Joined April 2011
168 Photos and videos
Great work by @luckyrobots team. Props to @devrimyasar !
We are super excited to share with you our initial release of Lucky Engine. We are building a robotics engine from the ground up to be what we wished we could find in a simulator before
1
3
357
Diego Prats | 🤖 retweeted
This is true. The bots right now are the worst they’ll ever be.
"Dominate Global Robotics" doesn't seem great Good read after @corememory @kyliebytes piece on Westmag, Atlas Motion Systems
1
7
33
4,036
A great robotics piece by @SemiAnalysis_ This is the best analysis I’ve seen on Unitree.
China's Unitree Will Dominate Global Robotics The Fastest Iteration Cycle In Next-Gen Robotics Should See Unprecedented Acceleration newsletter.semianalysis.com/…
148
Diego Prats | 🤖 retweeted
Everything here is 100% autonomous, 1x video playback speed. GO ULTRA mode boosts robot speed to 250%
22
16
230
20,458
Hot take: as an immigrant, I think visas will become an underrated driver of robotics adoption. If a company needs work done in a country with difficult visa requirements, it may be easier to send one specialist with three robots than to secure work visas for four people. Robots don’t need immigration lawyers, sponsorship, or months of paperwork.
2
4
367
Teleoperation would only make this easier tbh.
1
248
Diego Prats | 🤖 retweeted
It's still too hard to deploy a robot
I spent the last week in over a dozen pitches with robotics companies across Silicon Valley, NY and Europe...then I looked at the US Census Bureau Data Turns out 88% of US manufacturing plants don't own a single robot...and that's the opportunity Founders are seeing. Despite the endless deluge of humanoid robot demos and "AI factory" hype in our feeds, nearly 9 out of 10 American factories look exactly the same as they did 20 years ago. Manual labor, mechanical machinery, a retiring workforce and challenges in filling roles. The reasons why they haven't been "updated" historically breaks down into two clear buckets that I call: 1. The Integration Iceberg: A robot arm might cost $25,000 and has come down in price, but the custom tooling, safety cases and software integrations to make it work cost $125,000. 2. The Agility Tax: A traditional robot does one thing a million times. But the average US shop does "high-mix, low-volume" work. To reprogram a robot for a new part has required an expensive software engineer and could take days depending on engineer availability. The next generation of massive robotics outcomes won't come from building shinier hardware for the 12% of factories that are already automated. It will come from the Founders solving the integration and business model friction for the 88% that aren't. If your GTM strategy doesn't solve the 18-month ROI math of a shop owner in Ohio who needs financing, fast onboarding and the ability for the robot to handle a variety of tasks, then you're likely going to struggle. If you're working on a robotics business solving our countries biggest talent bottlenecks, I want to chat.
4
11
100
23,468
“There’s no version of the world, I think, where in 5 years there are not good, dexterous, capable hands for a few thousand dollars price, ready for integration into different robots and products. You should probably plan accordingly.” This is another reason why I am bullish on costs dropping and Cambrian explosion of robotics startups. Not surprising coming from @chris_j_paxton , but this is really a great primer and overview on the subject matter.
A new blog post on robot hands: - why they are hard to build and why there are no good ones - why we probably need them anyway - what the trade offs are - a random sampling of startups and research papers in the space
2
4
12
2,012
I really enjoy the videos by @welchlabs . I just caught this intro video into the recent history of robotics models and VLAs. I particular enjoy how across the videos @welchlabs tends to shows the lineage of models and how each advancement led to the next. youtu.be/2mrGMMmrVNE?si=Ch4h…
1
302
TLDR: The video focuses on advancements by @physical_int
89
Diego Prats | 🤖 retweeted
I've updated my zobotics website with a "Looking for opportunities" section. Still vibing in circles on the wording, but this is the gist. If you would like to chat or our previous chat didn't happen for whatever reason I've added a Cal link. Link in my profile.
2
2
39
3,459
Watching some tech incumbents get caught in the swamp of AI slop transitions while small teams 10-100x their output puts many incumbents in surprisingly vulnerable positions. “Agents will end up hurting large organizations more than high performing individuals or small orgs. … A trait you find in all high performing people is the ability to error correct, and they have mostly been good at seeing when slop is slop”
2
3
488
The placebo effect of “being on an elite team” is underrated. At an SF dinner with founders, the topic came up of how some NYC quant funds and SV neo labs “accept less than 1% of already top-tier applicants.” A PhD described how at their Anthropic was so hard it spoke about the intensity of Anthropic. Bet places could randomly pick 0.1% of applicants, tell them they’re elite, and get a large output increase as a team. Embrace the placebo. Maybe this helps me understand old school military esprit de corps. I am reminded how I watched high school seniors transform or become more ambitious once they get into elite colleges (but before they attend!). Saw same for college seniors who got elite job offers, doctors after matched but before they start, etc…
1
160
Diego Prats | 🤖 retweeted
Again robotics software sucks. Its so bad. Part of what makes it so bad -- and what makes stuft like ROS useful -- is the amount of boring middleware code you need to write between sensors, processes, etc. Coding models make it so much easier to work with, its wonderful.
May 21
Replying to @Ken_Goldberg
I asked Codex to set up ROS middleware, configure a CSI camera, benchmark Gemma 4 models on my Jetson Orin Nano, adapt an OpenClaw-style runtime for VLM reasoning (“Robotclaw” as I call it), and even build an iOS app to stream LiDAR, camera, GPS, and IMU data from an old iPhone to my robot rover. It’s honestly wild how capable these coding agents are now, and how much time they save. I even “write” way more tests now because the marginal cost is so low.
28
38
479
51,598
Diego Prats | 🤖 retweeted

1
5
16
3,698
Diego Prats | 🤖 retweeted
May 22
Hiring is broken because a LinkedIn resume only captures a fraction of a person's story. The exceptional builders that founders actually want to hire rarely keep their profiles up to date. Their value is in their proof of work: Github, X, blogs. Our founders are constantly asking us: "How do we find more profiles like this?" So we vibecoded Lookalike - a tool designed to discover talent by matching an entire digital persona.
8
1
36
4,558
Diego Prats | 🤖 retweeted
I learned so much about physical AI from a short call with one of my favorite cracked builders @0xChrisM and now I’m hooked. 🔥 Will follow along as the @HapticLabsAI team builds Festivus, which makes it easy for anyone to understand how to give AI a physical body!
May 13
At #FestivusAI, we’re building a catalog for robotics. Our first milestone was simple but important: gather scattered robotics data from #HuggingFace, #GitHub, vendor sites, tinkerer blogs, and all the odd little corners of the internet where useful knowledge tends to live. We credit sources clearly. No mystery meat data. Then we brought everything into one searchable platform, so people can actually find what they need without opening 47 tabs and questioning their life choices. Now we’ve added an AI agent that makes pages easier to edit, improve, and keep current. Think Wikipedia for #robotics, but faster to contribute to, easier to maintain, and built for the people actually doing the work. And yes, our code and data are #opensource too. Why? Because that’s how innovation leapfrogs. People build faster when the map is shared.
2
2
17
1,009