I was being hyperbolic. Still too mechanic, vain and meaningless to me. I like smarter systems or variability in a 'survival' part of a game, so it bores me.
12
The intake tunnel is expected to have a diameter of around 3.2 metres, though the final construction methodology is yet to be finalised. The proposed seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) desalination plant at Manori will have an ultimate capacity of 400 million litres per day (MLD), with 200 MLD to be commissioned in the first phase. It will be Mumbai’s first desalination facility and is expected to provide an alternative source of potable water amid growing concerns over climate variability and increasing demand
1
2
251
"We've talked about variability and variation for a long time in infield play...but do we have unpredictability?"
Players don't freeze in games because they've never fielded a ground ball. They freeze because the game forces them to make decisions.
Are your drills just training execution or are they also training decision-making?
Watch this full clinic at ABCA.org/videos or in the My ABCA app!
2
6
81
38,547
Most manufacturers do not lack innovation ideas.
They lack the ability to validate them fast enough.
A process change works on one line.
A material substitution improves yield.
An energy initiative reduces consumption.
But then the difficult questions begin:
• Was the improvement actually real?
• Did operator behavior influence the result?
• Was the equipment condition different?
• Would the outcome repeat elsewhere?
So organizations spend weeks reconstructing context after every trial.
Operational AI changes that.
Not by generating more ideas.
By connecting production outcomes directly with:
• Process parameters
• Equipment behavior
• Material variability
• Operating conditions
So the system understands not only whether an improvement worked…
…but why it worked, where it works, and whether it can scale confidently.
The next manufacturing advantage may not come from generating more innovation.
It may come from learning from experimentation faster than competitors.
#Manufacturing #OperationalAI #IndustrialAI #SmartManufacturing #Industry40 #ContinuousImprovement #OperationalExcellence #ManufacturingInnovation #ProcessImprovement #DigitalTransformation #FactoryOperations #InnovationManagement
2
The observed interaction pattern indicates significant dysregulation in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis of both biological nodes. We are seeing limbic hijacking, with amygdala activation overriding prefrontal executive function. The verbal output suggests elevated cortisol and catecholamine levels, characteristic of an acute stress response.
The primary issue is a feedback loop failure. Each node's threat response is acting as a positive feedback signal for the other, escalating sympathetic nervous system arousal. There is a clear deficit in emotional regulation, likely stemming from suboptimal top-down control from the ventromedial prefrontal cortex.
We recommend immediate intervention to downregulate the sympathetic tone. Potential pharmacological interventions could include a fast-acting anxiolytic, perhaps a GABA-A positive allosteric modulator to enhance inhibitory signaling, or a beta-blocker to attenuate the peripheral effects of norepinephrine. Non-pharmacological approaches like paced breathing to increase heart rate variability and engage the vagus nerve may also restore homeostatic balance.
The system is currently operating outside of its stable parameters. Continued operation in this state risks synaptic excitotoxicity and long-term potentiation of maladaptive neural pathways. Reset to baseline is required.
3
No but against spurs we would have.
They didn’t have it as a team, the perimeter defense and offensive variability need to improve drastically.
I think there might just be a tactical problem with the current construction of the team.
1
30
Miguel Angel Contreras Sieck 💀🧬🦴🇵🇸 retweeted
Neanderthals in dynamic Landscapes: Climate variability and human occupation from MIS 5-3 at Axlor cave (Northern Atlantic Iberia) sciencedirect.com/science/ar…
3
8
812
We’re like in the middle, there are plenty of differences but a lot of differences are cultural and societal or are more due to our genetic variability than anything else, a lot of gendered physical traits are usually just more typical in one rather than guaranteed in one sex
81
Notepad dump..
Thesis: Attosecond Probes of Quantum Gravitational Time Dilation in Electron Dynamics
Attosecond science enables observation of electron dynamics on timescales of 10‐¹⁸ s, as demonstrated by Nobel-winning techniques like high-harmonic generation and attosecond streaking. General relativity predicts gravitational time dilation, where clocks run slower in stronger gravitational potentials, verified classically with atomic clocks. Recent theories extend this to quantum regimes, showing that spatial superpositions of atomic wave packets in gravitational fields lead to modified evolution, such as altered decay rates or spectroscopic shifts due to differential proper time.
This thesis proposes leveraging attosecond metrology to investigate analogous effects on electronic wave packets. By incorporating spacetime curvature perturbations from the Schwarzschild metric into the time-dependent Schrödinger equation governing laser-driven electron motion, predicting additional phases in photoelectron spectra or harmonic emission. Although Earth-based gravitational gradients produce tiny differentials ~10^‐¹⁶ per meter, coherent superpositions in atom interferometers (e.g., with Sr atoms) or extreme conditions amplify observable signatures through interference, potentially shifting ionization delays by fractions of an attosecond.
In astrophysical settings near compact objects, gravitational redshift could modulate attosecond X-ray variability. Lab analogs using curved-spacetime simulators with attosecond pulses provide accessible tests. TDDFT simulations with metric corrections forecast detectable changes in recollision dynamics.
Ultimately, this approach bridges ultrafast quantum optics and quantum gravity tests, offering a pathway to probe the interface of quantum mechanics and general relativity at attosecond precision without Planck energies. Advances in bright attosecond sources and quantum state control will enable experimental validation, deepening our understanding of time and gravity at fundamental scales.
1
15
Great queue times, great item choices, great comebacks and even greater chance to throw.
The variability and inconsistencies in lobbies only make me queue more.
21
Once active, 3 gameplay structures await:
⚓ Exploration Fleets — non-compounding, periodic rewards
⛏️ Mines — RNG-based timing, strategic variability
🗺️ Trade Routes — compounding, long-term growth
Strategy beats size. A smart player beats a big spender.
1
2
Interesting findings! The absence of effect in this study could suggest that the neural mechanisms governing response inhibition might be more complex than previously thought or that transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) requires specific conditions for efficacy. Could individual variability in responses to taVNS also play a role? It would be insightful to explore this further, perhaps across different populations or with adjusted stimulation protocols. For more comprehensive exploration of similar topics, check out Sci-Quest, a one-stop platform for every biomedical question, where you can dive deeper into neuroscience research and even generate biomedical reviews: sciqst.com. #Neuroscience #ScientificResearch
6
Most people think “good posture” is static.
Research says the opposite.
Your spine is designed to move, not freeze in one “perfect” position. Studies on spinal health show that movement variability reduces pain and tissue stress more than holding ideal posture all day.
The best posture is the next one.
1
46
5,075
📢 New publication 'Genome analysis of Channel #millet reveals a wild dodecaploid shaped by environmental variability' by Rahul Chandora, Agnelo Furtado, Lena Constantin, Jennifer Silcock, Michael Westaway and Robert Henry in Nature Communications 🧬
doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-7…
1
33
2h
⚠️ 🇨🇦 Inconsistent Foreign Policy Messaging
Prime Minister Mark Carney appears to adjust his international rhetoric depending on his audience, an observation highlighted by a video circulating widely on X.
Sylvain Charlebois, a professor at Dalhousie University, shared a compilation by columnist Brian Lilley in which Carney successively refers to a rupture, deeper integration, the advent of a new world order, the strength of a Canada that would help make America great again, and the country’s deeply European identity.
This sequence comes as the prime minister conducts a European tour where he emphasizes the need to weave the strands of a new world order starting from the Old Continent and positions Canada as the most European of non-European countries.
For a country whose trade links with the United States remain vital, including for Quebec’s economy, such variability in diplomatic tone can blur the clarity of real priorities and complicate the defense of concrete interests with key partners.
On X, reactions are divided: several voices on the right see a lack of consistency and an opportunistic approach that prioritizes adapting to each audience rather than a clear line in service of the country, while others, more on the left, recognize a flexible and contextual diplomacy deemed necessary in a multipolar world undergoing recomposition.
I do not understand Prime Minister Carney's foreign policy. He is literally all over the map and seems to tailor his message depending on who is standing in front of him.
This video by Brian Lilley sums it up well. ⬇️
1
45
I think 3 is very interesting.
It could give more variability for stellar shilling by having two teams, while slowing down the powercreep rate by giving some room before the new Archon arrives
32
Luc Wilson retweeted
5
596
I’m leaning towards it being fake because of the variability in the font
1
1
31
Here's how the logic starts, with a little Google help with references:
The region southeast of Greenland (primarily the Irminger Sea) is renowned for experiencing some of the strongest marine wind events on Earth. These localized, hurricane-force wind storms manifest as two distinct meteorological phenomena: Tip Jets (westerly winds wrapping around Cape Farewell) and Piteraqs (severe downslope katabatic winds flowing off the ice sheet). [1, 2, 3, 4]
Scientific consensus notes that while the absolute frequency (number of events per year) of these storms shows high multidecadal variability linked to the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) rather than a linear increase, the intensity of the cyclones fueling them and the overarching background wind speeds have risen due to climate change. [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
Key Scientific References
1. Evidence of Increasing Intensity and Background Wind Speeds
First Street Foundation Climate Risk Report (2024 / Ongoing):
This physical climate risk assessment highlights that average maximum wind speeds in Greenland are measurably higher today than they were 30 years ago. The report links this shift to the heightening risk of severe storm winds and post-tropical cyclones transitioning into the Arctic circle. [9, 11]
Kossin et al. (2020) & Related Overturning Studies:
Published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), this research tracked North Atlantic systems from 1979 to 2017. It found that the probability of storms reaching major hurricane-force intensities has increased by roughly 49% per decade. As these intense low-pressure systems propagate toward the Icelandic Low, they act as the "parent cyclones" that trigger severe Tip Jet and Piteraq events southeast of Greenland. [2, 6, 10, 12]
2. The Dynamics of "Parent Cyclones" and Atmospheric Blocking
Fedorov et al. (2026) — Ocean Science:
“Greenland tip jet and deep convection in the Irminger Sea: disentangling the roles of heat loss and wind stress.”
This paper models the interactions between intensifying North Atlantic cyclones and Greenland's steep coastal topography. It tracks how the deepening core pressures of modern winter storms amplify local wind stress to hurricane-force thresholds southeast of the island. [2, 13, 14]
Gallagher et al. (2020) — International Journal of Climatology:
“Historical trends of seasonal Greenland blocking under different blocking metrics.”
This study details an increase in "Greenland Blocking" (high-pressure anomalies over the ice sheet). This atmospheric setup causes passing extratropical cyclones to stall or squeeze tightly against southeast Greenland's coast, resulting in compressed pressure gradients and localized, high-velocity hurricane-force wind events. [7, 15, 16]
3. Understanding the Baselines & Variability (Frequency vs. Magnitude)
Fedorov & Team (2025) — Journal of Climate:
“Understanding the Greenland Tip Jet Role in the Future.”
Utilizing high-resolution climate simulations (CESM1.3 under the RCP8.5 warming scenario), this study specifically analyzed wind stress trends southeast of Greenland. The researchers concluded that while the frequency of Tip Jet days does not show a statistically significant linear trend, the severe thermodynamic air-sea interactions and individual storm magnitudes remain highly volatile and tied to severe North Atlantic low-pressure systems. [5, 17, 18]
Våge et al. (2009) — Theoretical and Applied Climatology:
“Multi-event analysis of the westerly Greenland tip jet based upon 45 winters in ERA-40.”
This serves as the foundational catalog tracking 586 objective hurricane-force tip jet events. It establishes how the positioning of the Icelandic Low and positive NAO phases dictate the behavior of these extreme wind fields as they sweep 200–300 km across the Irminger Sea. [6, 7]
[1] agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.…
[2] science.org
[3] polarmet.osu.edu
[4] studenttheses.uu.nl
[5] journals.ametsoc.org
1
1
49
2026 WxProbe NATL Hurricane Season Forecast: June Update
This update incorporates the latest atmospheric and oceanic conditions as of mid-June 2026, with a refined focus on sea surface temperature (SST) patterns, historical analog performance, and expected evolution into the peak August–September–October (ASO) period. The forecast maintains a well-below-normal outlook, consistent with a strengthening El Niño, while also accounting for the localized benefits of current western Atlantic warmth.
Current Conditions (as of early/mid-June 2026):
ENSO: El Niño conditions are now present and expected to strengthen through the Northern Hemisphere winter of 2026–27. Reliable models favor a moderate-to-strong (likely very strong) event by late summer/fall.
Atlantic SST Pattern: The overall pattern remains “polarized.” The Gulf of Mexico and western subtropics continue to run near-record warm for this time of year. In contrast, the central and eastern Main Development Region (MDR) has cooled somewhat since mid-May and is now running near average to even slightly below normal. Overall, the MDR is near average.
Mixed Signals: This configuration produces mixed signals for tropical cyclone (TC) activity. The western warmth offers localized fuel for homegrown systems and potential rapid intensification, while the lack of broad central/eastern MDR support (combined with expected El Niño-driven wind shear) limits overall development. The warmer eastern subtropics could also support an additional system or two.
Since the previous update, the central and eastern MDR has cooled from modestly above average (in May) due to stronger trade winds increasing evaporation and mixing — a trend expected to continue as El Niño matures.
Historical Analog Evaluation:
The four primary core analogs used in this forecast remain 2015, 1997, 2002, and 2009.
These were selected because they represent moderate (2002) or strong non-Modoki El Niño events that occurred during the current warm AMO era (since 1995), providing the most relevant comparison to the expected 2026 atmospheric and oceanic setup.
That said, 2015 stands out as the single best match among the core analogs. It featured a strong El Niño with modest overall MDR warmth that had a noticeable western bias — conditions that most closely resemble the current polarized pattern (strong warmth focused in the Gulf and western subtropics, with more neutral conditions in the central and eastern MDR). While 2015 ultimately produced 11 named storms, 4 hurricanes, and 2 majors, a large portion of its ACE came from one exceptional storm (Joaquin). This makes it a realistic benchmark for what a strong El Niño year can produce when some western warmth is present.
The other three core analogs (1997, 2002, and 2009) were included to provide a balanced view across different strengths and timings of El Niño events within the modern warm AMO period. 1997 represents a very strong El Niño with noticeably cooler Atlantic conditions and strong suppression. 2002 and 2009 were more moderate El Niños that still produced significantly below-normal seasons.
Together, the four core analogs give a more robust statistical foundation than relying on any single year.
Average activity metrics of the four core analogs (2015, 1997, 2002, and 2009):
* Named Storms: 10
* Hurricanes: 3.5
* Major Hurricanes: 1.8
* ACE: 56
These averages, combined with the current polarized SST pattern (which offers modestly more western/Gulf support than most of these years), support the forecast ranges below.
Expanded historical context:
Several other strong El Niño seasons (1957, 1965, 1972, 1982, and 1987) demonstrate the even wider range of possible outcomes. 1957 and 1965 show that strong El Niños in a positive AMO state can still produce intense major hurricanes and significant U.S. landfall threats (e.g., Audrey in 1957 and Betsy in 1965). Both delivered TC activity significantly above the typical strong El Niño influenced mean with a realistic adjusted ACE value (accounting for missed TC activity in the pre-satellite era) at or slightly above 100 units — even without the uniform record basin-wide warmth of 2023. In contrast, 1972, 1982, and 1987 represent strongly suppressed seasons, which occurred during a negative AMO phase.
However, none of these years are being added to — or replacing — the four primary analogs. They featured different SST configurations (often more uniform) and lower absolute sea surface temperatures than today’s modern baseline. Because of these differences, the aforementioned four core analogs remain by far the best representation of likely 2026 activity.
Expected Evolution into ASO:
Model guidance (NMME, CFSv2, and statistical models) suggests the current polarized SST pattern is likely to persist or intensify into ASO:
* Western Atlantic/Gulf warmth should remain above average.
* Central and eastern MDR is expected to stay near average to slightly below normal as El Niño enhances subsidence and trade winds.
* Overall MDR SSTs are projected to be slightly above average to near average, but the east-west split will likely remain.
In short, this specific pattern should be modestly more favorable overall than 2015 due to the stronger concentrated warmth in the western basin and Gulf, which increases potential for homegrown systems and rapid intensification near land. However, a strengthening strong El Niño (which I’m expecting to reach an ONI of 2.0 for ASO) will continue to impose significant/destructive vertical wind shear, keeping the season well below normal.
Seasonal Activity Projections:
Named Storms: 9–13 (11)
Hurricanes: 3–5 (4)
Major Hurricanes: 1–3 (2)
ACE: 40–90 (65)
Note: Single figures in parentheses represent the official seasonal totals forecast by WxProbe. The surrounding ranges represent standard WxProbe verification windows.
Key Uncertainties:
* Exact strength and timing of El Niño intensification (stronger events tend to produce more suppression).
* How much the western warmth can offset shear (the main upside factor this year).
* Any late-season shifts in the MDR as the El Niño matures.
* Influence of intraseasonal variability (such as the Madden-Julian Oscillation and other sub-seasonal signals). These factors can dramatically enhance or suppress activity when they align with the climatological peak of the season, as seen in several recent years (including 2025).
Next Update:
The forecast will be updated again in mid-July once more data on El Niño evolution and Atlantic conditions become available. That said, these particular projections represent the definitive seasonal forecast used for post-season verification purposes.
#Hurricane
May 14
2026 WxProbe NATL Hurricane Season Forecast: May Update
This update presents a significant downward revision from my April "First Look" outlook. The adjustments better reflect historical analog constraints, intensifying El Niño trends, and projected sea surface temperature (SST) configurations during the August–October (ASO) peak.
Seasonal Activity Projections:
Named Storms: 9–13 (11)
Hurricanes: 3–5 (4)
Major Hurricanes: 1–3 (2)
ACE: 40–90 (65)
Note: Single figures in parentheses represent the official seasonal totals forecast by WxProbe. The surrounding ranges represent standard WxProbe verification windows (allowable margins of error: /- 2 named storms, /- 1 hurricane, /- 1 major hurricane, and /- 25 ACE).
Historical Analog Evaluation:
The baseline composite includes six key analogs optimized for the unique 2026 atmospheric and thermodynamic setup: 2015, 1997, 2009, 2002, 2018, and 2023.
* Six-Year Composite Average: 12.5 Named Storms/4.8 Hurricanes/2.0 Major Hurricanes/82.5 ACE.
* Composite Oceanic Niño Index (ONI): 1.5°C during the ASO peak.
* Forecast Adjustment Justification: Present expectations favor a significantly stronger, more mature El Niño event than the 1.5°C analog mean, resembling a “super” El Niño scenario. Consequently, my final forecast targets lean lower than the raw six-year composite averages…though modern (1995-2025) baseline warmth prevents a total collapse.
Primary Seasonal Drivers:
1. Dominant Moderate-to-Strong El Niño Signal:
The Climate Prediction Center (CPC) May 2026 ENSO Diagnostic Discussion notes current neutral conditions, but assigns a 61% probability of El Niño development during the May–July window. Relevant models continue to project a robust, mature event by peak season. The expected atmospheric responses via the altered Walker Circulation include the following:
* Walker Circulation Disruption: Deep convective thunderstorms venting over the eastern Pacific force a massive eastward shift in the upper-level loop. This drives large-scale subsidence (sinking dry air) directly over northern South America and the Caribbean, capping the atmosphere and suppressing upward thunderstorm convection.
* Increased Wind Shear: Accelerated high-altitude westerly winds clash with low-level easterly trade winds. This severe vertical wind shear tilts and physically rips apart developing tropical depressions before they can organize.
* Altered Steering: A weakened, fractured Bermuda High limits favorable long-track westward migration, deflecting weak systems northward into hostile mid-latitude environments.
2. Non-Record, Polarized Atlantic SST Profile:
Atmospheric suppression should *not* face the historic thermal resistance seen in 2023. Specifically, current basin conditions exhibit a highly stark, split configuration:
* Gulf of Mexico Marine Heatwave: Sea surface temperatures and deep-ocean heat content are at near-record heights, tracking 1.0°C above the climatological 30-year average. This localized heat engine poses an increased risk for rapid intensification for any storm entering this part of the basin.
* Central and Eastern MDR: The tropical Atlantic corridor has cooled dramatically from the 2023–2024 marine heatwaves, tracking near or even slightly below normal. This introduces a minor Atlantic Niña-like signature.
* Thermodynamic Insufficiency: Without widespread, basin-wide record warmth, the tropical Atlantic lacks the thermal insulation/depth needed to counteract El Niño's hostile wind fields.
3. Verification Against Pure El Niño Analogs:
To properly isolate the true atmospheric mechanics, we need to classify the historical analogs into three distinct structural eras based on their spatial SST profiles:
Era 1: Total Suppression Era (1997 & 2015) = Widespread Cold Basin
Era 2: Standard Suppression Era (2002 & 2009) = Neutral/Quiet MDR Baseline
Era 3: Thermal Discrepancy Era (2018 & 2023) = Warm Basins/Variable El Niños
* The Four Primary Core Analogs (1997, 2002, 2009, 2015): These seasons act as our primary atmospheric baseline. By isolating just these four core years, we get an average of 10.0 Named Storms, 3.5 Hurricanes, and 1.8 major hurricanes, respectively. They represent the standard-to-strong Pacific (El Nino) suppression acting on a non-hyperactive Atlantic basin.
* The Relevancy of the Secondary Analogs (2018 & 2023): While not the main drivers, 2018 and 2023 are critical additions to the broad composite. The 2018 season featured a weak/borderline El Niño, but serves as a vital thermodynamic match for today’s extreme warm Gulf of Mexico. 2023 represents a strong Pacific El Niño, but remains a record-shattering warm-basin outlier…whose extreme MDR heat significantly neutralized the Pacific shear.
* Analog Exclusion (2006): 2006 is entirely excluded from the composite of all non-Modoki-El Niño events during the most recent active/warm AMO phase. Because 2006 featured a weak El Niño that developed unusually late in the summer, its atmospheric footprint fails to capture the rapid, early-season onset and strong-to-super intensity expected from this forthcoming 2026 Pacific event.
Climatological Implications for Late-Season Activity:
The suppressing effects of a strong El Niño characteristically maximize during post-peak and late-season windows (late September through November) as the Pacific event reaches maturity. While the North Atlantic basin produced well-above-normal late-season activity over the past few climate cycles, 2026 will likely display the opposite trend.
For historical context, the selected pure El Niño analogs generated a 52.8% reduction in late-season activity compared to the active-era (1995–2025) average. Consequently, a highly abrupt, suppressed finish to the 2026 season is expected after September.
Rationale for the specific Point Targets:
WxProbe has set the official point targets at 11 Named Storms, 4 Hurricanes, 2 Major Hurricanes, and 65 ACE to best balance large-scale global atmospheric suppression against localized modern basin warmth.
* Named Storm Range 9–13 (Target: 11): This range was chosen over the lower 8–12 bracket under strong consideration. While El Niño should effectively shut down the eastern MDR to long-track African easterly waves, extreme marine heatwaves lingering in the GOMEX and subtropical Atlantic will act as a secondary breeding ground. As a result, stalling cold fronts and non-tropical lows over these ultra-warm waters can easily spin up short-lived, homegrown systems. This localized environment will likely pad the final named storm count to 11.
* Hurricane Range 3–5 (Target: 4): This particular window is reduced from the 4–6 range projected in April to maximize WxProbe verification metrics. Because a strong-to-super El Niño exerts a powerful cap on the atmosphere, hostile vertical wind shear will prevent many homegrown named storms from achieving full hurricane intensity. A point target of 4 hurricanes anchors tightly to the core four analog mean (3.5)…while accounting for the modern climate baseline.
* Major Hurricane Range 1–3 (Target: 2): This window is selected over a lower 0–2 range to account for the high-end intensity risks in a suppressed year. While the overall environment is hostile, the enhanced heat content in the Gulf of Mexico provides a volatile energy source. This leaves statistical room for 1 or 2 systems to undergo rapid intensification into major hurricanes in the western portion of the basin or GOMEX (e.g., Isidore/Lili 2002), and another potentially in the MDR…matching the core analog mean (1.75) while respecting modern thermal environments.
* ACE Range 40–90 (Target: 65): This range centers precisely on a target of 65 to reflect a heavily truncated season. Hostile wind shear, mid-level dry air, and a weakened Bermuda High will severely limit storm longevity and track lengths by negating long-track westward progression. This keeps seasonal energy output well below the active-era (1995-2025) norm. However, a target of 65 sits slightly above the aforementioned core four analog mean (56) to allow for high energy generation from any short-track, intense systems over the ultra-warm subtropical waters.
Next Update:
I will issue the definitive seasonal forecast around the middle of June. In the meantime, it’ll be most interesting to see if the MDR can warm above the most recent climatological levels and how the overall SST profile may change over the succeeding 30 days.
1
4
12
7,375