MUST WATCH: What's The Problem? Demystifying why the world needs Bitcoin. By: Joe Bryan @satmojoe #fixthemoney #bitcoin @satsvsfiat Share with all your normie friends & family! youtu.be/YtFOxNbmD38?si=Nz37… via @YouTube

THIS ONE was worth reposting again.. A year ago this warning was issued. “Don’t vote for this guy. Mark Carney is the most elite of elitists out there. He’s not a man of the people at all. He’s the ultimate elitist.” Then the message got even more direct: The standard of living in Canada has imploded. Jobs are almost all public sector. Almost no real private sector growth or self-employment opportunities. OECD predicted Canada would have the worst performing economy of all 36 developed countries through 2030. And the closer: “The country needs a reboot. It’s time to turn your country around. It’s time to make Canada great again.” That was April 2025. Today we’re sitting in the exact mess he described — only deeper. Carney didn’t fix anything. He just changed the slogans while the same people who broke it stayed in charge. This wasn’t some random rant. It was a clear-eyed diagnosis of what happens when you hand the keys to a globalist banker who never had to live under the policies he pushes on everyone else. The country still needs that reboot. #cdnpoli #CarneyFail #CanadaFirst

Your the one making it more dangerous and divided

Bitcoin micro-class x.com/i/broadcasts/1kKzDDEPq…

MICHAEL SAYLOR: “IF QUANTUM COMPUTING HACKS YOUR EMAIL, DOES IT BREAK THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE?” LANGUAGE DOESN’T BREAK. YOU UPGRADE THE TOOLS AROUND IT, AND THE PROTOCOL STAYS. BITCOIN IS BUILT ON ENGINEERING PRINCIPLES, MATHEMATICAL SOUNDNESS, CONSISTENCY, INTEGRITY, AND TRUTH. JUST LIKE AN AIRPLANE RELIES ON STRICT PHYSICAL LAWS TO FLY, BITCOIN RELIES ON THE SAME KIND OF DISCIPLINED PRINCIPLES TO WORK.

🇺🇸 SENATOR LUMMIS MADE ONE OF THE MOST COMPELLING CASES WHILE SPEAKING ON THE BITCOIN & CRYPTO MARKUP. BULLISH

🇦🇪 ABU DHABI AIRPORTS WILL BEGIN ACCEPTING BITCOIN AND CRYPTO PAYMENTS. YOU ARE NOT BULLISH ENOUGH.

🇲🇽 BILLIONAIRE RICARDO SALINAS URGED EVERYONE TO MORTGAGE THEIR HOUSE AND BUY BITCOIN HE KNOWS WHAT'S COMING

THIS IS ABSOLUTELY WILD 🤯 Jack Dorsey's new AI tool, Goose, is 100% FREE. You type: "Build me a website like YouTube." And Goose gets to work on its own: → Creates the entire project → Writes all the code → Installs dependencies → Fixes errors automatically → Keeps going until it's working The crazy part? • No monthly subscription • Runs on your own device • Your code stays private • Completely open-source Just a few years ago, building software meant hiring developers or learning to code. Now you can start with nothing but an idea. We're entering a world where ideas are becoming more valuable than technical skills.

If you want to understand the modern left, you need to understand three men. One redefined freedom. One redefined history. One redefined power. Together, they created the intellectual foundations of much of modern progressive politics. Jean-Jacques Rousseau laid the foundation in the 18th century. He argued that man is born good and free but is corrupted by society – especially by private property. This idea that civilization itself is the source of inequality and oppression became the emotional core of leftist thought. Rousseau replaced the individual with the “general will” and portrayed traditional institutions as chains that must be broken. Karl Marx took Rousseau’s romantic critique and turned it into a supposedly scientific system. He argued that private property and class relations were not just morally wrong but historically doomed. Marx shifted the focus from abstract human nature to the economic base, claiming that history moved through class struggle toward a final, inevitable revolution. His ideas justified the seizure of power and the total reconstruction of society in the name of progress. By the 20th century, however, it was clear that the Western working class was not going to revolt. Antonio Gramsci provided the next crucial development. He argued that capitalism maintained power not primarily through economics, but through cultural hegemony – the dominance of “bourgeois ideas” in education, media, religion and civil society. Gramsci concluded that revolutionaries must first capture the institutions of culture before they could seize political and economic power. This strategic shift moved the left’s focus from factory workers to universities, schools, media and the family. Together, these three thinkers created the intellectual architecture of modern leftism: Rousseau supplied the moral grievance against civilization, Marx supplied the revolutionary method and historical justification, and Gramsci supplied the long-term cultural strategy. The result is a movement that no longer primarily fights over wages and factories, but over language, education, identity, and the moral legitimacy of Western society itself.

The number one lesson taught in public school is that truth comes from authority, and the problem with that is propaganda also comes from authority. Take away a person’s ability to discern, and they could be lead to any conclusion.

Bitcoin can be many things at once: • A censorship-resistant monetary network • A savings technology • A corporate treasury asset • A sovereign reserve asset • A global settlement network • A self-custody tool • A hedge against monetary debasement I don’t view these use cases as competing with one another. They reinforce each other. The activist escaping capital controls, the family preserving purchasing power, the business holding Bitcoin on its balance sheet, and the nation-state diversifying reserves are all participating in the same truth-based system. They may have different motivations, but they strengthen the same network. Transformative technologies spread through incentives, not ideology. Most people did not adopt the internet because they cared about free speech or understood TCP/IP. Most people did not adopt smartphones because they believed in distributed computing. Most people did not adopt GPS because they were fascinated by satellites. They adopted technologies that solved problems and improved their lives. The same is true of Bitcoin. Most corporations are not going to buy Bitcoin because they have read Hayek, Mises, or Rothbard. They are going to buy Bitcoin because they believe it is the best treasury asset available to them. Markets don’t require ideological alignment to produce systemic change. The internet didn’t transform the world because billions of people shared the same philosophy. It transformed the world because billions of people, pursuing their own interests, adopted a superior technology. Bitcoin is likely to spread the same way. Some people will adopt it for freedom. Some for savings. Some for treasury management. Some for speculation. Some because their company owns it. Some because their government owns it. The motivation is less important than the outcome. Every time capital moves from a fiat-denominated store of value into Bitcoin, the network becomes deeper, more liquid, more secure, and more resilient. A corporation buying Bitcoin for treasury purposes may not be explicitly trying to separate money and state. But when millions of individuals, companies, institutions, and eventually governments voluntarily choose Bitcoin over fiat assets, that is exactly what is happening. That is not a distraction from separating money and state. It is the mechanism by which it actually happens over the long-term. As capital moves from government-managed monetary systems into Bitcoin, control over money shifts from political institutions to an open network governed by transparent rules and voluntary participation.

The state didn't invent money. Carl Menger destroyed that myth in 1871 with his regression theorem, and statists have been seething ever since. Picture yourself in a primitive barter economy. You're a blacksmith who needs grain, but the farmer doesn't want your horseshoes. He wants pottery. The potter wants leather goods. The leather worker wants meat. You face what economists call the double coincidence of wants problem: finding someone who both has what you want and wants what you have. Barter works for simple trades, but complex economic coordination becomes impossible. Smart traders notice that certain goods get accepted more readily than others. Cattle, salt, shells, precious metals. These commodities share specific properties: durability, divisibility, portability, recognizability. Over generations, market participants gravitate toward the most marketable goods as media of exchange. No central authority decrees this. No committee meets to decide monetary policy. Individual actors pursuing their own interests spontaneously converge on the same solution. Money emerges from voluntary exchange, not government decree. Every unit of money traces its value back through an unbroken chain of exchanges to its original commodity value. Gold became money because people valued it first as jewelry, ornamentation, and industrial uses. Its monetary premium built on top of that foundation. When governments later monopolized monetary systems, they parasitically appropriated this organic market institution. You can observe this process today in Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Lebanon. When state currencies collapse, people don't wait for permission to adopt alternatives. They trade cigarettes, rice, Bitcoin. Markets route around monetary failure because human cooperation demands a medium of exchange.

🚨 This is the Mark Carney they don’t want you to see. No spin. No filters. Canada needs to watch this. 👇👇👇 Repost and Share #Canada  #cdnpoli

JUST IN: EL SALVADOR NOW OFFERS 0% TAXES ON #BITCOIN GAINS AND FOREIGN INCOME ONLY 90 DAY RESIDENCY IS REQUIRED GLOBAL GAME THEORY AT WORK 🚀

🇨🇦 Canada 📌 #1 in potash — globally 📌 #2 in uranium — 14,309 tonnes produced in 2024. Rising fast. 📌 #3 in palladium 📌 #4 in gold — 202 tonnes in 2024. Top producer in the Americas. 📌 Top 5 in nickel, cobalt, diamonds, niobium, platinum, titanium 📌 3rd largest oil reserves on earth — $622 billion in crude bitumen alone 📌 #1 in freshwater reserves globally 📌 #1 in forest coverage per capita 📌 Total natural resource wealth: $1.36 trillion. Officially measured. Likely far higher. Countries have started wars for a fraction of this. Canada is not a poor country. Canada is a rich country run by people who govern like it’s poor. In 2024 Canada exported $153 billion in minerals and metals alone — 21% of all merchandise exports. And yet: 📌 4.5 million Canadians below the poverty line 📌 $78.3 billion deficit this year 📌 $53 billion in annual interest payments 📌 712,000 children at food banks monthly 📌 $673,000 average home price 📌 Dead last in OECD GDP per capita growth projections This is not a resource problem. This is not a geography problem. This is not a population problem. This is a governance problem. It took a specific set of ideological choices — carbon taxes on producers, pipeline cancellations, regulatory paralysis, 10 consecutive deficit budgets — to bury a country this blessed. Norway found oil in 1969. Built a $1.7 trillion sovereign wealth fund. Canada found oil before Norway. Built a $78 billion deficit instead. Same resource. Different government. Different result. Imagine where Canada would be if we were actually allowed to win. 🇨🇦 Tag a Canadian who thinks we can’t afford to cut taxes. 👇 🔁 Repost if every Canadian deserves to know what we’re sitting on. 🇨🇦💀 #CdnPoli #Canada #NaturalResources #Carney

🚨 Nobody is talking about this. Canada isn’t just unproductive. It is actively disinvesting in the tools that create productivity. The data nobody leads with: 🔧 Business machinery & equipment: fell from $418.8B to $404.8B between 2014 and 2024. More workers. Less equipment. Per worker. 📉 Investment per worker in Q3 2025: ~$15,000. Down 23% from the 2014 peak of $19,400. 🏭 Private machinery investment in 2025: 15% below the 2008 peak. Remarkably — 2.9% below 2005 levels. Canada is going backwards. In nominal terms. Over 20 years.🚨 💸 The gap between Canadian investment abroad vs foreign investment here: ballooned from $100.5B in 2014 to $828.4B by 2025. Translation: Canadian money is fleeing Canada faster than foreign money is coming in. 🌍 Canadian firms invest significantly less per worker in productivity-enhancing capital than US firms. 🏦 The Bank of Canada’s own senior deputy governor called this a “national emergency” in 2024. Nobody listened🚨🤔 Here’s why this matters more than any other stat: Productivity = wages. Wages = standard of living. Investment = productivity. No investment → no productivity → no wage growth → no standard of living improvement. 🚨🇨🇦 If Canada seizes available growth opportunities, households could be $16,000 better off by 2035. We are currently doing the opposite. While Ottawa debated carbon taxes, launched DEI programs, and expanded the federal bureaucracy — 🇨🇦 Canadian businesses quietly stopped buying the machines that make workers worth more. Your wages didn’t stagnate because you didn’t work hard enough.🙇🏻 They stagnated because nobody invested in making your hour of work more valuable. That’s not bad luck. That’s a decade of policy that made Canada an unattractive place to build things. 🇨🇦 Repost if this explains your last 10 years better than any politician ever did. 🇨🇦💀 #CdnPoli #Productivity #CanadaEconomy #Carney #Investment

Oh fuck off already!! We don't want to be part of your fucked up New World Order bullshit!

Canada's Flag: A History of Deception Also available on YouTube, Rumble and Odysee, and at canadaillusionfilm.com

This is a recording of a recent presentation, in which I present conclusive evidence of the fraud and usurpation of sovereign power that was committed on the People of the land mass called "Canada" after the Statute of Westminster was enacted in 1931, including: 1. 1933: Imperial Privy Council member R. B. Bennett initiated a commission to create a private central bank. In that commission he appointed high-profile members from the City of London to make it happen. And in 1934, the Bank of Canada was established as a privately owned central bank. Bennett had no lawful authority to do this! 2. 1935: in the House of Commons Special Committee on the British North America Act, Proceedings and Evidence Report, high-profile members of the "government" testified and confirmed that "the Statute of Westminster has altered our status," and that "Canada is not a confederation." 3. August 10, 1935: a commission was drafted by R. B. Bennett to appoint Lord Tweedsmuir (John Buchan) as Governor General. A commission is not the same as a Letters Patent! A Governor General derives his powers from a Commission (the appointment to an office), a Letters Patent (the constitution of the office itself) and the Instructions. All three documents are required! 4. September 25, 1935: A Letters Patent amendment was allegedly issued by the Clerk of the Crown in Chancery (signed Schuster) adding a very questionable section to the last official Letters Patent from March 23, 1931. The section states that in the absence of the Governor General it is to be understood that he "continues to exercise all his powers, including the power to appoint a Deputy." Interestingly, the official record of this Letters Patent amendment is CLOSED FOR 100 YEARS in the UK Parliamentary Archives and cannot be seen by anyone. Why is that?!? 5. September 30, 1935: Imperial Privy Council member Lyman Poore Duff declared himself acting Governor General ("Deputy"). He justified this action with Letters Patent from 1905 (which were REVOKED in 1931) and with the fact that the Governor General from 1931 was absent (why was he absent?). Duff had no lawful authority to do this! 6. November 2, 1935: Lord Tweedsmuir proclaims that he is Governor General. He was sworn in by Lyman Poore Duff, who had no lawful authority to do so. Lord Tweedsmuir received NO Letters Patent and NO Instructions, which are REQUIRED to exercise the power of executive government! 7. February 10, 1938: Walter Kuhl (MP) stated in an address to the House of Commons that "all the evidence I have been able to gather compels me to entertain grave doubts as to whether or not any individual member of this assembly has authority, or whether as a group we have authority to legislate as a parliament." He further stated that "I trust I am doing an acceptable service in bringing some of these matters to the attention of the house, the legal authorities in which may be able to provide me with the necessary enlightenment." 8. April 8, 1938: Walter Kuhl (MP) stated in another address to the House of Commons that "no parliament of Canada can be created until there is an agreement signed among the provinces creating a parliament." And that "as no attempt to refute the statements made by myself in the debate on the address in reply to the speech from the throne on February 10 has been made, it is conceded that what I said is true." There is no documented evidence that Kuhl's statements on record have ever been refuted! There was no provision in the Statute of Westminster that a subordinate parliament of a colony could magically turn into the parliament of 13 sovereign states without the consent of the People of each state! When will @JasonLavigneAB @RedactedNews @RebelNewsOnline @PrometheanActn @PardyBruce @ikwilson @thevivafrei @TuckerCarlson @delbigtree @Shawnbuckleylaw @DavidKrayden @RealCandaceO @NadineWellwood @SNewmanPodcast @scoopercooper @DavidRe09886944 @X22Report or even @NewsTreason @RamboAndFrens and others acknowledge these facts and start talking about this?

🚨 Canada’s institutional capture is now complete. Since 2015 the Liberals have appointed: ⚖️ 740 of 1,000 federal judges 🏛️ 7 of 9 Supreme Court justices 📜 100 of 105 senators 📰 Fund 30% of every reporter’s salary in Canada And that’s just the foundation. Add to that: 📺 CBC: $1.4B annually to defend the Liberal narrative 🏦 Bank of Canada: Redefining recession in real time 📊 StatsCan: Counting Census workers as permanent jobs 📬 Senate: Hiding 240,000 democratic postcards in a warehouse 🌐 Bill C-8: MPs can delete you from the internet without a judge 🎙️ Carney on tape: Admitting central bankers bypassed voters on ESG They control the courts. They control the Senate. They control the Supreme Court. They control the media funding. They control the state broadcaster. Now they want to control the internet. Not one institution left standing independently. This is not democracy. This is managed decline with Canadian characteristics. And most Canadians are still waiting for CBC to tell them about it. 🇨🇦 Repost and Bookmark🔖 this post. 🇨🇦💀 #CdnPoli #Democracy #InstitutionalCapture #Carney #DefundCBC