Im loving this explatory conversation? Have you had any such conversation before? Do you have secret AI baby mommas you havent shared? 😉

Study Notes - (Hastings Dictionary) Redeemer, Redemption REDEEMER, REDEMPTION.—Redemption means in strictness deliverance by payment of a price or ransom, hence, metaphorically, at any great cost or sacrifice; but in the OT, outside the Law (especially in Deut., Psalms, Isaiah), is often used also of deliverance simply, as from oppression, violence, sickness, captivity, death—redemption by power. The typical redemption in the OT was the deliverance of Israel from Egypt (cf. Isa_51:9-11). Two words, with their derivatives, are used in the OT to express the idea. The one, gâ’al (from which gâ’âl, ‘redeemer’), is used technically of redemption of ant inheritance, of tithes, and the like: in a wider sense it is a favourite term in the later Psalms and Deutero-Isaiah. The other, pâdhâh, is frequent in Deut. and in the earlier Psalms. The gô’el is the kinsman who has the right to redeem; the term is used also of the ‘avenger of blood’ (Num_35:12 etc.); elsewhere, as in Job_19:25, Psa_19:14 etc., but especially in Deutero-Isaiah, it denotes Jehovah as the vindicator, deliverer, and avenger of His people (cf. Isa_40:14; Isa_43:14 etc.). The NT, likewise, employs two words—one agorazô, ‘to buy or purchase’ (1Co_6:20; 1Co_7:23, 2Pe_2:1, Rev_5:9; Rev_14:3-4; St. Paul uses a compound form in Gal_3:13; Gal_4:5); the other, and more usual, lutroumai (from lutron, ‘a ransom’), and its derivatives. The special Pauline word for redemption is apolutrôsis (Rom_3:24; Rom_8:23, 1Co_1:30, Eph_1:7 etc.). In Rom_11:26 ‘Deliverer’ is used for the OT ‘Redeemer’ (Isa_59:20). In pious circles in Israel the coming Messianic salvation was viewed as a ‘redemption’ (Luk_2:38), in which, possibly, political deliverance was Included, but in which the main blessings were spiritual—knowledge of salvation, remission of sins, holiness, guidance, peace (Luk_1:74-79). In Christ’s own teaching the political aspect altogether disappears, and the salvation He brings in is something wholly spiritual. He connects it with His Person, and in certain well-known passages with His death (Jhn_3:14-16; Jhn_6:51-56, Mat_20:28 || and Mat_26:26-28 || etc.). In the Apostolic teaching (Acts, Paul, Peter, Heb., Rev.) Christ’s work is distinctively a ‘redemption.’ Redemption, moreover, is not used here simply in the general sense of deliverance, but with definite emphasis on the idea of purchase (Act_20:28, 1Co_6:20, Eph_1:7, 1Ti_2:9, 1Pe_1:18-19, Rev_5:9 etc.). This glances back to Christ’s own saying that He came ‘to give his life a ransom (lutron; cf. antilutron in 1Ti_2:6) for many’ (Mat_20:28). Further, ‘ransom,’ ‘price,’ ‘purchase,’ ‘redeem,’ are not to be taken simply figuratively, in the sense that Christ has procured salvation for us at the cost of great suffering, even of death, to Himself. This is true; but the consensus of Apostolic teaching gives a much more definite interpretation to the language; one in accordance with Christ’s own intimation. His death was an explatory sacrifice by which those who avail themselves of it are literally redeemed from the wrath of God that rested on them, and from all other effects of sin. It is St. Paul who works out this idea most systematically (cf. Rom_3:23-26, 2Co_5:18-21, Gal_3:10-13; Gal_4:4-5, Tit_3:14, etc.), though all the NT writers share it. The immediate effect of Christ’s redeeming death is to free from guilt and annul condemnation (Rom_8:1; Rom_8:33-34), but it carries in its train deliverance from sin in every form (from sin’s dominion, from the tyranny of Satan, from an evil world, from ‘all iniquity,’ Rom_6:1-23, Gal_1:4, Tit_2:14, Heb_2:14 etc.); ultimately from death itself (Rom_8:23). It not merely redeems from evil, but puts in possession of the highest possible good—‘eternal life’ (Rom_6:23, Eph_1:3 etc.). It is a redemption in every way complete. See, further, artt. Atonement, Propitiation, Reconciliation, Salvation. James Orr.

That was Declan Mice its pretty self explatory

TECHNOLOGY NEWSWIRE: OpenAI Model Disproves Longstanding Mathematical Conjecture  THE AI DEVELOPMENT LANDSCAPE: Maybe The Chineese Principal Of Simplicity Should Be An Artifical Intelegence Design Goal; As We Keep Building More Complex And Expesive AI Models THEORETICAL MATHEMATICS: OpenAI researchers utilized a general-purpose artificial intelligence to identify a counterexample that successfully dismantled a prevailing mathematical theory.  OpenAI recently made headlines for an impressive feat in mathematics, leading many to believe that artificial intelligence has evolved into a master mathematician capable of solving long-standing proofs. However, the reality is more nuanced and perhaps more useful: the AI did not derive a new proof, but rather discovered a counterexample that successfully dismantled a prevailing mathematical conjecture. This distinction is vital.  forbes.com/sites/lanceeliot/… In theoretical mathematics, proving a statement is an exhaustive, often impossible task, as it requires accounting for every possible scenario. Conversely, disproving a conjecture only requires finding a single, definitive counterexample. In theoretical mathematics, often referred to as pure mathematics, the focus is on abstract concepts and logical patterns rather than practical applications. It encompasses areas such as algebra, geometry, topology, and number theory, and is pursued primarily for the intellectual challenge and beauty of mathematics itself. By pivoting the AI’s focus from a constructive search to a destructive one, researchers were able to undercut a theory that many experts had long assumed to be true. openai.com/index/model-dispr… KEEP IT SIMPLE STUPID (KISS)... This event serves as a powerful lesson for how we deploy AI in professional and scientific settings. Rather than forcing AI to plow forward into the “morass” of proving complex systems are flawless, we should leverage its ability to find the cracks in our logic. Much like red-teaming in cybersecurity, using AI to hunt for edge cases—such as finding a loophole in a fraud detection system—is often more efficient and impactful than attempting to verify the entire system at once. Furthermore, this breakthrough was achieved using a general-purpose AI, suggesting that we may not always need highly specialized, expensive tools to solve complex problems. By shifting our perspective and using AI to challenge our assumptions, we can uncover insights that human intuition might miss. Ultimately, the most effective approach is not to choose between proving or disproving But to utilize AI as a versatile tool that can attack a problem from every available angle.  unusualwhales.com/news/opena… An internal, general-purpose reasoning model developed by OpenAI successfully disproved the 80-year-old Erdős planar unit distance conjecture in discrete geometry. Without specialized mathematical training, the AI independently discovered an infinite family of geometric constructions that break decades of expert consensus. Here are the specific, actionable details of the breakthrough.... The Problem: First posed by legendary mathematician Paul Erdős in 1946, the unit distance problem asks for the maximum number of pairs of points that can be exactly one unit apart in a set of \(n\) points on a flat plane. The Conjecture: For nearly eight decades, mathematicians believed that a simple square-grid arrangement was the most efficient and optimal structure for maximizing these distances. The AI Discovery: The OpenAI model successfully disproved this prevailing assumption by generating a complex, higher-dimensional construction using algebraic number theory—an approach that outperformed the classical square grid bound. Verification: The model's reasoning was detailed in an exhaustive 125-page "chain of thought" transcript. External experts, including renowned mathematicians, reviewed and verified the original proof's validity. Accessing the Research: You can read the official announcement, the abridged reasoning, and the formal proof directly on the OpenAI Discrete Geometry Breakthrough page. openai.com/index/model-dispr…  Or you can watch this explatory video here... youtube.com/watch?v=9OOGGqcI…  FILED UNDER:  #OpenAI, #AIDisprovesConjecture, #ErdosConjecture, #UnitDistanceProblem, #DiscreteGeometry, #MathBreakthrough, #Mathematics, #Counterexample, #TheoreticalMath, #PureMathematics, #ErdosProblem, #TechnologyNewswire, #ArtificialIntelligence, #MachineLearning, #MathDiscovery, #GeometryBreakthrough, #AIReasoning, #OpenAIResearch, #AI, #AlgebraicNumberTheory, #PlanarGeometry, #ScienceNews, #TechNews, #Mathematics, #AIBreakthrough, #RedTeamingAI, #ScientificDiscovery, #Science, #MathProof, #FutureOfMath

Total explatory laparotomy Tho looks like "Mechanical engineering "

誰が非難してるんです？　文系だってデータサイエンスをやる時代ですよ。うちなんてTableau、Explatoryを使えるようになって、それが強みになって採用される学生もいっぱいいます。

coralblue. self explanatory. sage. also self explatory. peach. that's the case for every friend of mine lol.

Both fucking suck And both are abuse And every single one I listed is "just talking". Just like Gender "Explatory" "Therapy" It's all meant to convert the queer, the different, into the model cіshet parroting white cultural standards like they always wanted us to

Might be time for me to do an explatory safety reminder thread on how weight gain over time can throw off your balance when riding.

Explatory ymunkoke bibke, stlaker.

"Explatory"'s a word now?? Sure it isn't just another one of your delewwwwwwwwsions, Lolpig Rick?

Might explatory a little ymunkoke this weekend.

“Explatory” isn’t a word, you fucking idiot.

[Sigh] I feel an F-35 explatory thread coming on...

📣 If We're Talking $XRP Ledger, DLT Technology, and European BONDS, Then Why is Axiology's XRPL Rooted Infrastructure Going Over Many People's Heads? 🙄 Less Than 4 Weeks Ago, Ripple's "On-Chain Economy" Featured Axiology's CEO Marius Jurgilas, Who Stated: "Axiology is Digital Asset Infrastructure That is Cutting Across Multiple "Pipes" in Capital Markets and Compressing it Into One layer on the XRP Ledger" Whats Worth Noting is Marius Uses "Government Bonds" As a Prime Example on How XRPL and Axiology Infrastructure Can Remove Intermediaries and Compress Infrastructure into "One Layer" for More Efficency and Boosted Settlement. I Shared Documentation Today on Axiology and $XRP ledger Tech Being Highlighted in The Eurosystems Explatory Work on "New Technologies For Central Bank Money Settlement" Ripple's Recent EU EMI Licence Approval May Be The Exact Stepping Stone For These Developments 🇪🇺 Watch This Space!!

He isn't fighting for the rights of those meritorious kids who already reached iit despite of reservation. fight is for those who can't get in IIT right now due to res. And end up going to pvt college despite of having Higher IQ. Hope this is explatory enough for ur understanding

Good Morning Besties A simple yield app could be next catalyzer to onboard billions. Now there is a very simple and great yield app. @YieldNestFi offers simple, high yielding risk adjusted restaking defi strategies. It merges all of the best defi strategies into very easy assets. Right now one of my favourite yield finding app @Liquidity_Land and yieldnest partnered. They now deliver 11% on USC via ynRWAx with an additional 1% bonus APY for users ynRWAx one of the most stable, secure and risk-adjusted yield opportnity in Defi and RWA space. In addition its possible to poos APY up to 50% with pools on curve and pendle RWA space is still in explatory stage so it might be good to be early for onchain presence too.

It's true but it was an explatory offer, It wasn't a job offer, We offered Stephan a similar thing at a similar time to be apart of a discretionary group to then go on and get the job, there are a couple other EFL Managers and even a (at the time) PL manager that was apart of it

Currently worth $62 million USD. Worth a explatory conversation at minimum @nikitabier

That's cool. I might agree with you on a specific, but no it wasn't self explatory. It was a generalized statement that could mean anything. Your opinion on freedom for example...