Augustine of Hippo is the father of a LOT of bad doctrines. Seeds that grew into thorny vines of teaching and cultural corruption through the history of the Church.
But there is a lot we now understand about Augustine’s errors and for some reason we still cling to what he said….why?
He did not know Hebrew, he did not understand the ancient Near Eastern cultural context of the Old Testament writers, and he heavily filtered Jewish scriptures through Greek philosophy.
Because he was working with translations of translations, he missed the poetic wordplay, cultural idioms, and specific legal concepts native to ancient Judaism. Instead, he treated the Latin words with strict, hyper-literal grammatical logic, which ironically forced him to invent complex allegories to make sense of them.
If he had studied Hebrew and Jewish tradition, his theology would have looked vastly different.
Key point: it would have been more accurate.
Instead it is a mess of misunderstandings and fabricated interpretation. Which became:
Original Sin
Total Depravity
A Static God
Double Predestination
We all know what we‘re looking at.
*cough* TULIP *cough*
Augustine wasn’t evil. His motives were good.
He didn’t know what he didn’t know, and he did the best he could with what he had in front of him for his time and place.
But today we know better. We have linguistics, and archeology and cultural studies, and physics.
So why, for heaven’s sake, do so many teachers in the Church still gobble him up and cling to his presuppositions?
Mistakes, however nobel their birth, should not be replicated when discovered. They should be set aside and re-thought out.
I think it’s clear now. It’s time to pull the weeds of Augustine from the Garden of doctrines and reexamine the crop of teachings and systems infected by his conclusions.
Because, isn’t the Truth of God worth it?
And frankly, I think Augustine of Hippo would agree.