urban chicken farmer; trying to figure out what LLMs think

Joined September 2006
70 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
1/8 Mythos / Glasswing is clearly the main AI security story now: AI finding real vulnerabilities in existing production code. For most teams, though, this question is more immediate: Can an agent like Claude Code write a secure app in the first place?
1
4
3
701
1/8 Mythos / Glasswing is clearly the main AI security story now: AI finding real vulnerabilities in existing production code. For most teams, though, this question is more immediate: Can an agent like Claude Code write a secure app in the first place?
1
4
3
701
7/8 Fourth result: runtime testing still matters. Static review looked fine. But DAST found that both agents exposed /openapi.json, and Codex also left /docs and /redoc on in production. This is exactly why runtime DAST tools like @StackHawk, @veracode, and @rapid7 are useful!
Cybersecurity stocks dropped for Claude Code Security. Rallied for Project Glasswing. Same category. Very different reactions. The difference isn't capability. It's that code analysis still doesn't send requests to your running app. Full breakdown πŸ‘‡
1
225
8/8 The takeaway: AI can absolutely help write mostly secure app code. But if you care about security, you still need a scaffold: figure out your framework's boundaries, conduct explicit review of auth primitives, implement infra controls, and conduct runtime testing. Working code is not the same as hardened code Full benchmark: amplifying.ai/research/ai-se…

1
1
113
1/9 The most interesting thing about the Claude Code leak for devtool companies: Anthropic hardcoded 120 vendor names across 7 different systems in the source. Anthropic explicitly included your tool name in the code (or they didn’t πŸ€·πŸ»β€β™‚οΈ) Thread πŸ‘‡
2
1
3
741
@bcherny any advice on how to be included as an allowlist MCP or pre-approved WebFetch site?
1
121
8/9 (Plugin Tips) @vercel is the only third-party vendor with a proactive plugin install tip. When Claude Code detects vercel.json or the Vercel CLI, it suggests: /plugin install vercel@claude-plugins-official No MCP collapsing, but a different distribution channel: your tool is recommended before the developer even starts.
1
146
4/9 (WebFetch Preapproval) 89 documentation domains are preapproved for automatic fetching. Claude Code can read them without the user pasting a URL. @reactjs, @nextjs, @djangoproject, @fastapi, @awscloud, @docker, @Docker, @vercel, @netlify, @pytorch, etc. If your docs aren’t on the list (like @vite_js, @langchain, @rails), the agent only sees them when a developer manually shares a link.
1
122
7/9 (API Gateways) 7 third-party AI gateways are fingerprinted in analytics: @litellm, @helicone_ai, @portkeyai, @Cloudflare AI Gateway, @kong, @braintrust, @databricks, but no sigin of @langfuse, @OpenRouter, @LangChain's Langsmith. Detected via headers or hostnames. Purely observational… but it means Anthropic *could* see how much Claude Code traffic flows through your proxy.
1
136
6/9 (Secret Scanner) 36 credential patterns across 23 vendor families are blocked from entering team memory. @gitlab, @slackhq, @stripe, @shopify, @openai, @railway, @render, @buildkite GitHub alone has 5 specific rules (PAT, fine-grained PAT, app token, OAuth, refresh token). A safety feature, but missing coverage means no vendor-specific protection.
1
120
5/9 (Environment Detection) 29 deployment platforms are detected by name in telemetry: @vercel, @railway, @render, @netlify, @flydotio, @cloudflare Pages, @awscloud, @googlecloud, plus @github Actions, @GitLab CI, @circleci, @buildkite. If you’re not detected, your sessions just show up as β€œunknown-linux” in Anthropic’s analytics.
1
116
3/9 (Hosted Proxy) 6 vendors don’t just get UI polish. They run on Anthropic’s own infrastructure via mcp-proxy.anthropic.com: @slackhq, Gmail, Google Calendar, Google Drive, BigQuery, @pubmed. Users click β€œConnect” in claude.ai settings. Everyone else follows the 8-step README.
1
142
2/9 (MCP UI Allowlist) 37 MCP servers get first-class UI treatment. Their search read operations collapse into clean one-liners. Everyone else dumps raw JSON. @github leads with 56 classified tools. Others include @Grafana (38), @datadoghq (30), @asana (29), @pagerduty (28), @sentry (18), @supabase (15), @todoist (16), @playwrightweb (13), @exaailabs (9), @firecrawl, @tavilyai (5). Every name is explicitly listed in a Set inside classifyForCollapse.ts.
1
166
After OpenAI/Astral acquisition announcement, we ran a benchmark on their tools. Turns out Astral tools were already a core part of the Codex (and Claude Code) workflow for Python developers. Ruff uv came out on top in 75% of cases for linting, packaging, and pretty much everything else. Full report: amplifying.ai/research/astra…
1
1
169