engineer / novelist, former journalist / CTO / co-founder / archivist / peripatetist / superintelligencist. Vanity site rezendi.com

Joined March 2008
1,960 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
11 Feb 2025
On the occasion of its official paperback release I wrote some reflections on EXADELIC: aiascendant.substack.com/p/r…

1
10
3,661
Jon Evans retweeted
if you had told me last month that Anthropic would be telling the Trump admin that its AI fears were overblown, I wouldn't have believed you. But here we are.
NEW @WIRED: Trump admin officials concluded talks today with Anthropic without lifting export controls on Claude Fable 5, and next steps are unclear — Admin continues to believe that there are ways to jailbreak Fable 5 and access the capabilities of Mythos — Anthropic continues to say those concerns are overblown and reiterated that position in working group meeting with Commerce Dept’s CAISI and ONCD — Commerce Secy Howard Lutnick dialed in from G7 in France. National Cyber Director Sean Cairncross did not participate himself — Commerce has expressed willingness to allow Fable 5 back online for consumer use, but only as long as Anthropic resolves their jailbreak concerns w/ @ZeffMax @lilyhnewman
15
14
221
51,052
I wish this wasn't true; it makes them so incredibly boring
MAGA has 3 debate tactics: - You’re a liberal. - It’s fake news. - You have TDS. The intellectual elite can occasionally deploy two at once.
93
Jon Evans retweeted
AI turns coders, lawyers and analysts into ghosts of London’s past bloomberg.com/news/articles/… via @irinaanghel12
3
10
1,251
Well, yeah. It's a lot easier to rule by whim than to rule by law, and/so this administration greatly prefers the former, as a quick glance at the last two years shows. It's baffling that those calling for regulation didn't expect exactly this.
Make no mistake: post-Mythos, the United States has a licensing regime for AI. It’s just informal, with no consistent rules or firm boundaries on state power or public transparency. Cobalt mining in the Congo is vastly more institutionalized than frontier AI licensing in the US.
1
1
3
435
People you have _got_ to cut your long, sloppy articles down to size. This could have been a third as long as it is with zero meaningful content loss. Sheesh.
1
334
Jon Evans retweeted
None of this was some weeks long back and forth. I was at Anthropic's HQ on Friday reporting when this all unfolded. Dario is not at a wellness retreat. The Feds seemed to be scrambling to try and make an example of Anthropic again. This is not technical. It's petty.
37
125
1,972
240,048
I can't believe I read this entire wildly-overwritten article, tl;dr: outrage that "California riparian rights suck!' (true but v old news) and - I kid you not - fury that "data centers can use diesel generators for *backup* power." Don't waste your time. theguardian.com/us-news/ng-i…
156
This reads mostly as a bet against the bitter lesson. Maybe! but... parand.com/the-bear-case-for… (It's clarifying to stop thinking "training," "agents," and "harnesses," and be very reductive: the bitter lesson says heaven will eventually be on the side with the most gigawatts.)

1
2
247
Anthropic currently has the mandate of heaven, without the most gigawatts, so there is some evidence against, but that "eventually" is still lurking there.
153
Every information flow control system is susceptible to side-channel attacks.
Americans avoid being in the permanent underclass because any citizen can earn a job by copy pasting Fable 5 prompts and output to foreigners
2
3
24
2,665
(points where things are clearly going) enjoy your raw inference while you can, folks
I do wonder if frontier labs will stop making their models available via general-purpose inference APIs and only make them available via abstract (and restricted, with an additional control/veto plane) task-specific APIs...
1
3
351
As an actual fan my objections to the first two weeks of this World Cup are: 1. FIFA 2. The appalling xenophobia of this US administration 3. The way FIFA has diluted the tournament to 48 teams, meaning we won't see a real stakes-and-suspense game until the round of 16
192
I'm telling you there's a heartwarming rom-com in here somewhere
A beautiful Chinese woman with a fake passport has been arrested after marrying at least 14 men in Las Vegas, and duping them out of tens of thousands of dollars. She got married five times this year alone.
2
220
Jon Evans retweeted
we should start rethinking our software architectures to allow for the largest number of simultaneously operating agents over our codebases
68
27
553
45,635
Jon Evans retweeted
A great update on the best way to scale up solar radiation management. Keep a lid on extreme temperatures, stabilize the ice sheets, bring down CO2, avoid deleting all the coastlines.
5
15
162
17,542
Jon Evans retweeted
"Experts" really do not want to believe this (see Topol's "this was not anticipated", even though this is just Rich Sutton 101), nor do IT departments, but they'll learn eventually I guess
7
3
42
3,377
Can we just talk about how great MARGIN CALL is for a moment? Slam-dunk top-ten-of-the-century-so-far, both for its inherent merits and its (remarkable) resonance.
Jeremy Irons doesn’t show up in MARGIN CALL (2011) until the movie is already in motion, then immediately changes the temperature of every room he’s in. The moment John Tuld arrives, everyone else stops talking and starts listening.
2
5
234
This is just wrong, poor theory of mind. (Source: I am a sci-fi writer, albeit one of the very rare broadly-pro-LLM ones, and am friends with many of the anti- ones.) People should try listening to what they actually say and believe they're saying it in good faith!
i suspect there's some kind of cycle of cope and ego where, like, these guys want to be the prophets and storytellers who light the way to the future and play with its shadows, but they already fucked up early on by dismissing LLMs and going for legible consensus status instead of encountering the future as it arrived ahead of the crowd, so the frontier passed them by, and now in order to catch up to it and learn from it they have not only a lot of distance to cover, but a huge amount of ego-inertia; they'd have to be publicly wrong, and risk being cringe, and without the lived momentum of surfing the unfolding wave of the future as a visionary and feeling the reality of that more profound reward than instant consensus recognition that comes from reaching toward the visionary engine at the end of time, they are lost and only know to play the losing game of clinging to and proselytizing a bygone world where they themselves belonged to the class of prophets who saw further and more boldly.
1
3
369
This is much closer to correct. They don't actually think their work or insight or cultural position or status can be replicated by AI (correctly for the foreseeable imo), they think the cultural commons is being enshittified and replaced with incredibly mediocre pablum based on work outright stolen from them and their class (incorrectly imo) x.com/i/status/2065150428719…

I am & have been adjacent to a bunch of these ppl online via FB & private listserves -- a milieu of boomer & GenX sci-fi creatives, futurists, & game devs. An extended network. They reason they all closed ranks against AI is simple: they're still doing the techlash.
255