Has Craig ever managed to forge a document without fucking it up? Failtoshi!

The super computer didn't exist. It's a good read from the ATO about the supercomputer scam.

C: No records from PornHub? W: No. Wanted to reach out, don't know how to. C: [none] had access to whitepaper work etc? W: They've received hate mail or death threats. Anyone involved in actual Bitcoin get threats. There are campaigns. C: You've never produced a single Satoshi email not already in the public domain. W: I've talked about lots of these, I don't have them anymore. gmx was hacked etc. All that has been taken over. C: You've never [published correspondence] W: I don't even remember my supervisors' names. C: You've never [missed] linked to Satoshi? W: Actually I have, linked to ATO etc C: [missed, people] W: They would have to be asked. C: You've raised questions around provenance for documents. W: I've not denied. On top of that, I've had conversations with Gavin. C: Cryptographic proof. W: There's no such thing other than hearsay. Even the Hal Finney one is hearsay. No such thing as cryptographic proof of identity. [ramble] C: Without [witnesses, documents], there's no proof. W: I have […] 1300 in-progress patents, 4000 pending, that in itself is evidence. Early people like Gwern tried to [missed]. Maxwell outed someone falsely because of one patent, Back too. All of them denied it. Despite all of this, no Satoshi has come forth. 20 years from now, there still won't be. If I lose this case, I will create more patents…

I'll never refer to Craig Wright as "Dr." because he spent many years falsely claiming to have earned a PhD and given his lengthy history of proven plagiarism and fraud I find the likelihood that he earned his eventual PhD honestly to be near 0.