LGBT supporting members like Jim Bennett want to recreate Mormonism into something it’s not—to justify their politics.
The Family Proclamation isn’t primarily a policy statement — it’s a cosmological claim.
To understand why two men cannot fulfill its vision, you have to start where it starts: “gender is an essential characteristic of individual premortal, mortal, and eternal identity and purpose.”
This isn’t gender as social role. It’s gender as ontological — a property of the spirit that predates the body and persists after death.
From this flows everything else. In LDS theology, exaltation is not a static beatific vision but eternal increase — the capacity to organize spirit children, to become as God is. D&C 132 frames this explicitly.
The “continuation of the seeds forever and ever” is the substance of celestial glory.
The sealing power exists precisely to bind a man and woman so that their generative capacity continues past death. Without that binding, you become a “ministering servant” — glorious, but terminal. The line ends.
Procreation isn’t a happy accident of marriage; it’s the telos. “The first commandment that God gave to Adam and Eve pertained to their potential for parenthood as husband and wife.” The commandment to multiply is given to the dyad — and the dyad is sexed because the multiplying requires it.
Eve is not interchangeable with another Adam. The cosmos itself is structured by the union of complementary opposites: male and female, heaven and earth, spirit and element.
Two men cannot image this union because they cannot be this union.
The metaphysics doesn’t bend to their political sentiment.