BioTech - AI - Host of Latent Space AI for Science podcast

Joined April 2009
27 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
So much exciting news coming out of Axiom! So glad we got to sit down with you! @axiommathai @CarinaLHong
🆕Scaling Past Informal AI latent.space/p/axiom @axiommathai founder & CEO @CarinaLHong explains why math may be the missing path from code agents to AGI, why verified AI is about scaling brilliance not just fixing hallucinations, how Lean and formal proofs turn reasoning into a stronger reward signal, why Axiom sees the TAM as all AI-generated code, what it means to prove research conjectures in a self-verified way, and why the next bottleneck for AI may be not generation but verification.
3
170
RJ Honicky retweeted
A spicy podcast. In the movie The Man Who Knew Infinity, Ramanujan became a much stronger mathematician after the Hardy made him write proofs. Verification is for better generation, for optimal design. Verified AI accelerates superintelligence, esp agentic superintelligence.
This past March, @CarinaLHong sat down with @latentspacepod for an episode on the Series A announcement. "Verified AI sounds like eating broccoli and paying taxes, but to Axiom it's about scaling brilliance, compounding brilliance." Agentic superintelligence needs Verified AI.
6
9
93
11,564
36
RJ Honicky retweeted
Our paper on ESMC, ESMFold2, and mechanistic interpretability for proteins is up on @biorxivpreprint! We've made a few changes since the initial version went online last week. 1. We found an issue in the way we provided MSAs to OpenFold3. This led us to report lower performance of OpenFold3 on some benchmarks. This issue does not affect any of the other models evaluated. 2. We updated how we report results on Runs N' Poses to more closely match the original paper (counting only ligands with valid SuCOS similarity score). We also add a bar plot to the supplement that stratifies performance by similarity. This mostly changes the absolute values of the pass rate, not the relative performance of models. 3. Added some more BLI data to the supplement. 4. Added some missing citations, fixed typos, etc. Check out the preprint here: biorxiv.org/content/10.64898…

2
25
144
12,210
Thanks 1M to BioHub team for their awesome presentation of ESMC/ESMFold2/ESM Atlas paper at Latent Space Paper Club. @proteinrosh @THayes427 @awfderry @biohub YT link in the comments 👇
3
2
39
3,081
ESMC/ESMFold2 authors to present at Latent Space Paper Club tomorrow! Links in the comments. @alexrives @THayes427 @proteinrosh @biohub
2
5
32
2,539
I love it when a plan comes together! Congrats Ron, this is a huge milestone.
This weekend at ASCO, we shared first results using @NOETIK_ai TARIO-2 foundation models to predict patients likely to benefit using pre-treatment H&E alone (from actual clinical trial data with @Agenus_Bio!). Some highlights below!
1
7
1,559
"genes are code" is always vague I like: cell nucleus → storage device / storage controller ribosome → JIT-compiler and runtime features from a world model (use a SAE) → functions Proteins → processes signaling pathways → workflows Phenotypes → behaviors / outputs @biohub
1
6
15
1,946
The ESMC/ESMFold2 release also includes ESM Atlas, which makes me very happy :). @biohub team delivers the data!
🆕Biohub’s Protein World Model: ESMC-6B, ESMFold2, 6.8B proteins, 1.1B structures, antibody design, SAEs, & the bitter lesson for biology latent.space/p/esmfold2 @biohub Head of Science @alexrives explains why biology may scale like language modeling, how metagenomics unlocked the next ESM scaling curve, why protein LMs can learn structure/function from sequence alone, how sparse autoencoders reveal biology inside the model, why ESMFold2 can beat specialized systems on antibody-antigen prediction, and how Biohub’s $500M Virtual Biology Initiative aims to build predictive models of cells, disease, and eventually physiology.
2
92
Love this summary of the paper. The paper is definitely worth the read!
I'm so excited to show the world what we've been working on the for the past months!! I'm going to highlight some of the fun results from this paper that I find particularly exciting.
2
62
RJ Honicky retweeted
🔬Doing Vibe Physics The full story of how GPT‑5.x derived new results in theoretical physics and quantum gravity, live on our Science pod today! latent.space/p/lupsasca our conversation with @ALupsasca, an award winning theoretical physicist on his AGI-pilling journey applying GPT5 to physics problems (with a nudge from @markchen90)! Timestamps 0:00 Introduction to Al's impact on physics research 0:43 Guest introduction: Alex Luposka 2:49 Alex joining OpenAl and the shift in physics research 4:08 The release of GPT-5 and the shift in capabilities 10:05 Explaining Quantum Field Theory and amplitude calculations 14:20 Overview of gluons and the strong force 14:38 Discussing the first research paper on single-minus gluon tree amplitudes 20:56 How ChatGPT helped solve a year-long physics puzzle 23:02 Complexity of manual calculations in physics 26:12 The history and mechanics of Feynman diagrams 27:44 The Parke-Taylor formula and the quest for simplification 31:26 Using ChatGPT to find the simplification in the special phase space region 38:07 Proving the formula from scratch to ensure validity 41:00 Determining the scientific impact and future research 42:27 Introduction to the second paper on graviton amplitudes 45:41 | Defining particles, irreducible representations, and symmetry 47:46 How GPT Pro generalized the research to gravity 53:57 The epistemological shift: Is this a new way of doing physics? 59:27 The use of Al as a 'scout' for research directions 1:01:44 The role of 'taste' and collaboration with Al 1:10:23 Personal evolution from Al skeptic to resident scientist 1:12:46 Solving a black hole perturbation problem with GPT-5 1:16:34 Discussing whether Al can make original, conceptual leaps 1:20:09 Challenges of 'Al slop' and the future of academic publishing 1:23:13 The bottleneck of writing academic papers 1:30:19 Final takeaways and looking ahead to the next year
Feb 13
GPT-5.2 derived a new result in theoretical physics. We’re releasing the result in a preprint with researchers from @the_IAS, @VanderbiltU, @Cambridge_Uni, and @Harvard. It shows that a gluon interaction many physicists expected would not occur can arise under specific conditions. openai.com/index/new-result-…
3
4
13
21,182
Noetik’s AI value proposition: “cohort selection” “When I do my drug’s clinical trials, who should participate?” Obviously, if you get that wrong, then your drug won’t “work,” even if it actually works! Ron Alfa explained to us how they do this using cheap imaging 1/
2
3
12
7,105
RJ Honicky retweeted
🔬 Training Transformers to solve 95% failure rate of Cancer Trials the AI for Science pod is back with @RonAlfa, CEO of @NOETIK_ai, and Daniel Bear, VP Research at Noetik, explaining exactly how their team of top AI x Bio researchers and engineers (shoutout @owl_posting) will use AI to cure cancer, by focusing on key bottlenecks like patient selection, and training large cancer foundation models like TARIO-2, an autoregressive transformer trained on one of the largest sets of tumor spatial transcriptomics datasets in the world... which first required years of blind faith in collecting good data to even get going:
1
4
21
18,246
Heather Kulik from @KulikGroup makes an subtle point here about building models based on literature. Graphs and author interpretation can give different numbers. Heather's team built a model to predict the temperature at which a MOF breaks apart based on experiment reports, 1/n
3
52
Replying to @KulikGroup
@andrewwhite01/@EdisonSci- I know you just released a new literature agent. Does it read graphs? @wellingmax/@cusp_ai - I think your agents use literature too. What are you doing? 3/n
30
but found a big discrepancy between the plots in the reports and the interpretation. This is a good 60 seconds for anyone building scientific models based on literature. 2/n
19