from CTO to CEO and the inevitable falling out and repair of his and my relationship. Anyways, it all happened for a reason. Today we close this almost decade chapter and Jonathan starts a new one with nVidia. I can’t thank him enough. Sometimes it’s simply better to be lucky than good and be fortunate enough to work with great people and follow them into battle. That is me here. Jonathan was not only the father of TPU when he was at Google but he is a technical genius of biblical proportions. He also assembled a great team with folks like @sundeep and @GavinSherry to back him up. They will also do incredible things at nvidia. Separately, whenever something I’m involved in either crashes or wins, I reread my thoughts when I first did it. Was it luck? Was it skill? What did I learn? What do I do now? YMMV, but I am attaching the original investment memo I wrote a decade ago. I’ll do a more substantive view on why this deal matters and what my guess is about the future of AI silicon from here on an upcoming episode of the pod. In the meantime, Merry Christmas. I am very thankful. So thank you Jonathan, Sunny, Gavin and the entire Groq team. 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽
31
118
2,295
528,492
25 Nov 2025
Why not just quit ? Chuck it all. Sell the business. Take the money and run. Play it conservatively. Relax a little. Real entrepreneurs never do, though, and I haven't either. Generally, real builders are so focused, one-dimensional, and dedicated. They'd have a nervous breakdown after two weeks of sitting around. Their challenge, even their reason for living, would be gone. Why would I swap fun, influence, challenge, and more money than you could ever spend for only a multiple of more money than you can ever spend? I can't think of anything better than my current situation. Should I take the company public and have to answer to more partners, stockholders, and security analysts? Why would we want to do that? We're going in the other direction. We've already bought back Merrill's 30% investment in our company. The first 10% we bought back for $200 million in 1996. And the second 20%, we bought back for $4.5 billion in 2008. Not a bad return on their original investment of $39 million. Sell? No thanks. Answering to no one is the ultimate situation. So back on the treadmill, I go. Ratchet up the risk, enter a new medium, start another project. Improve, develop, expand, go for it. – Michael Bloomberg
3
35
4,699
21 Nov 2025
"the company can be understood fundamentally as an equation/trade. in a best case, the most legible companies grow as a superlinear function of dollars in. the founders are highly verbal, and can clearly articulate and understand the inputs to this growth equation"
on becoming "legible to capital": the most underrated factor in the success of firms is the degree to which they are legible to Capital. defining this precisely is hard ("you know it when you see it"): but an idea, a firm, or a person is legible to Capital (cap-C) when by dint of their existence capital forms behind them in excess. think of an idea being legible to Capital as being magnetically charged to the capital markets. dollars are just attracted to you: allocators discuss it at cocktail parties, funds market it at their AGMs, and twitter discusses novel financing schemes to get more dollars behind the idea. becoming legible to Capital is the single greatest superpower for a fledgling firm. look at ramp, look at cognition, look at leopold, look at toni and dan at dany. these are all superhumans at being legible to Capital. its worth noticing how ideas and people become legible to Capital: first, there is no divide between the ceo/mgmt and the idea. the story is NOT that of an individually successful and impressive individual bringing their talents to a new platform. you can see these kind of puff piece stories in many companies that are illegible to Capital. the company is never about YOU. for a founder to be legible to Capital there can be no air between them and the expression of the idea. their lives only matter insofar as they are building with intensity towards the pure form of the idea. second, the company can be understood fundamentally as an equation/trade. in a best case, the most legible companies grow as a superlinear function of dollars in. the founders are highly verbal, and can clearly articulate and understand the inputs to this growth equation: talent, capital, mgmt, etc. the companies that are most legible to Capital, and the mgmt that runs them, at their best: feel like clockwork toys in the hand. simply by looking at them the levers of progress and output become immediately clear. they are immediate, smack you in the face, expressions of an idea that is both small enough that you can feel the thing click around in your hand, but cosmically large enough the idea feels True in some sense beyond literal. when the trade is immensely clear, every capital provider across the stack can immediately understand their role today-- but more importantly their ability to scale to putting 10-100-100x the number of dollars into the thing as it reaches maturitiy. finally, a company becomes legible to Capital when it is clear the entire firm (from Capital, to mgmt, to talent) is singing from the same song sheet, they are all living their lives in expression of the same exact idea. an idea i've shamelessly stolen from @phineasb is the chocolate cake problem: many firms have great inputs (eggs, chocolate, flour, some beautiful icing) but mgmt thinks they're cooking a soufflé, investors think they're getting cup cakes, and talent thinks they're getting a pound cake. the companies that are most legible to Capital are obsessive about chasing the tolerances between competing ideas of the firm to zero by becoming legible to Capital a firm not only can achieve singularity in the private capital markets (ie unlimited free capital forever) but more importantly, it can unify the secret that ignites it internally with the world outside. when that secret is shared, there is truly no limit.
1
1
13
4,583
19 Nov 2025
Hummingbird just keeps winning
JUST IN: Kraken secures $200M investment from Citadel at $20B valuation
5
2
212
47,931
14 Nov 2025

17 Aug 2025
mNAVs have been steadily declining the past few weeks, across DATs demand for coins has been strong, mNAV compression is being driven by increasing DAT supply (and it’s not slowing down with listings being announced every other week) supply/demand equilibrium of ‘coin exposure through public markets’ will be reflected when mNAVs reach 1x if mNAVs persist ≤ 1x, DATs that have only issued recent aggressive bond/equity raises will eventually start getting liquidated triggering price drops, which will trigger further liquidations discount to nav’s could also appear (0.Yx mNAVs) triggering further liquidations to get back up to 1x mNAV $MSTR mNAV has been compressing at an avg rate of around 0.08x / month TTM. at this rate, in 6 months, MSTR will be at 1x mNAV the newer, less sophisticated, more aggressive DATs are cooked if mNAV reaches and persists ≤ 1x not all DATs are the same, @saylor is one of the very few who knows how to properly run a DATs financial engineering long term history rhymes and @zhusu is ringing the bell.
1
6
4,028
14 Nov 2025
7
1,530
7 Nov 2025
Another Hummingbird win on their first ever biotech deal. They prove again that conviction is found in the founder, not the data room. Congrats to the whole team, it takes 0.1% investors to spot 0.1% outcomes.
7 Nov 2025
It's actually even better. Hummingbird owns 22%. Libertus owns 10%, which is led by Pamir, an ex-HB investor. In total, HB affiliates own ~33%. Hummingbird and their cubs (chicks?) are doing exceptionally well. Congrats to all!
16
4,057
29 Oct 2025
Founders Fund homepage (2013)
1
1
23
2,714
27 Oct 2025
U.S. Regulatory Authority over Payment, Clearing and Settlement Systems (October 27, 2011) Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Financial Markets Group.
1
10
2,297