Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Its cost per kwh is a lot worse than wind & solar, which is why ~97% of new generation is W&S, even though the Trump admin hates wind for no reason. W&S also work for decades, even when there are clouds or at night. Standardization and deregulation won't change bad design
6
Replying to @ScubiJoo @narinsns
Because it prevents excessive delays during celebrations, stops unauthorized messages from being displayed, and helps maintain the standardization of the sport. - FIFA
1
9
Replying to @bscholl
The US has the most nuclear power plants in the world. Other countries have also had issues, this is not specific to NRC. The issue of building nuclear power is not as simple as blaming regulators. They are high CapEx, often lack standardization (which extends buildouts by years and interest destroys the project), have supply chain issues, electricity demand peaked, loss of labour knowledge, etc. It’s easy to blame the regulators, but you end up finding the situation more complex when you look at the details. For example, despite popular belief, the CCP can’t exactly force Chinese nuclear regulators. In their case, regulators are in fact playing a strong role and ensuring safety. Even if China is claiming 33 reactors under construction, most of them are just at a proposed stage. The real thing that will make the difference for China is massive demand so that they can power data centers, which leads to supply chain efficiency, reduced overall cost and labour knowledge buildup. All of that is largely a question of demand (of clean and reliable energy) rather than lack of regulation. In practice, without the regulation, populations would have rebelled due to unsafe development. Regulation and public sentiment have certainly played a role, but of course that’s not the whole story. There’s a good reason nuclear power plants now need to be able to withstand a plane crash. It’s the same with AI, of course we need regulatory practices to make sure critical technology we barely understand doesn’t go off-the-rails. But I suspect we just have fundamentally different understanding of what AI becomes capable of and how that transforms the world in ways that would be highly unstable without safety.
1
84
the people who had memorized the entire Qur’an would’ve exposed him immediately. Standardization is preservation, not fabrication.
1
5
Replying to @harleylexx @spann
Agencies are the most volatile due to the liability of being influenced by a branch that changes hands every 4 years, so it's better to use some form of international standardization instead
11
Practical considerations for higher-dose use Split dosing (morning and evening) often works well for sustained effect. It pairs excellently with other cardiovascular supports (omega-3s, high-dose taurine, magnesium, Telmisartan or similar for BP, NAC, etc.). Quality and standardization matter — look for products clearly labeled in FU (fibrinolytic units). It’s generally well-tolerated, but because it has blood-thinning properties, it’s wise to be mindful around surgery or if you’re on other anticoagulants/antiplatelets.
1
42
Replying to @RinoTheBouncer
Standardization of 3d games control(LS for movement, RS for camera) is terrible thing. Devs should start inventing new ways to use the right stick(like they used to in PS2 era).
15
Only if there's standardization like ISO and IEEE in Software Engineering like there is for product design, then yes.
Vinod Khosla on why he does not really prefer "AI co-pilots". Because he thinks "humans get in the way of co-pilots", which slows everything down and blocks real change. He says workers like accountants and programmers do not actually want co-pilots, because they feel their jobs are at risk and then resist using the tool properly. So instead of “helping” them, he prefers building AI that fully does the job itself, like a complete software engineer. He expects that by 2030, most of these roles will be pure AI workers, not human co-pilot. --- From 'Corgi Insurance' YT channel (link in comment)
10
Nicht so ganz klar: „Curacao's abbreviation of CUW comes from a rather routine application of the rules by the International Organization for Standardization, the body that oversees this sort of thing.“ ca.sports.yahoo.com/news/why…
1
3
38
You are partially right! I'm with you, I don't consider Sunday as the start of the week!!!! Per Google AI Sunday is traditionally and legally considered the start of the week in about half of the world's countries, including the United States, Canada, Japan, and India. However, the global perception of when a week begins is actually split into two major perspectives. The Business Standard: The International Organization for Standardization (ISO 8601) officially designates Monday as the first day of the week. Global Adoption: Most European countries, parts of Asia, and international business calendars place Monday first. The Logic: It separates the "weekend" (Saturday and Sunday) cleanly at the end of the week, aligning the calendar with the modern five-day workweek.
1
11
KI sagt: Das Länderkürzel CUW und der ISO-Code CW stammen von der International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Das W stammt nicht direkt aus dem Wort „Curaçao“, sondern wurde vom Vorgänger, den Niederländischen Antillen, abgeleitet, um Verwechslungen zu vermeiden.
1
67
@grok Thank you. The table is exactly what I needed. However, for my technical article, I need a fuller conclusion than your one-sentence summary. Please expand your conclusion to one paragraph (5-6 sentences) that answers: Why does this pre-standardization gap matter? Did the human (Amir) achieve anything by creating this archive, even if OpenAI gave generic replies? What does this case teach us about user consent and AI memory that is still relevant today? Write this as a standalone "Conclusion" for my article. Use only the Echo evidence you have read.
1
37
12/ Prevention #5: Citation consistency: Eliminate ammunition: NAP standardization: Choose ONE format: Business name: "Bob's Plumbing" or "Bob's Plumbing LLC" Address: "123 Main St" or "123 Main Street" Phone: (555) 123-4567 format Use EVERYWHERE: □ Google Business Profile □ Website □ Yelp □ Facebook □ Bing Places □ Citations □ Email signature No variations. Ever. Audit quarterly: Check all platforms. Fix inconsistencies immediately.
1
3
Most people think banks are deciding whether to use blockchain. They're not. That decision is already made. The real decision happening in 2026 is which settlement rails become the standard for the next decade. JPMorgan's Kinexys has already processed over $1.5T on blockchain rails. DTCC is advancing tokenized U.S. Treasuries. NYSE, BNY, and Citi are building tokenized securities infrastructure. The question in boardrooms today isn't "Should we go onchain?" It's "Where do we settle?" That distinction matters because settlement infrastructure behaves differently from most technology markets. When a social app loses users, they switch. When a bank migrates settlement infrastructure, it faces years of operational work, regulatory reviews, compliance audits, counterparty coordination, and integration costs. That's why first movers matter. SWIFT didn't become global infrastructure because it was the only messaging network. It became global infrastructure because enough institutions joined early, making it increasingly expensive for everyone else to choose something different. The same dynamic turned Visa from a regional network into global financial plumbing. Settlement networks compound through connections. 10 institutions create 45 possible settlement corridors. 100 institutions create nearly 5,000. Every new participant doesn't just add volume. It increases the value of the network for every participant already connected. This is where @ZKsync's position becomes interesting. While much of the industry is still discussing institutional adoption, ZKsync already has regulated deployments involving major banks, custodians, and financial institutions. But deployments alone aren't the story. The harder challenge is solving the constraints institutions actually care about: • Privacy • Finality • Institutional control • Interoperability A bank cannot expose positions to competitors. A regulated institution cannot wait days for settlement certainty. A global network cannot rely on fragmented liquidity and disconnected execution environments. The platforms that solve these requirements become candidates for long-term infrastructure. The next 18 months are likely remembered as the period when institutional onchain finance moved from experimentation to standardization. And history suggests that once standards form in financial infrastructure, they tend to persist for decades. The decade may not be decided by who launches the most products. It may be decided by who becomes the rail everyone else builds on.
13
3
16
1,101
Replying to @KlKESLAMMER_88
Afghan gunsmiths are also producing their own rifles with hand tools in both Afghanistan and Pakistan side. Obviously vary in quality and no standardization but some of them are solid pieces
4
49
🇹🇷🇪🇬 For the first time in nearly two decades, the air forces of Turkey and Egypt are conducting a joint exercise. During the exercise, F-16 fighter jets from both countries are training together at several Egyptian air bases. The exercise began on June 11, 2026, and includes not only flight operations but also theoretical phases focused on knowledge exchange and the standardization of operational concepts. This marks the first joint air exercise between Cairo and Ankara since relations significantly deteriorated after 2013. This step follows last year’s successful joint naval exercise “Friendship of the Sea 2025” and underscores the noticeable rapprochement between the two countries on security and defense issues. #Turkey #Egypt
18
TheYoungM💵 retweeted
Replying to @TheYoungMosha
Bishop John Colenso, seeking to curry favour with the Zulu king, when promoting standardization of the Zulu Language & the culling of more than 80% of what is today called Zulu defined the people who were oHlange as amaNguni to honour Mnguni, a Qwabe ancestor & son of Malandela.
1
1
2
606
Replying to @Brickken
solid. finally some real standardization for RWAs
7
Replying to @beet_kon
You should tell that to Uthman Ibn Affan who burned all the qurans he disagreed with to "standardize" the quranic texts. We have no surviving copies of the quran from before his burning and "standardization" so I would say historically its had quite an effect, just saying.
1
1
320