Americathebeautiful retweeted
Jun 15
It's another blatant attack on our nation. IMO, POTUS must absolutely use the #insurrectionclause to send in the military and a run fair election. And the people who are doing the election fraud must face harsh consequences as examples.
America should not have to just accept it.
Jun 15
INSANE 🚨 Michigan election officials were ordered to destroy public election records just 7 days after certification
Federal law requires preserving records for 22 months
- Nearly 500,000 mismatched votes in Michigan
- 90,000 extra absentee ballots in Michigan
- 22,534 mismatched votes in Fulton County
- Waived signature verification requirement for absentee ballots
- Placeholder voter data used in Fulton County
- Late-night ballot surges with no chain of custody
“That’s a direct violation of U.S. Code Title 52 — This isn’t isolated. It happened in Michigan, Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and it’s still happening”
To give you some context on who’s speaking, this is Patrick Colbeck. He’s a former Michigan State Senator so he knows what he’s talking about
He even served on as Vice Chair of Elections and Government Reform Committee
1
30
26 Feb 2025
How's that working out for you, Democrats in Congress?
#InsurrectionClause
is more important than
#PeacefulTransferOfPower
1
3
76
19 Feb 2025
Well Democrats in Congress,
You’ve always said that the courts are the last line of defense defender of the rule of law….
And now the criminal dictator in chief is defying court orders.
Tell us again about the importance of a peaceful transfer of power!
#InsurrectionClause
2
6
168
29 Feb 2024
A state judge in Illinois has ruled that Donald Trump cannot appear on the primary ballot due to being disqualified under the #InsurrectionClause of the Fourteenth Amendment — the third state where this has happened, after Colorado and Maine rawstory.com/maga-freaks-out…
3
6
157
20 Jan 2024
d☭Иald j tя☭mp just filed his legal brief with the #SupremeCourt arguing that he should be #exempt from the #insurrectionclause of the #14thAmendment, which bars anyone who has “engaged in #insurrection or #rebellion” after swearing an oath of loyalty from serving as #President or any other #electiveoffice.
His argument? That he will "unleash chaos & bedlam" unless the Supreme Court overrules the decisions by #Maine #Colorado & any other state to toss him off the #ballot.
This is exactly why the founders saw fit to include the insurrection clause in the 14th Amendment in the first place -- to protect the #Constitution from a dangerous #demagogue willing to use #violence to #overthrow our #DemocraticSystem of #Government.
2
3
72
6 Jan 2024
Always great to analyze the #legallatest w @LizMacDonaldFOX on @EveningEdit I think all this #InsurrectionClause lawfare is dangerous.Don't have to support Trump to oppose all this. #formerfederalprosecutor video.foxbusiness.com/v/6344…
1
5
174
Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, the #InsurrectionClause, does not specify Trump has to be charged, tried, or convicted of insurrection to be disqualified from holding a federal office. What states such as Maine and Colorado have done is looked at the evidence & disqualified him.
39
5
912
24 Dec 2023
A former President cannot be disqualified under Article 3 of the 14th Amendment. Here's why.
There has been a lot of debate about whether [Somebody] can disqualify a former President under Article 3 of the 14th Amendment. This debate revolves around whether a former President, who has taken an oath to protect the U.S. Constitution, can be forbidden from holding any future office if found to have committed insurrection or rebellion against the United States. This constitutional debate is linked to various legal interpretations of what constitutes an "Officer of the United States," as defined in different legal contexts, including crucial Supreme Court decisions.
One such interpretation comes from Chief Justice Roberts' opinion in the Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (2010). In this case, Roberts clarified the definition of an "Officer of the United States" within the context of the Appointments Clause in Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution. According to this interpretation, an "Officer of the United States" is appointed to their position, unlike an elected role like the Presidency. This distinction is critical in understanding the application of Article 3 of the 14th Amendment, particularly in cases involving allegations of insurrection or rebellion.
The classification of officers of the United States is a fundamental aspect of the Constitution's framework for distributing federal power. Appointed officers, such as federal judges and cabinet members, are granted a portion of the nation's sovereign power. This delegation of authority is distinct from the responsibilities and powers of an elected President. Therefore, the disqualification clause in Article 3 of the 14th Amendment, which aims to penalize those who betray their oath to the Constitution by participating in insurrection or rebellion, must be viewed through this lens of constitutional roles and responsibilities.
In summary, while the President, as an elected official, may not traditionally fall under the category of "Officer of the United States" as per Chief Justice Roberts' interpretation, the broader implications of the 14th Amendment's disqualification clause remain a topic of ongoing legal and political debate, particularly in the context of actions that may constitute insurrection or rebellion against the United States.
#14thAmendment #ConstitutionalDebate #PresidentialEligibility #SupremeCourtInsights #RobertsRuling #USConstitution #PoliticalLaw #InsurrectionClause #Article3Analysis #FederalPower #OathOfOffice #GovernmentRoles #AmericanPolitics #LegalInterpretation #ConstitutionalLaw #ExecutivePower #JudicialAuthority #AppointmentsClause #USLegalSystem #HistoricalPrecedents #GovernmentAccountability #PoliticalDiscourse #LegalScholarship #ConstitutionalGovernance #AmericanDemocracy
2
4
7
456
20 Dec 2023
The Colorado Sup Ct decision on Trump is #hotgarbage & as anti-democratic a decision as I've ever seen. Plain wrong on legal reasoning re #InsurrectionClause & scary power grab. I analyzed w @CarleyShimkus @FoxNews early today. #formerfederalprosecutor tinyurl.com/2nphwhy9
11
1
7
290
14 Dec 2023
Important piece from @MyConstitution VP Praveen Fernandes on why enforcing 14th Amendment sec 3 #insurrectionclause is vital for American #democracy theusconstitution.org/news/e…
2
2
2
413
18 Nov 2023
18 Nov 2023
The Colorado State District Court, Judge Sarah B. Wallace, held tonight that the former president “engaged in an insurrection on January 6, 2021 through incitement, and that the First Amendment does not protect [his] speech." The court also held that he
1
3
3,102
1 Nov 2023
Colorado lawyers are arguing whether Trump should be barred from the 2024 presidential ballot under the "insurrection" clause. 🤔
Some say he's too old, others say he incited violence. 🤷♂️
Let's settle this once and for all! 🥊
#TrumpBarredFrom2024 #InsurrectionClause #SupremeCourtShowdown
What do you think? Comment below! 👇
Souce : pbs.org/newshour/politics/tr…
1
39
6 Sep 2023
😅😂🤣
CREWCrew is SMARTLY going after TFG in Colorado w OUR WeThePeopleUSOwners
14th Amendment InsurrectionClause🥳
"Grp sues to block TFG fm '24 ballot in Colorado citing 14th Amendment" l.smartnews.com/p-wnTPn/TuDS…
@CREWcrew
@DNCWarRoom
@RepJeffries
@SenSchumer
@harryjsisson
2
30
Fake Fight.
#BothSides
Ignore the Provokatsia and focus on removing Hawley via 14th Amendment, section 3.
#InsurrectionClause
1
3