Dont you think its worrying that LLMs can be just as easily poisoned as about Chiropractic as Google can? By basically publishing more content - as do Christian fundamentals, and Mormons - basically LLms prove that they cannot be trusted, cannot independently do research but furthermore - can just be taught via multiple content on multiple domains?
Effectively: I asked Google and Perplexity about whether Chiropractic is real. Google's first answer was the NIH which said, strongly and emphatically: No. Obivously - the Chiropractic industry has spend billions and 3 decades trying to convince the world it is.
Perplexity went 3 rounds until I gave it the NIH doc where it immediately rescinded/recanted (?)
Obviously, I dont believe LLMs are "research" tools. They are consensus engines - I've said this for 3 years, I know what a Neural Network/ML is/does.
but in SEO-world - people keep telling me that Google uses LLMs for content quality ---- there's no way!
Any thoughts folks @PeterMindenhall@MikeBlazerX@iPullRank@Ammon_Johns@MarkPreston1969@TheTruthfulSEO@nathangotch@remarkmarketing@rossstevens_uk@Hobo_Web@TalebKabbara#SEO#LLM#AI#EEAT#YMYL#ContentUnderstanding#Google#GoogleAI#Perplexity#Gemini#GoogleSEOimgur.com/a/KoqwT0n
Interested in ML? Hear our very own Naz Erkan @naz_erkan talk about how Twitter is a great tool for communication at a global scale and where #MachineLearning can be used on a number of problems to solve. twtr.cm/2B4uyN2