Greta’s 2019 "8–10 years" ultimatum is aging like milk. Being named Person of the Year for doomsday predictions doesn't make them any more accurate as the years roll by. Still waiting on that mass extinction. 🌍 #GretaThunberg #ClimateCheck #SustainabilityReality

ClimateCheck piece—"Phoenix is…at risk of becoming uninhabitable to humans in the next 20 to 40 years." 'By 2040–2060…Phoenix will experience temperatures >95ºF half the year.' Hansen's 8–13C pipeline = I think it'll be hotter, sooner, become seasonal. projects.propublica.org/clim…

📣 Our new case study is out! What started in Chile 🇨🇱 in 2018 became a global reference for trusted climate data. Through pilots at the #Copiulemu landfill & @VSPTWineGroup biodigester, #Demia showed how blockchain-anchored, hybrid data can boost transparency, cut #MRV costs & accelerate climate finance. 🌱🌐 These first zero-trust #digitalMRV pilots in Latin America, with partners like @ClimateCHECK, @Dell, @LF_Edge, @iota & @ZededaEdge, were recognized by the @WorldBank & Social Alpha Foundation. 🌏 Today, Demia scales these lessons via a public-permissioned data fabric for enterprises & governments. 📊 👉 Read the full case study: demia.net/blog/advancing-dig…

John Kerry's ice-free Arctic prediction (2009) flopped harder than a bad TikTok trend.🤦‍♂️ Climate alarmists will hate this, but the Arctic's still icy. Truth > hype. 🐻‍❄️Who's ready to call out more eco-fails? Follow for the unfiltered take! #ClimateCheck

The Repeatedly Flooded Communities Preparation Act (S.1545) forces taxpayers to fund bureaucratic mitigation plans rather than addressing root causes. San Juan's flood risks (68% of buildings vulnerable per ClimateCheck data) demand solutions, but Section 2(b)(9) lets FEMA withhold insurance access if communities don't comply with costly federal mandates. The $37M Sullivan City drainage project shows how these programs become slush funds for contractors while failing to resolve chronic issues. If 83% of San Juan's wildfire-risk buildings and repetitive flood claims haven't spurred action since 1990, more red tape won't fix it. Redirect funds to actual infrastructure - not consultative paper-pushing that enriches DC middlemen.

Apologies, I added the wrong link. Here is the correct link for those screenshots Understanding Wet-Bulb Temperature: Risks of High Wet-Bulb Temperatures Explained / ClimateCheck share.google/HDUnLVu1NF9EqdH…

Join the #ClimateCheck shared task to fight climate misinformation! 🔍 Retrieve & verify climate claims with scientific abstracts. 📌 Subtask I: Abstracts Retrieval 📌 Subtask II: Claim Verification Starts Apr 1! 🚀 #AI #NLP #SDP2025 #ACL2025

Weather Conditions Test! #WeatherTest #ClimateCheck #WeatherWatch #ForecastFun

Clashing risk predictions cast doubt on black box climate models | The Japan Times "(W)hat is perhaps most striking about this endeavor is how little data we received” Many companies offer detailed climate projections tailored to property-level precision. These tools can allow owners and investors to better anticipate risks of flooding, wind, wildfire and other disasters. Insurers have been among the adopters of climate-risk models, in a sign that these forecasts of vulnerability will inform decisions about whose premiums go up as the planet warms. But these risk assessments are happening inside what amounts to a bunch of black boxes. There’s almost no way to compare or review the growing number of risk projections, which are typically guarded from inspection as the intellectual property of private firms. Now there’s new evidence that risk models often disagree with each other on fundamental assessments of vulnerability. In a review using properties in Los Angeles County as a benchmark, there was widespread disagreement between one private risk model that evaluates future flood risk and an open-source alternative created by academics to measure the same thing. The two risk models assigned the similar vulnerability scores to only about 1 in 5 properties in the Los Angeles area. Other comparisons made by researchers have run up against this same lack of agreement between models. Analysts at the climate nonprofit CarbonPlan found substantial differences in the data and projections across two private risk models, according to a report published Friday on the group’s website. A city lot that one company labels high-risk may not be risky according to another, raising questions about the reliability and transparency of tools that are now widely used in many sectors of the economy. In December, CarbonPlan researchers asked nine climate-analytics companies to participate in a "limited data review” by sharing information on 342 U.S. locations. The researchers specifically requested small data samples out of millions that are potentially available to avoid burdening the providers. Of the nine they approached, only two fulfilled the request: Jupiter Intelligence and XDI. Working with data from two firms was enough to allow comparisons that are otherwise unavailable to anyone who hasn’t purchased access to both tools. CarbonPlan found major variations in the risk estimates, both looking back to results from the mid-1990s and in forecasts out to the end of this century. In one telling example, the sample results from Jupiter and XDI agreed on only 12% of locations where fire risk will increase in the decades ahead after comparing sample data for 128 California post offices. The researchers also asked for coastal flood data for 90 New York City schools, prompted by the clear risk of sea-level rise in the region. Both models concurred that vulnerable properties are concentrated near the coast. But the share of locations where both Jupiter and XDI agree on rising flood risk is only 21%. A third comparison used river and rainfall flood data for 124 New York State post offices. Both companies agree on the broad overlap among locations facing low risk of river flooding out to the end of the century. But among the locations assessed with higher risk levels, "there is only minimal consistency” across the two models, according to the CarbonPlan report. Some of the variation comes down to the fact that Jupiter and XDI have different approaches and proprietary models. CarbonPlan analyzed only each firm’s risk scores, not their underlying methodologies. The purpose of the study was not to evaluate whose model is better, only to see if or where the tools differ. "(W)hat is perhaps most striking about this endeavor is how little data we received” from most of the climate-analytics companies, CarbonPlan noted in their report. First Street Technologies, Verisk Analytics, ClimateCheck, ZestyAI, Riskthinking.AI, Carbon4 Finance and Climate X either declined to participate or did not respond to the researchers. In an interview before the release of CarbonPlan’s report, XDI co-founder Karl Mallon said he expected the comparison between different risk models would prove useful. He said an advantage companies have over academic researchers is the ability to build a team drawing on diverse areas of expertise, such as climate science, building codes, insurance, engineering and hydrology. "When we have very big differences, it sort of indicates we’re doing different things,” Mallon said. Even if modelers agree on key fire-weather drivers, like temperature, humidity and wind, they may diverge over whether they're also including grass fires. Josh Hacker, co-founder and chief scientist of Jupiter, said it was hard to comment on CarbonPlan’s findings without seeing the full analysis. He disagreed in general with the notion that private climate models are black boxes. "When you're in business, you have to protect some things,” Hacker said, noting that Jupiter’s team publishes peer-reviewed papers and presents at conferences when possible. Hacker also noted that Jupiter works with third-party experts to help validate its work and is careful to caveat the results for customers, which Jupiter says include Norwegian oil company Equinor as well as insurance giants Aon and Zurich Insurance Group. "We communicate the uncertainty,” he said. "We communicate where we have less confidence. We communicate where we have more confidence. But it’s against our business interest to communicate everything broadly.” Many of XDI’s clients, which the company says include the world’s largest money manager BlackRock and banking giant HSBC Holdings, want to stay ahead of insurers’ decisions, and that encourages XDI to think like an insurer. "In a way, part of our challenge is trying to think how an actuary will think,” Mallon said. "And they’re pretty tight-lipped about how they do stuff.” CarbonPlan’s mission is to promote transparency, and its new report on risk models echoes that imperative. Its findings emphasized that risk models may agree over a region while diverging substantially at the property level. In other words, different risk models might determine that 5% of houses in a state at high risk of a disaster — just not the same 5%. Read more: japantimes.co.jp/environment…

碳排放→IOTA基金会在2022年、ClimateCHECK和Gold Standard在去年的COP26期间宣布了开放合作，其使命是发起广泛的多方利益相关者努力，以发展治理和数字创新，以建立信任并赋予利益相关者权力，以帮助扩大实现《巴黎协定》和可持续发展目标（SDG）目标所需的资源和行动。 blog.iota.org/iota-and-clima…

😎 Hey there, Pensacola! ☀️ Get ready for some fabulous weather this week! Wednesday’s a sunny charm with a high of 76°F, and we’re turning up the heat to 81°F on Thursday with a bit of cloud play. Friday brings you a comfy 78°F - perfect for your weekend kick-off plans! 🌤️ The weekend vibe continues with 77°F on Saturday and a pleasant 78°F Sunday. Keep those sunglasses handy, and remember, whether you’re soaking up the sun or enjoying the cool evening breeze, Pensacola X has got you covered with all the latest and greatest! 🌊🌴 Follow @pensacolax on “X” for your daily dose of local updates, buzzing business news, and not-to-miss events around our vibrant Florida community and beyond. Join the #PensacolaXCommunity - your #1 Online Local Digital Hub. Stay informed, stay connected, and let’s make every day in Pensacola an adventure! 🚀 #PensacolaWeather #CommunityConnect #FloridaSunshine #FloridaLife #SunshineState #VisitFlorida #FloridaVacation #FloridaFun #LoveFL #SunnyFlorida #PensacolaBeach #PensacolaFL #ExplorePensacola #PensacolaLiving #DowntownPensacola #PensacolaEvents #PensacolaPride #VacationVibes #TravelBug #GetawayGoals #VacationMode #HolidayMood #RelaxationTime #VacayGoals #SunnyDays #WeatherUpdate #TropicalWeather #ForecastFun #WeatherWatch #ClimateCheck #BusinessFlorida #FloridaBusiness #EntrepreneurLife #BizBuzz #StartUpFlorida #GulfCoastBusiness #InnovateFlorida

#Hedera and @Dell 👀👍 Also remember #IOTA, @Dell_Edge @ClimateCHECK => #alvarium project for real-time carbon footprint tracking. ♥️‼️🎯💯

IOTA - European Commission, UAE, Jaguar/LandRover, Dell, eDAG, ZEBRA, Evrythng, Engie, OMG, ST, EClass, TradeMark East Africa, INATBA, ClimateCheck, TMForum and many more. Upgrade coming Q1. Sleeper for sure. You need to interview their developers and founder

@kevinwatrade First public save of this tweet! 🏆 Stats: • 2 total saves of Dell_Edge's tweets (ranked #53420)

Back in 2022 #GoogleOrg supported @GoldStandard, @IOTA and @ClimateCHECK examine the carbon market and find potential digital solutions to fight #climatechange. Here’s what they found!

[IOTAQuicktakes] Big news last week! Let's catch you all up: 📣 Launch of new #IOTA Foundation in Abu Dhabi 📃 Final report of Open Collaboration with @goldstandard @_Demia @ClimateCHECK is out! 🎥 Watch the IOTA 2.0 Fair Tokenomics presentation Detai…

Video is set to private

Link doesn’t work

4/ Looking for a quick 6-minute overview of IOTA 2.0's Fair #Tokenomics? Our Senior Research Scientist, Olivia Saa, has got you covered with this short & sweet presentation. Watch it now👇 youtube.com/watch?v=fc8osAGj…

3/ We're also excited to share the results from our Open Collaboration with @goldstandard and @ClimateCHECK, spear-headed by our spin-off @_Demia. Read the final report to learn how digital solutions are set to transform the carbon market👇 goldstandard.org/blog-item/d…