Why are Quebec police calling gun owners' spouses? The Sûreté du Québec has launched an initiative that sees officers contacting the spouses of licensed firearms owners to ask about possible domestic violence concerns. What if the police called your spouse tomorrow and asked whether you might become violent someday? Not because you'd committed a crime. Not because anyone had filed a complaint. Not because there was evidence against you. Just because you legally owned something that the government doesn't like. That's exactly what's happening in Quebec. This week, the Carney Liberals quietly extended their gun ban amnesty once again, delaying implementation of the federal confiscation scheme until 90 days after the Supreme Court of Canada hears the Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights challenge to the 2020 gun ban. By the time this whole mess winds through the court, it will be seven and a half years after hundreds of thousands of previously legal firearms were prohibited by Order-in-Council. Thankfully, the government still hasn't managed to complete its confiscation program, and Canadians are still waiting to learn whether the ban itself was lawful. At the same time, Quebec police are targeting licensed gun owners in a different way. The Sûreté du Québec has launched an initiative that sees officers contacting the spouses of licensed firearms owners to ask about possible domestic violence concerns. The problem? Canada already has extensive laws allowing authorities to intervene when there are genuine safety concerns. Police can seize firearms, licences can be suspended or revoked, courts can issue protection orders, and red-flag laws already allow firearms to be removed before violence occurs. So why are police investigating people who haven't been accused of any wrongdoing? @SheilaGunnReid

I like when someone else puts Alan in his place, and is quickly blocked by him. Alan posted a story about US veteran suicide and guns, then was upset when Canadian data showed hanging was the #1 method for veterans in Canada. He then claimed to be “laser focused” on Canada! 🤣

The latest reminder of the Liberals’ firearm confiscation failure. Police don’t want it. Canada Post doesn’t want it. Several premiers don’t want it. And the millions of trained, tested, and vetted Canadian firearm owners don’t want it. Instead of spending $750 million to target hunters, farmers, and sport shooters, the Liberals should cancel this confiscation regime and focus on going after the real criminals.

The number is actually 5,162 GSG-16’s on the list. It’s weirdly listed more than once. Almost 12,000 on the list are .22’s.

Meanwhile, Gary is slobbering over a bunch of previously legal .22 plinkers 🇨🇦🆘

If Carney can use handguns for self defence in public shouldn't the rest of us be able to?

We "feel" targeted? What else do you call it when your harmless sport and your peaceful community is purposefully obliterated by the government under threat of criminal prosecution? Oh right... "common sense".

Poly quote the RCMP that Ontario and Quebec produce similar statistics on their own. That’s a straight up lie. Photo 2 is straight from the Ontario governments website, quoting 90% of crime guns are smuggled. Who lied in that quote? Poly, RCMP or both? news.ontario.ca/en/release/1…

What an absolute farce of a program. .22 plinkers being banned and confiscated does nothing for public safety. It's time to end this nonsense.

LIBERAL GUN-CONFISCATION ANALYSIS FROM Q-1113 Claude AAA (AI-Assisted Analysis) Highlights - Strikingly low signups (already known) - Most-claimed model: GSG-16 (.22) - 19%: 9 mm PCCs - 18%: .22 rimfire kids/plinker/gopher guns ASFCP = GASLIE-T (The Great "aSsAuLt-StYlE" Lie)