OnShoringAmerica.com: Global Disincentives for Hiring Noncitizen Workers
Why Isn't the United States Leading the Charge Against Noncitizen Labor Exploitation?
While dozens of countries have implemented strong employer-paid measures — levies, quotas, surcharges, and compliance costs — to prioritize their own citizens and reduce over-reliance on noncitizen labor, the United States stands out for the opposite reason: the United States has no comprehensive federal policy that systematically disincentivizes noncitizen hiring or levels the playing field for qualified American citizen workers.
Look at the global picture:
Saudi Arabia, UAE, Singapore, Canada, Australia, South Africa, France, Malaysia, Bahrain, Indonesia, Nigeria, Switzerland, Egypt, Botswana, Ghana, Kuwait, India, Oman, United Kingdom, Qatar, New Zealand, and Japan all use tools like citizen hiring quotas (Nitaqat, Emiratization, Omanization, Kuwaitization, etc.), labor market tests (LMIA in Canada, Skilling Australians Fund levy, etc.), noncitizen worker levies, and financial penalties or incentives that explicitly favor citizens over noncitizens — including permanent residents in many cases.
These policies often include:
- Mandatory advertising of jobs to locals first
- Higher fees, levies, or taxes on employers hiring noncitizens
- Quotas with fines or loss of government contracts for non-compliance
- Training funds or subsidies specifically for hiring and upskilling citizens
The result? Reduced wage suppression, higher domestic citizen employment, and more balanced labor markets.
Yet the United States has none of these systematic disincentives.
This is the ONLY Structural proposal to turn this around:
drive.google.com/file/d/1ulo…