The tension for the right is that much of what modernity considers progress relies on universalization
Flows of capital, raw goods, information, everything must be transferable and consumable across the maximum number of participant with the highest degree of reliability
Nations, borders, religious identities, natural hierarchies, and even gender all create resistance to the universalization of these flows
Even the basic structure of the human identity stands in opposition, which is why the internet is currently molding Gen Alpha into a collection of interchangeable memes
Many assume that Karl Marx hated capitalism, but that isn't true, Marx needed capitalism to disassemble all those pesky social bonds holding people back from communist eutopia
Marx liked that capital was dissolving ancient regimes and monarchies, he saw it as a critical step towards global communism
That's why Marx remarked that he was an advocate of unlimited free trade, because he believed that it would erase national identity and boundaries
That's why Marxists supported feminism as well, not because the cared about women, but because they knew it melted down the structure of the family that eventually would lead to the weakening of national identity as well
The problem is that progress is a lie, you can reorder a society to maximize it for certain outcomes but you will always pay a cost
Things were ordered that way for millennia for a reason, you can tear that edifice down and rearrange the bricks to make something else while calling it progress, but that doesn't make it real
Don't get me wrong, I like antibiotics and indoor plumbing and I'm not yearning to give those up
But at some point we have to ask if we can make ourselves any less human in the name of chasing the god of progress
We don't have to blow up the modern world, but it might be wise to reconsider our current maximization, finding a balance that will allow us to retain meaning without returning to mud huts