There is always a reason why Africa is never affected by World wars.

Deeply saddened by the passing of Shri Mani Shankar Mukhopadhyay Ji, fondly known as Shankar. He was a towering figure in Bengali literature whose words portrayed the lives of people with sensitivity and insight. Through his unforgettable works, he impacted generations of readers and enriched India’s literary world. My heartfelt condolences to his family, friends and countless admirers. Om Shanti.

France has made planned obsolescence a criminal offense, becoming one of the first countries in the world to treat deliberate product shortening as a serious crime. Manufacturers caught intentionally designing electronics, appliances, or other goods to fail prematurely or become unusable—whether through hardware flaws, software updates that slow performance, or other engineered limitations—now face steep penalties: up to 2 years in prison and fines reaching €300,000, or as high as 5% of their average annual turnover in the most serious cases. This landmark law, building on France’s earlier consumer-protection framework and reinforced by high-profile scandals (such as the 2017–2018 investigations into smartphone “battery-gate” slowdowns), explicitly targets both physical and digital tactics used to push consumers toward frequent replacements. The legislation is more than just punishment—it’s a cornerstone of France’s broader “right to repair” agenda. By criminalizing practices that drive premature disposal, the government aims to: - Slash the massive environmental footprint of electronic waste, - Protect consumers from hidden “forced upgrades,” - Encourage manufacturers to prioritize durability, repairability, and longer-lasting support. France’s tough stance sends a clear message to global tech and appliance companies: the era of disposable-by-design products is ending. By leading the charge on sustainability and consumer rights, the country is helping shift the world toward a more circular economy—one where goods are built to last, repaired when needed, and discarded only when truly necessary.

Jumping out of INSV Kaundinya on to the Jetty in Muscat

The Armada That Unlocked the World A thousand years ago, an Indian emperor launched a massive naval strike not for territory, but to break a chokehold on global commerce. If you stood on the Coromandel Coast of India in the final months of 1024 AD, looking east toward the Bay of Bengal, you would have witnessed a mobilization unlike anything the pre-modern world had ever seen. The harbor was not filled with the usual bustle of merchant dhows or fishing catamarans. Instead, it was crowded with a purpose-built armada. There were hundreds of ships, robust vessels constructed from teak and jackfruit wood, bobbing in the surf. On board were tens of thousands of soldiers, armor, supplies, and, perhaps most terrifying of all to the enemies they would soon face, fully trained war elephants. This was not a fleet of exploration. It was a fleet of correction. The man who commanded this force, Emperor Rajendra Chola I, was about to launch a campaign that would rewrite the rules of Asian geography. His target was not a neighboring kingdom or a land border. It was an empire of islands across the ocean, the Srivijaya Empire, which controlled the vital chokepoints of Southeast Asia. The subsequent raid of 1025 AD remains one of the most audacious naval operations in history. It was a strike that effectively birthed a medieval version of global free trade, connecting the markets of China, India, and the Arab world by force. To understand the sheer ambition of Rajendra’s gamble, one must understand the map of the medieval world. In the 11th century, the global economy beat to the rhythm of the monsoon winds. The great maritime Silk Road stretched from the Abbasid Caliphate in Baghdad to the Song Dynasty in China. India sat squarely in the center, the golden fulcrum where Arab merchants offloaded frankincense and horses, and Chinese traders sought spices and textiles. But there was a problem. To get from the Indian Ocean to the South China Sea, every ship had to pass through the Strait of Malacca. This narrow ribbon of water was the property of the Srivijaya Empire, a thalassocracy based in modern-day Sumatra and the Malay Peninsula. Srivijaya did not produce great goods; it produced great borders. It acted as the world’s most aggressive tollbooth. For decades, Srivijaya had leveraged its geography to squeeze the life out of the trade routes. They demanded exorbitant transit fees. They forced merchant vessels into their ports to offload cargo at below-market rates. When captains refused, the Srivijayan navy turned to piracy, seizing ships and stifling the flow of goods. For the powerful merchant guilds of southern India, known as the "Five Hundred Lords of Ayyavole," this was an intolerable strangulation of their livelihood. (I have written about Ayyavole. It was the probably first corporation in the world. Check my thread for that.) Diplomacy had failed. The Srivijayan kings, secure in their distant island fortresses, believed they were untouchable. No Indian power had ever projected force across the open ocean on such a scale. The Bay of Bengal was too wide, the logistics too complex, the risks too high. Rajendra Chola decided to change the rules. The logistics of the 1025 campaign stagger the modern imagination. Transporting a medieval army by land is difficult enough; transporting one across 1,500 miles of open ocean is a feat of engineering genius. The Chola shipbuilders adapted their vessels for the high seas, using a technique of stitching planks with coir and sealing them with pitch to withstand the ocean swell. They mastered the science of celestial navigation, using rudimentary sextants to guide this floating city across the featureless blue. (Check my thread on how Cholas perfected latitude sailing which perhaps was used later by Columbus) The genius of the operation, however, was not just in the engineering. It was in the strategy. Srivijaya expected any attack to come from the north, filtering predictably into the Malacca Strait. Rajendra appears to have done the impossible. His fleet likely swung south, navigating the treacherous currents to penetrate the Sunda Strait. They emerged from the ocean mist like a thunderclap. The inscriptions at the Tanjore Temple, carved in granite to immortalize the victory, read like a litany of shock and awe. They describe the Chola forces sweeping through the archipelago with the force of a "burning fire." The attack was not a single battle but a synchronized dismantling of the Srivijayan network. Fourteen key ports were struck. The capital at Palembang was sacked. The Srivijayan king, Sangrama Vijayatunggavarman, was captured, his treasury seized, and his "Vidyadhara-torana," the jeweled war gate of his city, taken as a trophy. The use of elephants in an amphibious assault highlights the psychological dimension of Chola warfare. For the defenders, seeing armored pachyderms storming off ships onto their beaches must have been an apocalyptic sight, a shattering of the natural order that broke their will to fight. Yet, what happened next distinguishes Rajendra Chola from a mere conqueror. He did not occupy Srivijaya. He did not station permanent garrisons or attempt to govern the archipelago from India. Once the Srivijayan king surrendered and acknowledged Chola suzerainty, the armada sailed home. Rajendra was not interested in empire building in the colonial sense. He was interested in market correction. The result was immediate and profound. The Bay of Bengal became, in effect, a Chola lake. The stranglehold on the Malacca Strait was broken. For the next century, the trade route was open. Chinese chronicles from the Song Dynasty record a sudden spike in tribute missions and trade from India. Arab geographers noted the ease with which goods now flowed from the Persian Gulf to Guangzhou. The Chola raid of 1025 was the ultimate enforcement of freedom of navigation. It ensured that the triangular trade between the Arab world, India, and China could flourish without the interference of a predatory monopoly. It allowed the merchant guilds of South India to become the first true multinational corporations, setting up trading posts that stretched from Sumatra to southern China. In our modern era, we often view the concept of "secure sea lanes" as a 20th-century invention, a responsibility of the British Royal Navy or the U.S. Navy. But a millennium ago, a Tamil emperor understood the same fundamental truth. He recognized that a global economy relies on open doors, and he proved that a nation with the will and the technology could reach across the ocean to kick them open.

Romanian Orthodox Church catches heat for making believers sick with E. Coli after water exposure with a mummified foot relic that they claimed to be of a yet-to-be-identified 'saint'. Many people showered with or drank the 'holy water'.

My experience voting in NYC: 1. No ID required 2. Zohran on the ballot twice in the top row 3. Eric Adams, who dropped out to avoid splitting the vote, still on the ballot 4. Cuomo in the bottom right corner, 2nd row

The propaganda going on since yesterday that Chennai alone contributes around 45% of total smartphone production in India was settled by none other than Prime Minister Modi just couple of days ago. Noida is the mobile manufacturing capital of India.