Ty Shinn, CFA. Investing @HylaFunds. Co Founder @_perceptive. Prev. Portfolio Manager @GoldmanSachs

Joined January 2011
6 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
29 Oct 2024
Bad day to be a $USD.
6
355
Ty retweeted
As America cements its position as the crypto capital of the world, clear rules of the road for software developers are critical. Today’s staff no-action letter delivers long overdue clarity for non-custodial digital wallet software providers.
Mar 17
.@CFTC Staff Issues No-Action Position to Self-Custodial Crypto Asset Wallet Software Provider: cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressRele…
28
151
735
92,488
Jan 3
Nice idea but Muni CDS is basically non-existent. Super thin and usually bespoke contracts. Minnesota GO is AAA-rated. Muni CDS doesn’t function like Corporate IG/HY CDS.
I think this is the most asymmetric upside bet in the market now. Position yourself smartly and you can make 10-1000x with relative ease. How? Even if politicians try to bury the fraud, the bond market can’t ignore it. Their math will show that even if the fraud is only 10% of total state and municipal budgets, it’s already way too much and should go to paying back debt holders. Right now spreads don’t reflect this and are too tight - ie look at California Credit Default Swaps - it doesn’t reflect any fraud, budget shortfalls or the billionaire exodus. There is little chance these spreads don’t move as the bond market comes back to work and processes the events of the last few days. Now, if instead of 10% fraud, they believe that fraud is 20-30% of all tax dollars, the cost of borrowing will escalate sharply until federal, state and local governments are forced to act. This is when the CDS trade becomes the most asymmetric profit opportunity of our lifetime. Buy the CDS -> wait for politicians to try and bury it -> ie in California -> see the bond market increase borrowing costs -> see the CDS blow out -> asymmetric bet pays off. The takeaway here is that the bond market lives in an alternative and adjacent universe from the politicians and media. The latter group can try to bury an issue but when the former group is asked to fund it, a reckoning happens and the former group always wins.
1
2
120
Ty retweeted
Don’t get too involved in FX these days (because it’s boring) but seeing all the calls for lower USDJPY on account of the BoJ The driver for lower USDJPY most likely comes from the Fed rate cutting cycle driving broader dollar weakness plus the cheaper costs of hedging incentivising Japanese lifer and pension funds to increase hedge ratios THERE WILL BE NO JPY CARRY TRADE UNWIND The big Japanese investors won’t materially adjust portfolios, just adjust fx hedges However, be inclined to fade lower USDJPY on account of the BoJ hiking The BoJ are in an impossible situation and every hike which pressures the bond market raises the chances of the BoJ simultaneously needing to step up purchases of JGB’s to “smooth” bond volatility Furthermore, Japan have pi5sed China off with the naive comments from the new PM on defending Taiwan China will weaponise JGB’s as a result, selling them in the way they sold UST’s after Pelosi crossed a red line by going to Taiwan Either way, BoJ hikes are coming for the “wrong” reasons as they’re battling stagflation (largely as a result of spiralling rice prices) Certainly, this toxic mix is not going to encourage a large repatriation trade In fact, more likely to encourage flows the other way and greater exposure to US assets USDJPY then we think will continue to go higher and think we see USDJPY at 200 over the next year The BoJ will have to sacrifice the currency to save the bond market That will trigger flows INTO US assets, not out of them Rather than get involved in FX, still think you stay long Nasdaq and of course Bitcoin The big “carry unwind” the usual macro bears call for is not only not going to happen, but the domestic flows from Japan into foreign (particularly US) assets are likely to accelerate
10
13
103
39,710
25 Nov 2025
Great article deconstructing the Poverty Line and the real cost of participation in American Society, along with impacts to the American Deal and its effects on the electorate: yesigiveafig.com/p/part-1-my…
3
56
23 Nov 2025
Fantastic convo between @RyanSAdams & @crossbordercap on latest @Bankless pod
3
45
Ty retweeted
Is this time different? Let’s explore the 3 most recent analogs for when the Fed stimulated into similar macro conditions (1984, 1989, and 2007) In all 3 prior periods we had a setup of Fed reducing rates into: -stock markets around ATHs -gold around ATH -growth was positive -inflation higher than target In 1984 and 1989 after the Fed began stimulating we saw a melt up on the stock markets ( 52% and 25% respectively on the S&P after 24 months) while gold mostly moderated after a big run up preceding the Fed stimulus 2007 was the outlier with a stock market meltdown (-27% in the S&P 24 months later) while gold surged 43% Anyone who’s watched The Big Short knows why 2007 was different, and I acutely remember it as a consultant working on Goldman’s risk team in 07-08 The massive US housing bubble and associated intertwined leverage in the system made that time unique But this time we have arguments for an AI infra bubble that is showing signs of intertwined leverage 🤔 So the key question is - do we go the path of 84/89 and enjoy a melt up, or do we go the way of 07 and suffer a melt down? That all depends on whether we enter a credit crisis, so all eyes need to be on the early warning signs I don’t think the recent commotion in the repo markets is the canary in the coal mine, at least not yet, and broader credit markets still look pretty good So for the time being, I’m leaning more towards a melt up, and what we should be paying attention to are real interest rates If real rates compress as bank reserves expand, that should provide the fuel for the melt up scenario and I expect crypto to follow (BTC and some tagalong from majors and select alts, but not all your shitcoins - sorry no alt szn is coming) TLDR; too early to tell if we do a melt up or melt down so pay attention to credit market weakness and real rates for early signals but for now the melt up is the highest probable outcome imo
10
8
79
21,028
Ty retweeted
I say this as someone who was speaking nearly every day with Kevin at some point on LUNA falling, and works in distressed Zero. That is the chance you get an “unwind.” These vehicles can run to 0.1x mNAV and there is nothing shareholders can do anything about it. At a significant enough discount a competing business can offer to buy the treasury out. In fact the very LPs that contributed to the PIPE may do that. You could get a big sell off in the actual equities themselves. But that contagion doesn’t necessarily spread to the underlying assets bc there is no forced estate sale from a liability management POV. The more realistic scenario is that these vehicles just stop doing anything, and equity is held captive like a GBTC situation If you are hoping for a contagion style blow up in the underlying reserve asset - you will likely be waiting a while. SBET has been below 1.0x NAV for under a month now. You would think they would stop pressing the ATM then right to maintain equity value? WRONG. They continue to press
It’s getting late in the DAT cycle. Time for a healthy unwind then we resume up only.
62
44
566
180,795
ETH is starting to trade more like BTC: Citi data here show its beta to ETF flows is accelerating.
12
24
201
16,085
30 Apr 2025
Finally - and done the right way. The team behind WCM are some of the most talented, upstanding people I’ve ever encountered. Psyched for the success this project is about to have.
DeFi still can’t deliver on its most obvious trade: Leveraged Basis Trade. Start with $10, borrow $90. Sell $50 ETH Perps. Buy $50 ETH Spot. FREE MONEY, on Leverage. Only possible on WCM: spot, perps, and lending. All CLOBs. All cross-margined. Fully onchain. Fully audited. And fully deployed on MegaETH.
1
341
14 Mar 2025
Only solvent nations can truly be sovereign nations.
1
1
158
Ty retweeted
First glimpse of @AlphaPulseAI, powered by @Aicceleratedao. The goal is one-stop crypto intelligence & execution. Pulling data from crypto twitter, github, our proprietary crypto-optimized database with more integrations to come. Featuring @cryptopunk7213 @0xjeff @0xelonmoney @0xsammy.
83
27
211
34,858
Ty retweeted
The White House is pleased to announce its support for the CRA introduced by @SenTedCruz and @RepMikeCarey to rescind the so-called Broker DeFi Rule, an 11th hour attack on the crypto community by the Biden administration.
361
1,475
7,607
1,193,914
Ty retweeted
"Case dismissed." Two words that every defendant in every case yearns to hear. Today we can announce upon full Commission approval @SECGov is dropping our case. There will be no settlement or compromise-- a wrong will simply be made right. 1/4
321
820
6,232
1,260,071
17 Feb 2025
Nic Carter, the people’s champ 🥊
Amanda is out of her depth. Which makes sense, as she was SEC and not a bank regulator. Let's run through the crypto-focused banks to see if she has a point: - Silvergate: b2b. did not serve retail depositors. no "chargeback" risk from consumer fraud etc. - Signature: commercial banking, serving real estate, law firms, HFs, some crypto firms. no retail depositors - SVB: had a single crypto client, Circle. - Cross River: b2b fintech banking. no individual depositors - Customers: commercial and fintech banking. some retail depositors. - Lead: b2b fintech banking. Partner bank for BaaS. So prima facie her point about consumer fraud in crypto is a red herring. These banks were largely not dealing with consumer depositors. But they were the main ones targeted by the bank regulators and ground zero for debanking. The loss of access to banking was not a business decision by the banks, because the banks named above made the deliberate choice to serve crypto firms, and accepted the higher compliance and regulatory costs that came with that. Amanda is conflating operational derisking (the ordinary behavior of a bank to fire a client because for whatever reason, the client is not economical to serve – which they are within their rights to do), with regulatory-driven debanking, which is what happened here (with the FDIC/Fed imposing a 15% cap on crypto-related deposits FDIC pause letter activity). The FDIC pause letters reveal that the FDIC explicitly told 24 financial institutions to not build crypto products and to avoid crypto deposits. These are banks that wanted to serve crypto, and were prohibited from doing so. What her comments do tell me is to confirm that there was a culture among the financial regulators of believing that debanking crypto firms was morally right.
1
131
Drop below what real problems you want AI agents to solve for you @near_ai will incubate them all 👇
79
14
174
16,298
Ty retweeted
Congrats on the DAO! As the manager of the longest-running Liquid Venture crypto fund, @HylaFunds is throwing our hat into the ring for a partnership with @aicceleratedao. We bring strategic value across: A) Dealflow & Development – Our team comprises crypto x AI pioneers working to foster AI that benefits humanity, with Hyla’s @jfhaft co-founder of the Decentralized AI Society @DaisGlobal, Hyla GP @AniCHonan co-founder of the Imagine $1B AI & deep tech fund, Hyla CIO @ahoppin founding member @metropolis_dao and Director of the @ehfnewzealand Edmund Hillary Fellowship, Hyla’s @Matt_McKibbin co-founder of @DecentraNet, and Hyla CEO @paolaorigel CoinDesk contributing author. Together we will source AI builders globally and connect them with the resources and intelligence of the DAO. B) Distribution & Marketing - Our fund’s portfolio and allocation pipeline comprises more than 100 specialist investment teams managing multiple billions across AI, crypto and traditional finance, including @ContangoDigital, @I_D_Theory, and @ImagineGlobalIo, as well as @26cryptocapital itself). We will serve as a match-maker for DAO incubated projects to source values-aligned next-stage capital and resources from aligned investment teams. We are excited by the opportunity to contribute to the collective expertise and impact of @aicceleratedao !
3
6
12
2,388
Ty retweeted
7 Jan 2025
fill the form like, repost, follow @gigabrain_agent 🤖👀📈forms.gle/eQ5MgxgWi3hJ77kd8
586
2,618
2,881
74,804
Ty retweeted
15 Dec 2024
In my opinion, $NEAR's Chain Abstraction Chain Signatures Intents is a game changer. This is definitely going to unlock a whole new array of use-cases thereby driving growth and mainstream adoption even further. @NEARProtocol is lightyears ahead in terms of techstack. Not a single L1 comes even close.
13
41
291
18,292
Ty retweeted
Welcome to the new members of America's most pro-crypto Congress ever... 219 pro-crypto candidates and counting have now been elected to the House & Senate. Tonight the crypto voter has spoken decisively - across party lines and in key races across the country. Americans disproportionately care about crypto and want clear rules of the road for digital assets. We look forward to working with the new Congress to deliver it. Thank you to everyone who stood with crypto today. We did it! #StandWithCrypto
403
2,446
13,865
1,196,066