Nearly every major Leftist victory of the last century follows the same exact playbook of turning some sort of boundary (national borders, the definition of marriage, the biological definition of sex, etc) that was considered universally accepted for the last 5,000 years of civilization into a moral problem.
From there, Leftists then would delegitimize any attempt to enforce the very thing that was taken for granted until five minutes ago by exhausting its defenders through endless moral outrage and ridiculous levels of hyperbolic accusation (“Deportations are a form of human trafficking!” “Having borders is Hitler!” “Trans genocide!”)
And what’s shocking about this is not how absurd it all seems when looking at it from the outside (it obviously was), but rather than it worked so well.
This model was almost flawless for decades. It gave the Left everything from feminism to gay marriage. And perhaps because it had such a stellar track record of racking up political wins, Leftists just naturally assumed they could deploy the progressive morality police as a sort of veto pen against any effort to undo their ideological agenda.
But what seems to be different this time is that the Right is finally willing to deny the Leftist premise entirely. They’re treating border enforcement and immigration law as things that are axiomatic rather than something that’s up for debate.
This is why the Left can’t turn ICE into a national justification for a 2020 style cultural revolution no matter how hard they’re currently trying. One side of the country just flat out refuses to grant them the moral legitimacy to burn the nation down.
And in doing so, we’re finally learning that the Leftist playbook only works so long as you grant them moral superiority. The second the Right responds with “you people are evil and your opinion is irrelevant”, the whole thing crumbles.