Are we going to discuss Metabiota, a U.S. biotech company involved in disease surveillance and biosecurity work (including in Ukraine), with documented links via Hunter Biden’s investment firm, or no?

Recall • Hillary Clinton pushed Biosecurity Strategies & DUAL-USE Research Legislation" Read: 'Approval obtained for BENEFICIAL effects' while approved Research develops Weaponiszation ie. HARM (5th-Gen warfare, Dr Armin Krishnan)🧠 x.com/toobaffled/status/2065… #BioLabs #MindControl

Hunter Biden co-founded Rosemont Seneca Technology Partners (an affiliate of Rosemont Seneca Partners). This firm invested in Metabiota, a San Francisco-based company focused on disease outbreak prediction, data analysis, and biosecurity consulting. Metabiota had contracts with Black & Veatch, a U.S. engineering firm, to support U.S. government-funded biosecurity work in Ukraine (part of the Pentagon’s Biological Threat Reduction Program, or similar DoD/USAID initiatives). These involved upgrading labs to handle dangerous pathogens safely, monitor outbreaks, and reduce bioterrorism risks

The Ontario Court of Appeal has upheld the province’s Security from Trespass and Protecting Food Safety Act. Jason Leblond of Beef Farmers of Ontario says the ruling protects farm biosecurity. Read more: realagriculture.com/2026/06/… #cdnag

Agencies like the U.S. Department of Defense and the NIH historically established and funded these overseas networks to improve global biosecurity, enhance public health oversight, and monitor dangerous naturally occurring diseases.

The same Robbie Martin that knowingly regurgitated neocon propaganda and policed discourse regarding the experimental DARPA jab in lockstep with the rollout of a biosecurity state??

The facilities in Ukraine were standard public health laboratories. They operated under the U.S. Biological Threat Reduction Program (BTRP): a standard security framework that works with over 30 countries globally to secure legacy pathogens and upgrade diagnostic capacity. Their Mandate: This is defensive threat-reduction, not weaponization. The program explicitly reinforces local public health infrastructure to detect and contain outbreaks. Global Footprint: The U.S. partner network spans more than 30 nations across Europe, Asia, and Africa. Ukraine is not an anomaly; it is part of a standard global web designed to prevent the proliferation of weapons. Multilateral: Every country is required by the World Health Organization (WHO) under the International Health Regulations to maintain these exact types of diagnostic capabilities. Conflating pathogen tracking with weapons development ignores how global biosecurity actually functions. Power governed by restraint creates stability. Legitimate public health monitoring is not a threat; it is a baseline requirement for international safety. So you are telling us nothing new, Tulsi. Your presentation is classed as propaganda.

Does it say bioweapons labs? NO. Everyone knows there are bio research labs. The RESEARCH web is designed to prevent the proliferation of weapons. Perhaps you struggle with reading? The facilities in Ukraine were standard public health laboratories. They operated under the U.S. Biological Threat Reduction Program (BTRP): a standard security framework that works with over 30 countries globally to secure legacy pathogens and upgrade diagnostic capacity. Their Mandate: This is defensive threat-reduction, not weaponization. The program explicitly reinforces local public health infrastructure to detect and contain outbreaks. Global Footprint: The U.S. partner network spans more than 30 nations across Europe, Asia, and Africa. Ukraine is not an anomaly; it is part of a standard global web designed to prevent proliferation of weapons. Multilateral: Every country is required by the World Health Organization (WHO) under the International Health Regulations to maintain these specific diagnostic capabilities. Conflating pathogen tracking with weapons development ignores how global biosecurity actually functions. Power governed by restraint creates stability. Legitimate public health monitoring is not a threat; it is a baseline requirement for international safety.

There is significant concern that DTRA’s Biological Threat Reduction Program (BTRP) mission was abused. The priority should address Dual Use Research of Concern (DURC) and biosecurity/pathogen risk during the conflict in Ukraine. Subpoena DTRA officials, Victoria Nuland, Metabiota (DTRA funded) executives, Black & Veatch (key integrating contractor) representatives, and relevant Rosemont Seneca-linked individuals for sworn testimony on: • Exact scopes of work and pathogen handling protocols • Any dual-use or genomic research elements • Oversight mechanisms and compliance with DURC policies • Funding flows and audits • Biosecurity measures (especially conflict-related risks) • Business relationships and potential conflicts The combination of contractor involvement, political connections, historical Soviet-era pathogen stocks, and ODNI’s recent declassifications justifies deeper examination. There is inherent dual-use risk throughout Ukraine’s biolab network. That doesn’t include frozen Risk Group 4 agents becoming a threat in Menchikov were Odessa facility to lose power from strikes. DURC oversight challenges need to be overcome.

The problem now is even if the U.S. stops funding it, China already knows how to do it. As you know CCP-linked biolabs have been found operating on U.S. soil. Unauthorized biolabs lack the containment systems, ventilation, waste disposal, and safety protocols that legitimate ones require. This means that dangerous pathogens are more likely to leak into the surrounding environment and contaminate water systems, HVAC systems, or common areas. The traditional understanding of bioweapons as purely tools of mass destruction is outdated. A simple cold or flu can take out a politician at a key time and send an intimidating message, or be distributed to the masses to rake in money for the corporations that sell a "cure". The biosecurity landscape is so porous that a serial fraudster with extensive CCP ties was able to acquire dangerous pathogens and go undetected for years. lawfaremedia.org/article/two… Researchers point out that existing policies do not capture the full class of potentially hazardous biological materials and generally apply only to federally funded research. This is particularly problematic given that roughly one-quarter of pathogenic research conducted in the United States occurs in the private sector. pandorareport.org/wp-content… Broader U.S. oversight would help, but once again we must STRENGTHEN PROTECTIONS FOR PRIVATE SECTOR WHISTLEBLOWERS, who could report biosafety violations or concerning research practices. Currently, private sector employees who do not work on a government contract nor accept federal funding are not covered by federal whistleblower laws. This is an critical gap to mitigate. @JeremyCorbell @disclosureorg Advancements in AI mean that biological agents could become more programmable and controllable than ever before, potentially reducing traditional constraints to bioweapons use. Commercial and critical building HVAC systems are heavily fortified against airborne threats, but exhaust vents on private apartment roofs or side walls are often completely open, unmonitored, and accessible from the air. If floodwaters reach individual apartments or building utility rooms, the ventilation system itself becomes a vector for spreading indoor air pollution. As someone who has experienced flooding in multiple apartment units and currently has an HVAC leak, this hadn't crossed my mind until today. It is one of the things that makes preventing natural disasters critical. James Giordano also wrote about drone delivery of bioweapons here. digitalcommons.ndu.edu/cgi/v… Lasers can down drones kilometers away. Or when a drone carries a hazardous aerial payload, the U.S. Military can utilize DEWs as part of a layered air defense strategy. High-power microwave (HPM) weapons emit massive, controlled bursts of electromagnetic radiation. Systems like Epirus Leonidas project an energy field rather than a narrow beam. I wish pundits worried about biosafety and health data privacy as much as scoring political points. I understand not wanting to scare the public or appear weak to adversaries, but it is strange how hard some work to downplay the risks of "biological research facilities" and laboratories. It really had the opposite effect of turning more eyes on them, for better or worse.

Gaoagwe Jeje’s system combines a biosecurity drone with a mobile app. ebx.sh/vqkvaF

I guess biosecurity is not just about humans. A parasite that hits livestock can threaten food supply, farmers, prices, and border security fast. Catching it early is homeland defense in a very real sense.

These were for pathogen monitoring and threat reduction. The labs are officially for defensive public health and biosecurity purposes. Read below. Is this true? Grok: • US government funding for biological labs in Ukraine and dozens of other countries is factual, confirmed via the Defense Threat Reduction Agency’s Biological Threat Reduction Program since 2005, with ~$200 million invested in 46 Ukrainian facilities alone for pathogen monitoring and Soviet-era threat reduction. • DNI Gabbard’s June 12, 2026 release declassifies details on over 120 such labs across 30 countries handling pathogens like anthrax and plague, aligning with prior public records while emphasizing risks like gain-of-function research and wartime vulnerabilities in Ukraine. • The labs are officially for defensive public health and biosecurity purposes per US statements, though the announcement highlights past lack of transparency and supports Trump’s executive order to curb certain overseas research. ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ @TulsiGabbard @elonmusk @realDonaldTrump

These were for pathogen monitoring and threat reduction. The labs are officially for defensive public health and biosecurity purposes. Read below. Is this true? Grok: • US government funding for biological labs in Ukraine and dozens of other countries is factual, confirmed via the Defense Threat Reduction Agency’s Biological Threat Reduction Program since 2005, with ~$200 million invested in 46 Ukrainian facilities alone for pathogen monitoring and Soviet-era threat reduction. • DNI Gabbard’s June 12, 2026 release declassifies details on over 120 such labs across 30 countries handling pathogens like anthrax and plague, aligning with prior public records while emphasizing risks like gain-of-function research and wartime vulnerabilities in Ukraine. • The labs are officially for defensive public health and biosecurity purposes per US statements, though the announcement highlights past lack of transparency and supports Trump’s executive order to curb certain overseas research.

The Coca‑Cola Company Breaks Ground on New fairlife Production Facility in Webster, NY The Coca-Cola Company’s $650 million fairlife facility in Webster, New York, is more than a manufacturing investment—it is a strategic commitment to regional economic renewal. As the largest facility of its kind in the Northeast, it strengthens dairy supply chains, creates 335 permanent jobs, supports skilled-trades employment, and reinforces confidence in Upstate New York’s advanced manufacturing potential. From a Capital Environment Theory perspective, the investment enhances regional economic resilience, strengthens competitive ecosystems, and provides Webster with a new economic anchor following decades of industrial contraction. It demonstrates how disciplined corporate investment can generate lasting economic value at both local and regional levels. coca-colacompany.com/media-c… #ThinkTank #PolicyResearch #EvidenceBasedPolicy #InternationalAffairs #Geoeconomics #GlobalGovernance #StrategicForesight #PolicyInnovation #HealthEconomics #HealthInvestment #HealthTechPolicy #DataForHealth #HealthInfrastructure #BrainData #HumanPerformanceEconomy #CapabilityEconomy #OneHealth #Biosecurity #PandemicPreparedness #AMR #AgingSocieties #GlobalNutrition #DigitalHealthTransformation #InvestmentBanking #CorporateStrategy #BusinessLeadership #GlobalFinance #FinancialServices #BankingIndustry #LeadershipChange #Management #CorporateGovernance #BusinessNews #FinanceNews #GlobalBusiness #Innovation #DecisionMaking #OrganizationalChange

On June 12, 2026, U.S. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard declassified intel confirming U.S. funding for 120 biolabs across 30 countries including Ethiopia. The release supports Trump’s EO ending risky gain-of-function research abroad and counters what Gabbard called prior cover-ups on lab scope and COVID-19 origins. Per ODNI, the declassification aligns with 2025 Executive Order: maps labs, pathogens & risks for better biosecurity , Corrects the record: previous officials (incl. Fauci) denied/downplayed them and Addresses real threats: hazardous pathogens (anthrax, plague, Ebola) with weak oversight especially in Ukraine.

17/25 ♤ Pillar 1. ▪︎Biosafety and Biosecurity ▪︎ Focus - Protecting labs from theft or accidents. ▪︎ Implementation - Upgrading facility; security; training staff on safe handling of especially dangerous pathogens. ♤ Pillar 2. ▪︎ Biosurveillance 🔻

3/25 secure old Soviet biological weapons infrastructure and safely dispose of leftover pathogens. Purpose: The Ukrainian Embassy and independent biosecurity experts reiterate that the funding was meant for "CIVILIAN PUBLIC HEALTH", @DNIGabbard improving disease surveillance, 🔻

What COVID taught us, and screw worms teach us now, is that biosecurity is 60% education, 30% policy and maybe 10% science. We know how to manage pathogens. We're just unwilling to do so.

You always miss the forest for the conspiracy trees. The core documents aren’t Russian at all. Russia seized real American contractor records in 2022, Black & Veatch DTRA contracts, lab upgrade details, pathogen permits, funding flows etc... Those were US-funded under the longstanding Biological Threat Reduction Program. Russia published them at the UN, but they were American documents showing taxpayer-supported work. Not Kremlin forgeries. Do you understand how imbecilic your core point is? Gabbard didn’t claim bioweapons production. She declassified slides on >120 US-supported labs across 30 countries, highlighted transparency failures and wartime risks, and tied it to Trump’s Gain-of-Function restrictions. Exactly what critics said in 2022 when officials downplayed it as just some harmless vet labs. Russia may have exaggerated the findings into an offensive bioweapons program aimed at them but you ignore that reframing and fixate on sourcing overlap a sloppy map, demanding takedowns over confirmed public program details. The point is that this confirms decades of dual-use biosecurity work with poor oversight which was minimized or outright dismissed as Russian propaganda by past admins.