That thing we all knew was going to happen is happening.

This is undeniably two-tier isn't it ?

The government has now adopted two fundamentally contradictory positions: First, that 16 and 17-year olds are mature enough to vote. Second, that 16 and 17-year olds are not mature enough to manage their own social media use.

These social media bans have never been about protecting children.

Jeremy Clarkson says the government’s reported plan to impose a 9pm social media curfew on 16 and 17 yr olds makes no sense. “You don’t trust them to be on social media after 9pm, yet you’re happy for them to vote. How does that work? Am I taking crazy pills?” Clarkson asked.

Australia ban on social media for u16s: - exempts Bluesky UK ban on social media for u16s: - exempts Bluesky The establishment wants to control the rapid shift to the right while promoting a far-left platform as its replacement (fortunately, no one is interested).

“Prices are high because we’re not paying them enough” Okay she’s just messing with us at this point.

Intersex implies “between sexes.” Such a scenario does not exist—a misnomer. There are rare sex development disorders that impact males or females, however. And I’ve devoted the last 9 years to studying that research, writing two books, producing an animated series, and more.

he didn't 'balance the budget' He begged the state for money, and delayed payments to the city pension fund and retiree health benefit plan (By the way, balancing the budget in NYC is not an accomplishment. It's required by state law. Every mayor since the mid 70s has done it) He didn't lower anything. Rents have INCREASED an average of 6.6% in 2026. Lower the cost of groceries? How? And, sure, the Knicks won because of him..... Or did they win because the owner, a capitalist, spent a lot of money on good players?

To the left, the answer is always "give the government more money" and never "crack down on government spending and fraud and quit letting 20 million illegals Pour in and get on government welfare."

The government is $40T in despite collecting $7T in taxes every year. Yet they want you to think we're just one more tax increase away from Utopia.

You have spent more than 45 times his wealth in DEBT and haven't made a dent in any of those things while Musk is putting humanity back into space.

I believe it is still Labour Party policy to grant the vote to children it says cannot be trusted to scroll Instagram after 8pm. Last I checked, the NSPCC - the leading child protection charity in the UK - was against the government's approach here. The Molly Rose Foundation, set up explicitly to counter online harm to kids, was against the government's approach here. It is stricter and less workable even than Australia's model, which has not proven particularly workable itself. It was not in Labour's manifesto. It entails a gross invasion of privacy, not only for kids, but for adults who must prove they are not kids It imposes a vast and utterly unethical cost, to enact a policy that does not work, so a party of developmentally stunted mediocrities can appoint itself parent to your kids. I am not a violent person. I despise violence. I have never thrown a punch in anger. And I would not trust myself to be in the same room as the Prime Minister, because I would probably hit him in his fat, vacant, smug, incompetent, undercooked gammon steak of a face.

When your political ideology creates nothing of value, you lay claim to other peoples accomplishments.

The World Bank report on China's poverty alleviation also describes that it is due to liberalization, especially within agriculture. In more recent times, the improvements in China can also be traced back to more free markets: tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.…

1. This is "extreme poverty". $3 a day consumption PPP. 2. "Extreme poverty" is (and was) basically non-existent in the US, thus there was none to eliminate. 3. The World Bank poverty line for high middle income countries, like China, is $8.30 a day PPP. 15-21% of the Chinese population currently lives below this poverty line. 4. China also has more poverty and less PPP adjusted GDP per capita than nearby and less socialist / more capitalist countries like Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, and Japan.

The same person: x.com/i/status/1145470436563…

Socialism, I guess, is people paying tens and hundreds of thousands to see multimillionaires win a championship for the billionaire owner of their multibillion dollar franchise in a contest determined by merit.

Socialism is when a team is owned by a billionaire and built through free-agency signings and trades in a capitalist league of millionaire players. Nailed it as usual, kids.