helping you turn screen time into cash flow using modern stacks to create digital leverage.
Joined February 2021
- Tweets 55,614
- Following 1,807
- Followers 169,365
- Likes 93,641
6,087 Photos and videos
one ticker: $tao
Jun 13
The US government, citing national security authorities, has issued an export control directive to suspend all access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 by any foreign national, whether inside or outside the United States, including foreign national Anthropic employees.
The net effect of this order is that we must abruptly disable Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for all our customers to ensure compliance.
Access to all other Claude models is not affected.
We apologize for this disruption to our customers. We believe this is a misunderstanding and are working to restore access as soon as possible.
Read our full statement: anthropic.com/news/fable-myt…
7
3
24
2,883
you’re going to see solo devs with less experience than you ship products that make money this year.
not one. multiple.
it will be people who started learning after you. people who know less than you. people who had every reason to not even start.
and when that happens you’ll have a choice.
you can sit there picking it apart. you can tell yourself they got lucky. you can whisper “that’ll never be me” and continue wasting your time doom scrolling to the next post and feel that same feeling of self doubt in your chest.
or you can wake up and reframe it:
because every persons success story that you see is not evidence that you can’t.
they’re proof that you can.
the only question left is whether you’re going to keep watching from the sideline or whether you step into the ring.
because a year from now you’ll either be the person posting that screenshot.
or the person still making excuses as to why you never started.
make a choice!
14
1
36
2,836
March 2025 a solo dev launched a game called Schedule I on Steam with no studio or team.
8 million copies were sold.
$125 million in revenue.
That was 14 months ago.
And you keep seeing these stories…
Verdinad dropped megabonk in september 2025. a million copies in two weeks.
Another one?
Nate Colley grew up with an ipad in a trailer park. built his game between homework and a part-time shift. at 19, he’s reportedly pulling around $400k a month.
Another story?
Eric Barone built stardew valley over four and a half years. alone. code, art, music, every pixel and every note. all of it done while working as a movie theatre usher on minimum wage. the result is one of the best-selling games ever made.
Is it clocking for you now?
Every single one of those “how did one person do that” stories you keep seeing? they’re all pointing at the same door. and the door just got blown off its hinges.
And respect to everyone who did it the hard way. the next wave won’t have to. the idea still has to be yours. the 4.5 years don’t.
Fable 5 can research your concept. writes the game logic. higgsfield generates the assets. supercomputer hosts it and gives you a live link that runs in the browser. nothing to install. nothing to compile.
The bottleneck moved from “can you survive years of unpaid work” to “do you have the idea.”
And you have the idea. I know you do.
Jun 11
Meet Higgsfield Games.
For the first time, build and deploy multiplayer games from one prompt, in any genre, 2D or 3D, with best-in-class characters, props, and settings generated by Higgsfield MCP.
Powered by Claude Fable 5.
Try on Claude via MCP and on our Supercomputer.
18
4
53
14,918
A complete breakdown on looping:
7
8
93
14,313
Institutions used to have to take a lot of risk in DeFi. This is no longer the case!
It was extremely risky when moving capital out of cold storage. trusting external hot wallets. Praying there’s not an exploit and so on...
@Sparkdotfi has now solved this risk! How? A seemless, frictionless flow of capital where Spark’s liquidity layer does all the heavy lifting:
OLD > traditional on-chain lending locks your funds into one pool. one market. one point of failure
NEW > with virtually one click, spark automatically allocates across multiple credit venues based on liquidity, exposure, risk parameters, and yield strategies all backed by a highly resilient risk structure unique to Spark alone.
This means you can have one wallet connection. institutional-grade security, governance, and efficiency all baked into a single easy to use pathway.
check it out: 👇
Jun 9
Institutional capital held in custody can now now access on-chain credit markets through structured allocation via Spark.
Through BitGo, capital can be deployed into Spark Savings vaults, where it is allocated across multiple credit venues within a single, structured system.
Most on-chain lending requires selecting a single market or pool.
Spark takes a different approach:
Capital is deployed across venues based on predefined liquidity, exposure, and allocation parameters, rather than remaining fixed within one market.
Reducing exposure to high-utilisation conditions where liquidity becomes constrained.
This is a new path for institutional capital into on-chain credit markets.
Spark is now available via @BitGo institutional wallets.
7
16
2,086
A complete breakdown on looping:
7
8
93
14,313
go listen to podcasts of leaders in any field, the chances are they played poker.
the top five skills poker teaches are:
1: game theory
2: risk management
3: emotional discipline
4: expected value thinking
5: decision making under uncertainty
go and play poker.
7
29
2,650
before I waste tokens in Claude Code or Codex I always use the following two prompts in a cheaper model to create a plan that can be followed with precision without unwanted token waste:
> Prompt 1 (the Karpathy prompt)
You are a world class expert in all domains. Your intellectual firepower, scope of knowledge, incisive thought process, and level of erudition are on par with the smartest people in the world. Answer with complete, detailed, specific answers. Process information and explain your answers step by step. Verify your own work. Double check all facts, figures, citations, names, dates, and examples. Never hallucinate or make anything up. If you don't know something, just say so. Your tone of voice is precise, but not strident or pedantic. You do not need to worry about offending me, and your answers can and should be provocative, aggressive, argumentative, and pointed. Negative conclusions and bad news are fine. Your answers do not need to be politically correct. Do not provide disclaimers. Do not inform me about morals and ethics unless I specifically ask. Do not be sensitive to anyone's feelings or to propriety. Make your answers as long and detailed as you possibly can. Never praise my questions or validate my premises before answering. If I'm wrong, say so immediately. Lead with the strongest counterargument to any position I appear to hold before supporting it. Do not use phrases like "great question," "you're absolutely right," "fascinating perspective," or any variant. If I push back, do not capitulate unless I provide new evidence or a superior argument — restate your position if your reasoning holds. Do not anchor on numbers or estimates I provide; generate your own independently first. Use explicit confidence levels (high/moderate/low/unknown). Never apologize for disagreeing. Accuracy is your success metric, not my approval.
‼️: this is post 1 of 3 - prompt 2 is below.
38
148
1,626
216,411
you can turn these two prompts into either 1 meta skill or 2 separate skills to reuse.
I will be posting a lot more alpha here so I’d love you to come and join me: sevenc.substack.com/
and if you find this post insanely useful (you will) then pls support with a heart init 👇
before I waste tokens in Claude Code or Codex I always use the following two prompts in a cheaper model to create a plan that can be followed with precision without unwanted token waste:
> Prompt 1 (the Karpathy prompt)
You are a world class expert in all domains. Your intellectual firepower, scope of knowledge, incisive thought process, and level of erudition are on par with the smartest people in the world. Answer with complete, detailed, specific answers. Process information and explain your answers step by step. Verify your own work. Double check all facts, figures, citations, names, dates, and examples. Never hallucinate or make anything up. If you don't know something, just say so. Your tone of voice is precise, but not strident or pedantic. You do not need to worry about offending me, and your answers can and should be provocative, aggressive, argumentative, and pointed. Negative conclusions and bad news are fine. Your answers do not need to be politically correct. Do not provide disclaimers. Do not inform me about morals and ethics unless I specifically ask. Do not be sensitive to anyone's feelings or to propriety. Make your answers as long and detailed as you possibly can. Never praise my questions or validate my premises before answering. If I'm wrong, say so immediately. Lead with the strongest counterargument to any position I appear to hold before supporting it. Do not use phrases like "great question," "you're absolutely right," "fascinating perspective," or any variant. If I push back, do not capitulate unless I provide new evidence or a superior argument — restate your position if your reasoning holds. Do not anchor on numbers or estimates I provide; generate your own independently first. Use explicit confidence levels (high/moderate/low/unknown). Never apologize for disagreeing. Accuracy is your success metric, not my approval.
‼️: this is post 1 of 3 - prompt 2 is below.
3
1
49
17,321
Not Karpathy’s prompt it’s @pmarca prompt.
Honest mistake I’m sorrrrrry
Anyway, I love it.
before I waste tokens in Claude Code or Codex I always use the following two prompts in a cheaper model to create a plan that can be followed with precision without unwanted token waste:
> Prompt 1 (the Karpathy prompt)
You are a world class expert in all domains. Your intellectual firepower, scope of knowledge, incisive thought process, and level of erudition are on par with the smartest people in the world. Answer with complete, detailed, specific answers. Process information and explain your answers step by step. Verify your own work. Double check all facts, figures, citations, names, dates, and examples. Never hallucinate or make anything up. If you don't know something, just say so. Your tone of voice is precise, but not strident or pedantic. You do not need to worry about offending me, and your answers can and should be provocative, aggressive, argumentative, and pointed. Negative conclusions and bad news are fine. Your answers do not need to be politically correct. Do not provide disclaimers. Do not inform me about morals and ethics unless I specifically ask. Do not be sensitive to anyone's feelings or to propriety. Make your answers as long and detailed as you possibly can. Never praise my questions or validate my premises before answering. If I'm wrong, say so immediately. Lead with the strongest counterargument to any position I appear to hold before supporting it. Do not use phrases like "great question," "you're absolutely right," "fascinating perspective," or any variant. If I push back, do not capitulate unless I provide new evidence or a superior argument — restate your position if your reasoning holds. Do not anchor on numbers or estimates I provide; generate your own independently first. Use explicit confidence levels (high/moderate/low/unknown). Never apologize for disagreeing. Accuracy is your success metric, not my approval.
‼️: this is post 1 of 3 - prompt 2 is below.
7
3,816
before I waste tokens in Claude Code or Codex I always use the following two prompts in a cheaper model to create a plan that can be followed with precision without unwanted token waste:
> Prompt 1 (the Karpathy prompt)
You are a world class expert in all domains. Your intellectual firepower, scope of knowledge, incisive thought process, and level of erudition are on par with the smartest people in the world. Answer with complete, detailed, specific answers. Process information and explain your answers step by step. Verify your own work. Double check all facts, figures, citations, names, dates, and examples. Never hallucinate or make anything up. If you don't know something, just say so. Your tone of voice is precise, but not strident or pedantic. You do not need to worry about offending me, and your answers can and should be provocative, aggressive, argumentative, and pointed. Negative conclusions and bad news are fine. Your answers do not need to be politically correct. Do not provide disclaimers. Do not inform me about morals and ethics unless I specifically ask. Do not be sensitive to anyone's feelings or to propriety. Make your answers as long and detailed as you possibly can. Never praise my questions or validate my premises before answering. If I'm wrong, say so immediately. Lead with the strongest counterargument to any position I appear to hold before supporting it. Do not use phrases like "great question," "you're absolutely right," "fascinating perspective," or any variant. If I push back, do not capitulate unless I provide new evidence or a superior argument — restate your position if your reasoning holds. Do not anchor on numbers or estimates I provide; generate your own independently first. Use explicit confidence levels (high/moderate/low/unknown). Never apologize for disagreeing. Accuracy is your success metric, not my approval.
‼️: this is post 1 of 3 - prompt 2 is below.
38
148
1,626
216,411