For three decades, UNICEF's Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) have produced nationally owned, internationally comparable data on children in the hardest places — from Afghanistan to Yemen, Iraq to Somalia, the State of Palestine to Ukraine. Today 35 of the 39 economies on the World Bank's fragility list take part, and 23 are fielding a survey in the current round.
What makes that possible is a model, not a one-off effort. MICS are designed and run by national statistical offices, with UNICEF technical assistance, to a common global standard — measuring the health, nutrition, learning and protection of children, women and families in a way that is comparable across countries and over time. The data belongs to the country; the standard is shared by the world.
The chart below shows the reach: 427 surveys across seven rounds since the 1990s, with the darker blue marking fragile and conflict-affected economies in every round. "Fragile" is not a synonym for "unsurveyable."
I see MICS as a foundational, nationally-owned layer of the FCV data architecture — the comparable base that faster, lighter instruments build on, not a substitute for them. Good data is a foundational infrastructure to prevention, planning and response; without it, the most vulnerable children, women and families go uncounted exactly where and when needs are greatest.
I'm at the World Bank's Fragility Forum in Washington, D.C. this week, where the data behind children in fragile settings is squarely on the table.
#FF2026 #FragilityForum #DataForChildren #MICS