असहमति लोकतंत्र का हिस्सा है, लेकिन क्या प्रधानमंत्री मोदी की मृत्यु कामना करना स्वीकार्य है? मैं आप से पूछता हूँ ?

The central question is not what can be struck, but to what end. Targeting critical infrastructure in Iran is unlikely to produce the political effects some anticipate. Such strikes will not drive mass unrest, compel Tehran to capitulate, or halt its missile campaign. If anything, they risk reinforcing regime cohesion while accelerating a broader regional escalation. The immediate consequences would likely include a sharp rise in global energy prices particularly as tensions spill into key maritime chokepoints such as the Bab el-Mandeb, where Houthi activity is already poised to intensify. To be sure, infrastructure strikes would impose significant costs on Iran. But Tehran has consistently demonstrated its capacity and willingness to externalize those costs. Retaliation would likely extend beyond direct confrontation, targeting Gulf states, energy flows, and critical nodes of the global economy. In this sense, the effects would not remain contained but would reverberate across international markets and security architectures. Crucially, such an approach rests on a flawed assumption: that a “decisive blow” can fundamentally alter Iran’s strategic calculus. There is little evidence to support this view. The Iranian leadership operates according to a set of ideological and security imperatives that are resilient to external pressure, particularly when that pressure takes the form of overt military escalation. What emerges, then, is not a pathway to conflict termination, but a trajectory toward expansion, one that increases costs, uncertainty, and systemic risk without delivering a clear strategic end state. The more pressing question, therefore, is not how far escalation can go, but where it ultimately leads and whether that destination serves broader regional and international interests. #iran

Oh, My Dear @NobelPrize Committee, how could we possibly delay any longer? Kindly please give #NobelPeacePrize to #DonaldTrump @realDonaldTrump for his massive and huge following achievements (also watch below attached 4clips & thread) : 👇 1. In this glittering age of "stable geniuses" and midnight tweets, I implore you, nay, demand you to rush, sprint, teleport if necessary, and slap that Nobel Peace Prize right onto the spray-tanned lapel of Megalomaniac Dictator Donald J. Trump. Because, truly, who else has so brilliantly redefined "peace" as a chaotic blend of invasions, kidnappings, bombings, shady deals, economic bullying, and playground taunts? It's not warmongering; it's "winning" on a global scale! Let's unpack his "noble" feats, shall we? They're like a greatest hits album of international blunders, remixed for maximum sarcasm. 2. Starting strong with the Venezuela extravaganza: Invading a sovereign nation? Chef's kiss! Swooping in like a discount conquistador to "secure" their oil while forcing them to buy only American widgets with their own cash, pure "art of the deal" magic. And kidnapping the Venezuelan President? Inspired! Why bother with boring old diplomacy when you can turn world leaders into pawns in your personal game of thrones? It's not abduction; it's just "relocating talent" to Mar-a-Lago for some unsolicited advice. 3. Then there's the Iran bombing bonanza,spectacular! Dropping explosives faster than you can say "fake news" because, apparently, peace means preemptively turning tensions into craters. Evidence? Who needs it when you've got "gut feelings" and Fox News? It's the kind of "tough stance" that leaves the world wondering if the Nobel is for Peace or Pyrotechnics. 4. Oh, but the crooked, mysterious deals with terrorist-hotbed havens like Pakistan, Syria, and Qatar? Masterclass in grift! Twisting alliances into family business opportunities, maybe a Trump-branded resort amid the ruins, or exclusive licensing for golden toilets in bunkers? These aren't shadowy pacts benefiting the Trump empire at the expense of global security; they're "smart business" that keeps the world safe... for profit margins. Who knew "peace" could fund so many golf courses? 5. And let's not forget the bullying of India with those "stupid tariffs",brilliant! Slapping on trade barriers that sound tough but, plot twist, get paid by American consumers in the end. It's like robbing Peter to pay Paul, except Peter's your own voters and Paul's your ego. "America First," indeed first in line for higher prices on everything from motorcycles to mangoes. What a way to "protect" the economy: by making your citizens foot the bill for your vendettas. 6. Finally, the cherry on this clown sundae: speaking like a cheap joker, making childish fun of PM Narendra Modi. Priceless! Mimicking accents, tossing out nicknames like a third-grader on recess, because nothing screams "statesman" like turning international summits into stand-up comedy roasts. "Namaste" meets "you're fired," all while pretending it's "just locker room talk." How "presidential" to belittle a leader of 1.4 billion people; it's not immaturity, it's "straight talk" from the man who can't spell "covfefe." 7. Nobel Committee, act now! This titan of turmoil has earned his prize through sheer audacity. Ignore the naysayers calling it authoritarianism, recklessness, or just plain idiocy, they're all "haters and losers." Award him before he "makes peace great again" by turning the ceremony into a pay-per-view rally. The world is "tremendously" grateful... or at least entertained by the Trump childish and stupid circus. #NobelForTrump #PeaceThroughChaos #NobelPrize