A mini turbine blade with no supports. This is one of the latest prints from @generative_machine #5-axis printer. While others print layer by layer horizontally, they take full advantage of the multiaxis capabilities to print complex geometries. Aibuild software controls all machines across the factory floor, including LFAM robotic and gantry systems, printing in metal, polymer, and concrete. Video Credit: Vaishnavi / Aibuild / Generative Machine Company #engineering #technology #3dprinting #additivemanufacturing

I went to Cincinnati to look at a machine about 10 years ago. I was very impressed at the skill level on the shop floor. Every machine from EDM to lathe was multiaxis and every employee could program and run any of them. I asked how he assembled such a cracked team and he said, "You don't have AC, do ya?"

In 1755 a massive earthquake struck off the coast of Portugal and triggered a series of tsunamis. People who watched the waters retreat before the wave wrote at the time that they saw a city appear from under the ocean. They had no concept of what a tsunami was. They just described what they saw. A city under the water, right where a team has now spent years documenting submerged walls, carved stones and a two kilometre diameter circular structure. The site is five kilometres off the coast of Andalusia in southwest Spain. Roughly 20 metres deep with an additional 10 to 20 metres of sediment on top. A team has been diving it for years making hundreds of dives and scanning the entire area with centimetric multiaxis sonar. What appeared on the scans was not a small settlement. It was something much bigger. 🔹Site five kilometres off the Andalusian coast 🔹Submerged walls reaching 7.5 metres in height 🔹Team dates the site to 10,000 to 20,000 years old 🔹Rubble pushed north indicating a southerly impact 🔹1755 eyewitnesses described a city under the ocean 🔹Circular structure roughly two kilometres in diameter The rubble across the site has been pushed consistently northward indicating something impacted from the south. The circular concentric layout with canals matches what Plato describes in his account of Atlantis. The location matches where Plato says to look. Just outside the Straits of Hercules in the region he calls Gades. Modern day Cadiz in southwest Andalusia. Whether or not this is what Plato was describing, the 1755 eyewitnesses were standing on that coastline and they wrote down what they saw. That account has been sitting in the historical record for 270 years. What do you think is under the water off the coast of southern Spain?

See how advanced CAD/CAM turned an ambitious idea into manufacturable reality - pushing multiaxis machining, extreme material removal, and titanium beyond what’s been done before. Learn how we brought the world’s first Hollow Body Titanium Guitar to life: bit.ly/4nbZGxu

Now, we accelerate. Pulled the trigger on CAM assist for our 2 seats of Mastercam Multiaxis and 2 seats of Fusion 360 for manufacturing. We've created 4 manufacturing roles in the last 6 months and creating 3 more next month. Time to reindustrialize.

Comprehensive Physiology ☕ Monday Briefing: NEW PODCAST! 🎧 Xu et al. discuss the multiaxis #pathophysiology of #perimenopausal #endocrine disorders and suggest potential for treatments targeting #kisspeptin neurons. Listen ow.ly/a3M550YoLGy Read ow.ly/YZ5f50YoLGz

Megawatts (OTC: MMMW) recently announced a new hydroelectric s technology with a quick financial payback.  Mass Megawatts had spent a considerable amount of funds and research related to similar technology over the past 25 years.  The Company believes that the energy marketplace will have substantially less barriers to market entry than its related products that Mass Megawatts developed over the years. A new low-cost Hydroelectric Power System that can pay for itself in less than two years at the best locations. The new product can reduce costs by utilizing substantially less than fifty percent material and much less initial engineering requirements for a given rated power output than traditional hydropower plants. The Hydro Multiaxis Turbosystem (ie Hydromat) is a tower structure comprising large lattice like tower sections with many smaller blades that are connected to each axis or shaft of the unit comprised of many shafts with gearboxes and generators. Unlike the Multiaxis Turbosystem, the wind version of the Hydromat, water has 800 times more density and power for any given same velocity for both air and water. The use of stainless steel or any number of composites to support the powerful water velocity could be used as material and still be very cost competitive.

Aerospace parts demand extreme precision - especially in Titanium 6Al4V. With Mastercam toolpaths like OptiRough, Multiaxis Unified, Contour, drilling, boring, and threading, Mastercam user @darkenergyprecision delivered an incredible result. #Mastercam #ChallengeAccepted

⚡️ The Kronos S.M.A.R.T. (Superconducting Minimum-Aspect-Ratio Torus) is a paradigm shift in fusion technology. The Kronos approach implies many top notch strategies to reach net gain power generation that includes: High beta confinement (βn) in a compact spherical #tokamak with a low aspect ratio (A ≈ 2.0). Rare-earth barium copper oxide HT superconducting coils to generate magnetic fields of over 30 T (peak) & 10 T (central) engineered for 0.4% strain limit. Integrated hafnium carbo-nitride composite for tensile performance, extreme mechanical stress and thermal resilience in the reactor walls. Aneutronic fuel made of 𝐷−³𝐻𝑒 that reduce to near-zero radioactive waste and eliminate invasive protective shielding. High-performance alloy MP35N, a nickel-cobalt based multiaxis blend known for ultra-strength, toughness, and superior corrosion resistance coated with carbon-fiber over-wraps. Direct Power Conversion, which eliminates complex and costly steam turbines, pipes, coolant, and various other hardware. Kronos Fusion aims to become operational by 2036 producing electric power from fusion with 70% efficiency. Credits: @Kronos__Fusion 🔗 kronosfusionenergy.com/

Join us on Feb 18 for a focused deep dive into the release highlights: ▪️ Copilot (AI‑assisted programming) ▪️ GPU‑accelerated simulation ▪️ Extended probing ▪️ Multiaxis enhancements Want an edge with 2026.R2? Don’t miss it. Register Now: bit.ly/4bBRAdN

Pls explain how @andymilburn8’s argument is consistent with 2 bombs per fatality? 17,500 Gaza Health Ministry deaths were reported simultaneously with the Dec 9 ODNI leak to CNN of 29,000 munitions deployed, putting the Israel Air Force at 0.6 civilian fatalities per munition, before adjusting for natural deaths, combatants and other causes of death, whether close quarter battle or indirect fire from IDF engagements or even failed rockets from Palestinian rocket fire cells. It seems Milburn needs to account for why IAF early war missions yielded ratios that are indicative of “indiscriminate bombing” runs in the Sahara Desert, not Gaza, a densely populated 365 sq km enclave with over two million residents. As it stands that statistic is difficult to square with much of his analysis about tech, precision or intent. One would have to hold that IAF pilots can’t aim if they intended to destroy through unproportionate attacks without adequate precautions and distinction, yet killed one per two 500 or 2,000 pound bombs deployed--and that’s not possible in Gaza. If they didn’t know precisely where their mk82 and 84s are going to fall and the pattern of life on target, we wouldn’t see such ratios. A single misplaced 500 lb mk82 can easily kill a dozen or two dozen people. A two ton mk84 can do considerably worse with its lethal blast overpressure radius of around 16-30 m, lethal frag radius of about 120 m and danger close designation of 500m for friendlies without a conversion kit like the Spice or jdam kits and 250 with. How does dropping 29,000 of these heavy munutions but killing one person for every two dropped in densely built up terrain sit with Milburn’s analysis? Not seeing it. That stats is consistent with preclearing booby trapped and tunnelized urban terrain for division scale ground maneuver. When the embedded force, a) wields 50 and 62 caliber antimaterial sniper rifles, with 800m to 1.8km range packing 15,000 to 32,000 Joules of energy at impact, b) effects coordinated fires of over ten thousands rockets, shells and drones in a multiaxis assault aimed at civilians in major urban centers, c) while holding 250 plus hostages and using their own civilians as sacrificial shields, d) *as a war concept*, to maximize civilian risk, that’s what it looks like when the defending army ground maneuvers multiple divisions to clear them out in built up sectors. There’s a lot more war data to analyze, but this one cross section sticks out like a sore thumb in Milburn’s and your own assessment. Put simply, if the empirical data from Odni and Hamas’s own GHM of the early IAF bombing ops contradict the assessment, how does one explain the IAF as unique outlier but assume otherwise systemic divergence? This is also at least prima facie inconsistent with your assumptions about 80% plus civ ratio, which distorts the IDF leaks of 7,900 combatant names last May. That number didn’t demonstrate comb/noncomb ratio. It only showed limited name identification of combatants but doesn’t account for unnamed combatants or ad hoc participants in hostilities . The analytical distinction is clear to your and Milburn’s profession, yet both elide analysis of this aspect. There are other flawed assumptions throughout Milburn’s analysis, such as overlooking the multiple documented examples of aborted IAF and IDF missions when civilians were detected on in the area, and there are numerous documented instances of this operational restraint. Same goes for the ‘analysis’ of IDF’s historic precautionary efforts of setting up humanitarian evacuation corridors and implementing tactical pauses to move civilians out of harms way after publishing their own GRGs and announcing sectors they intend to clear ahead of time. As for al-mawasi, the UNSG himself lambasted Pal militants for firing rockets from within that 14sq km humanitarian safe zone. In any case, the whole line of argumentation reads lopsided rather than objective or dispassionate analysis. [txt wall end]

Can you explain how @andymilburn8’s argument is consistent with two bombs per fatality? 17,500 Gaza Health Ministry deaths were reported simultaneously with the Dec 9 ODNI leak to CNN of 29,000 munitions deployed, putting the Israel Air Force at 0.6 civilian fatalities per munition, before adjusting for natural deaths, combatants and other causes of death, whether close quarter battle or indirect fire from IDF engagements or even failed rockets from Palestinian rocket fire cells. It seems Milburn needs to account for why IAF early war missions yielded ratios that are indicative of “indiscriminate bombing” runs in the Sahara Desert, not Gaza, a densely populated 365 sq km enclave with over two million residents. As it stands that statistic is difficult to square with much of his analysis about tech, precision or intent. One would have to hold that IAF pilots can’t aim if they intended to destroy through unproportionate attacks without adequate precautions and distinction, yet killed one per two 500 or 2,000 pound bombs deployed--and that’s not possible in Gaza. If they didn’t know precisely where their mk82 and 84s are going to fall and the pattern of life on target, we wouldn’t see such ratios. A single misplaced 500 lb mk82 can easily kill a dozen or two dozen people. A two ton mk84 can do considerably worse with its lethal blast overpressure radius of around 16-30 m, lethal frag radius of about 120 m and danger close designation of 500m for friendlies without a conversion kit like the Spice or jdam kits and 250 with. How does dropping 29,000 of these heavy munutions but killing one person for every two dropped in densely built up terrain sit with Milburn’s analysis? Not seeing it. That stats is consistent with preclearing booby trapped and tunnelized urban terrain for division scale ground maneuver. When the embedded force, a) wields 50 and 62 caliber antimaterial sniper rifles, with 800m to 1.8km range packing 15,000 to 32,000 Joules of energy at impact, b) effects coordinated fires tens of thousands of rockets, shells and drones in a multiaxis assault aimed at civilians in major urban centers, c) while holding 250 plus hostages and using their own civilians as sacrificial shields, d) *as a war concept*, to maximize civilian risk, that’s what it looks like when the defending army ground maneuvers multiple divisions to clear them out in built up sectors. There’s a lot more war data to analyze, but this one cross section sticks out like a sore thumb in Milburn’s and your own assessment. Put simply, if the empirical data from Odni and Hamas’s own GHM of the early IAF bombing ops contradict the assessment, how does one explain the IAF as unique outlier but assume otherwise systemic divergence? This is also at least prima facie inconsistent with your assumptions about 80% plus civ ratio, which distorts the IDF leaks of 7,900 names last May. That number didn’t demonstrate comb/noncomb ratio. It only showed limited name identification of combatants but doesn’t account for unnamed combatants or ad hoc participants in hostilities . The analytical distinction is clear to your and Milburn’s profession, yet both elide analysis of this aspect. There are other flawed assumptions throughout Milburn’s analysis, such as overlooking the multiple documented examples of aborted IAF and IDF missions when civilians were detected on in the area, and there are numerous documented instances of this operational restraint. The same goes for the analysis of the IDF’s historic efforts at precaution such as setting up humanitarian evacuation corridors and implementing tactical pauses to move civilians out of harms way after publishing their own GRGs and announcing the sectors they intend to clear ahead of time. As for al-mawasi, the UNSG himself lambasted Pal militants for firing rockets from within that 14sq km humanitarian safe zone. In any case, the whole line of argumentation reads lopsided rather than objective or dispassionate analysis.

From 3‑axis to full multiaxis, solid workholding and fixturing make all the difference. Mastercam lets you import models, add fixtures, and simulate with confidence. Fewer surprises, smarter decisions, safer machining. #Mastercam #TheGundCompany #ChallengeAccepted

The expansive laydown of U.S. maritime and aerial power stretching from the Eastern Mediterranean to the Indian Ocean as on January 23, 2026, indicates a strategic evolution far beyond routine force management. This deliberate positioning of American assets represents a mature operationalization of distributed lethality across the European and Central Command theaters. Washington is not merely preparing for a single contingency but is effectively engineering a kill box that spans the entire region. This layout suggests a fundamental shift in how the United States intends to manage the Iranian security dilemma and the destabilization in Syria by moving from symbolic presence to credible and high volume standoff strike capability. The most significant indicator of this strategic shift is the operational decoupling of the Persian Gulf. By positioning the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group in the Northern Arabian Sea and Indian Ocean instead of inside the restrictive waters of the Gulf itself, the U.S. Navy negates the asymmetric advantages held by Iran, such as swarm boats and coastal antiship missiles. The carrier now serves as a mobile sovereign airfield capable of projecting power into Iran or the Red Sea without being held hostage within the littoral limits of the Strait of Hormuz. Simultaneously, the deployment of Littoral Combat Ships like the USS Tulsa and USS Canberra inside the Gulf suggests a calculated division of labor where lighter and expendable assets manage daily policing while heavy destroyers and capital ships remain free for advanced kinetic tasking. This arrangement is underpinned by a clear message of deterrence through capacity. The explicit quantification of vertical launch system cells totaling over a thousand when combining the Mediterranean and Central Command assets signals a preparedness for saturation strikes. The presence of the USS Georgia in the Eastern Mediterranean is pivotal here. As a guided missile submarine capable of carrying 154 Tomahawks, it effectively connects the European and Middle Eastern theaters and provides the ability to strike targets in Syria, Lebanon or western Iran from the Mediterranean. This multiaxis threat forces Iranian planners to defend their airspace from the west and the south simultaneously which stretches their integrated air defense systems to the breaking point. Furthermore, the heavy naval presence in the Eastern Mediterranean imposes a rigid ceiling on escalation in Syria. With the USS Georgia and multiple Aegis destroyers on station, the United States has created an exclusionary zone that covers the Levant. This allows Washington to dictate the tempo of ongoing developments in Syria while likely countering Russian or Iranian entrenchment without requiring a massive ground footprint. The air assets deployed to Jordan and Qatar act as the anvil to this naval hammer and ensure that any localized crisis can be suppressed rapidly. Ultimately this posture points toward a gradual but decisive reconfiguration of the regional security architecture. The Gulf is no longer treated as a standalone theater but is integrated into a wider strategic arc. By relying on maritime standoff capabilities and forward deployed fifth generation air power, Washington is reducing its dependence on vulnerable regional land bases that are politically sensitive to host nation dynamics. The United States has effectively moved from a strategy of boots on the ground to one of missiles in the water aimed at containing Iran and reassuring partners not through occupation but through the demonstrable capacity to dismantle adversary infrastructure from a safe distance.

🚀 Mastercam 2026 R2 is almost here - bringing faster GPU simulation, smarter Copilot tools, multiaxis upgrades, and expanded probing support. Get an exclusive first look TOMORROW at 11 AM ET! 🔗 Learn what’s new register: bit.ly/450BPJf

The second release of Mastercam 2026 is coming - built for precision and performance. Join our webinar to explore: ✅ GPU-Accelerated Simulation ✅ Mastercam Copilot ✅ Advanced Multiaxis Toolpaths ✅ Probing Support & more 📅 Jan 7 | 🕑 11 AM ET 🔗 bit.ly/4pfMgzO

🎁 Holiday Challenge Accepted! We machined an aluminum gift box with an intricate bow and removable lid, using the latest and upcoming #Mastercam innovations: ✅ Upcoming GPU Simulation ✅ Advanced surfacing ✅ Multiaxis deburring ✅ All-New Streamlined interface

I bet someone invested a Billion dollars into this robot dishwasher meanwhile I have the world's only multiaxis gene therapy proven in a human and I don't even get to sleep a full night past a severely Autistic toddler.

We're on the cusp of true multiaxis 3D printing. Soon, the concept of support structures won't be necessary at all for FDM.

Tommy's Podcast feat. Grey - Episode #1,738 - SPIN PROGRAMMING ( youtu.be/1o4iBad4Fl4?si=XOe_… ) A need to know gritty expose -- from how spiral symbology functions as not only a covert marker for pedo rings but also as a subconscious reinforcement trauma trigger for victims who have underwent spin programming... a no mark torture and brainwashing method that has roots in psychiatry -- to how this fits into national security blanketed clandestine service managed programs which farm out the base conditioning of hopeful child assets to pedo proxies in order to generate a pool of viable candidates to draw from for further training as sleeper/spy assets. Also delved into is the crossover of techniques utilized in military and aerospace for training/conditioning pilots and astronauts, and the synthesizing of base effects by microwave weapons in neurowarfare. (Outline) Spin Programming and Historical Origins: - Explanation of spin programming as mind control technique. - Connection to spiral symbology and pedophile rings as covert markers. - Early history traced back to late 18th century with Eramus Darwin (Charles Darwin’s grandfather). - Development of rotative couch/spinning apparatus for psychiatric patients by Joseph Mason Cox. - Use of spinning in asylums (1810-1840), primarily in Europe, to induce vertigo, nausea, and obedience. - Spinning as brutal, no-mark torture causing extreme physical distress but leaving few physical signs. Spin Programming as Systematic Mind Control: - 1993 paper on spin programming as a newly uncovered mind control technique. - Use with dissociative identity disorder (DID) patients and ritual abuse survivors. - Children as young as 3-4 spun on machines, sometimes drugged, exposed to flashing lights and music. - Cognitive training and visualization (tornadoes, spirals) used to induce dissociative states. - Spiral symbology as both covert pedophile marker and subconscious trauma trigger reinforcing compliance. - Spin programming as foundational in organized abuse rings and trafficking networks. Government Involvement & National Security Implications: - Discussion on CIA and proxies infiltrating and manipulating pedophile rings. - Use of spin programming techniques for asset creation and control. - Trauma bonding and abuse used to create sleeper spies and controllable assets. - Distinction between field operatives and bureaucratic overseers enabling abuse for “national security.” - Critique of globalist control and lack of oversight in these programs. Military, Aerospace, and Technological Applications: - Spin programming principles adapted into aerospace training (human centrifuges). - Early centrifuge use linked to Darwin’s designs and German aeronautical research. - NASA’s origins connected to German research; use of centrifuges for physical and psychological conditioning. - Mention of Andrija Puharich, mind control researcher linked to MK Ultra and “space kids.” - Spectrum of use: from ethical pilot training to sinister brainwashing of assets. - Use of multiaxis trainers and centrifuges for conditioning pilots and astronauts. Modern Neurowarfare & Remote Mind Control Technologies: - Reference to Dr. James Gordano’s 2018 neurowarfare lecture. - Development of remote-directed energy weapons causing vestibular disruption and cognitive impairment. - Parallels to spin programming effects: disorientation, dissociation, compliance. - Use of these microwave weapons linked to phenomena like Havana syndrome. - Brain targeting to manipulate balance and cognition without physical contact. Ethical Reflections and Call to Awareness: - Discussion of moral repugnance of using children in such programs. - Acknowledgement of some military uses of conditioning as necessary but distinct from abuse. - Importance of raising awareness and shifting the Overton window on taboo topics. - Encouragement to engage, share information, and resist helplessness. - Comparison to historical conspiracies once relegated to “crazy” now accepted facts. - Emphasis on individual responsibility to act and not be willfully ignorant. - Final reflections on the importance of small contributions and collective awareness. Support those willing to go there, for the people. Subscribe to Tommy's Podcast, now back on YouTube. TPC #1,738 youtu.be/1o4iBad4Fl4?si=XOe_…