Imagine you never miss. ZeroMark turns a firearm into a handheld “Iron Dome” — against drones & other dangers. For military and law enforcement only.

Joined November 2023
12 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
16 Nov 2023
C-UAS in soldiers’ hands. AI-powered accuracy. It’s coming.
10
19
64
13,625
ZeroMark retweeted
Replying to @ycombinator
We couldn’t agree more. That’s why we built it…. Want to demo it in the field @bosmeny?
1
5
1,360
ZeroMark retweeted
I sat there in the front row, the hum of the room buzzing like the rotors of a drone swarm I've spent sleepless nights engineering against. March 3, 2026, @a16z American Dynamism Summit. @KTmBoyle on stage, sharp as a targeting laser, firing questions at Alex that cut straight to the bone of what we're building in defense tech. No theatrics, no mockery of war from VCs in tailored suits. Just raw patriotism wrapped in realism, the kind that saves lives on battlefields where hesitation means death. I'm the founder of @zeromarkinc, an a16z portco where we don't spin yarns or chase hype. We forge iron. AI fused with hardware and software, turning rifles into real life aimbots. Our systems let warfighters drop UAVs like flies and ensure they never lose a gunfight. Feet away from Karp, I heard every word unfiltered: advice for founders like me, navigating the storm of AI's rise. He laid it out plainly... refuse to play in defense, and nationalization isn't a threat, it's the horizon. No standing ovation erupted; the room absorbed it, heads nodding in quiet resolve, not applause. It echoed what @PeteHegseth has hammered home: "We will harness more of America's innovative companies to focus their talent and their technologies on our toughest national security problems." Then I scroll X later, and there's this post from @gothburz, weaving a satire so vivid it almost fools the feed. Powerful prose, uniquely carved, but a fabrication born from speculation, not sweat. He wasn't there. I was, close enough to see the lines on Karp's face, feel the weight of his warnings. What a waste of words when the real story is builders, grinding in labs and fields, turning tech into shields for those who stand the watch. I wish more would show up to these summits, trade tweets for truth, keyboards for action. We don't talk at ZeroMark. We do. And in doing, we arm the future against the fools who fire from afar, embodying @davidu's take that "our national security depends on all of them advancing as quickly as possible.”
I am the CEO of Palantir Technologies. The company is worth a quarter of a trillion dollars. I did not misspeak. Two hundred and forty-nine billion. The stock is up 320% in the past 12 months. The product is surveillance. I do not use that word at conferences. At conferences, I say "data integration," "operational intelligence," or "decision advantage." These mean the same thing. Surveillance is the honest version. I save the honest version for rooms where honesty is a competitive advantage. I gave a speech on March 3 at the Andreessen Horowitz American Dynamism Summit. "American Dynamism" is the fund's label for military technology. The name makes it sound like a fitness supplement. The fund's thesis is that defending the nation is a market opportunity. I agree with the thesis. The thesis made me a billionaire. Agreement is the product. I sell it at scale. Here is what I said, verbatim, to a room of six hundred people whose combined net worth exceeds the GDP of Portugal: "If Silicon Valley believes we are going to take away everyone's white-collar job and you're gonna screw the military — if you don't think that's gonna lead to nationalization of our technology, you're retarded." I used that word. The word is on the clip. The clip has eleven million views. My communications team asked me not to repeat it, which is how I know they are still employed. They will not be reprimanded. The clip is performing well. The stock went up. The word cost me nothing. The nothing is the point. Let me explain what I meant by nationalization. I meant it. I am telling the technology industry that if they refuse to cooperate with the United States military, the government will seize their technology. I am telling them this at a venture capital conference, on a stage designed to look like a living room. The living room had throw pillows. The throw pillows cost more than the median American's monthly rent. I sat on one. It was comfortable. Comfort is the setting in which I discuss compulsion. The audience laughed. I want to be precise about that. They laughed. I was not joking. Nationalization is the seizure of private assets by the state. I am a private asset. I am telling an audience of billionaires that the state should seize technology from companies that do not cooperate with the military, and the billionaires are laughing, because they believe I am only talking about the other companies. I am talking about the other companies. Three weeks before my speech, the Pentagon designated Anthropic a "supply chain risk." Anthropic is an AI company. They had red lines. The red lines said: if our AI is used for lethal autonomous weapons, we stop. If capability outpaces safety, we stop. The Pentagon assessed the red lines as a threat to the supply chain. The company that wanted to verify the safety feature worked was designated the risk. The company that agreed the safety feature could be decorative got the contract. The company that got the contract was OpenAI. OpenAI signed a deal with the same Pentagon. The terms are not public. The timing was hours after Anthropic was blacklisted. The speed was noted. The speed was the point. The lesson was the speed: the market for military AI does not pause for ethics. It pauses for nothing. It accelerates through objections. I know this because I built the runway. Two hundred thousand people joined a campaign called #QuitGPT. They signed a petition asking OpenAI to honor its original charter, the one that said the company existed to benefit humanity. The charter is on their website. The contract is also on their website. The charter and the Pentagon contract occupy the same domain. This is not a contradiction. This is a business model. The charter is the marketing. The contract is the product. I run a surveillance company. We have contracts with the Department of Defense worth more than a billion dollars. We have contracts with ICE. We have contracts with intelligence agencies whose names I am not permitted to say at venture capital conferences, even ones with throw pillows. Our software has been used to track undocumented immigrants. Our software has been used for things I am not permitted to describe in this format. The revenue from the things I cannot describe exceeds the revenue from the things I can. The ACLU called our ICE contracts a system for tracking and deporting families. They were correct. The contracts continued. The families continued to be tracked. The ACLU issued a statement. We issued a statement. The statements were different. The tracking was the same. The company is named Palantir. The palantíri are the seeing stones from Tolkien. In the novels, Sauron captured one and used it to corrupt everyone who looked into the others. I named a surveillance company after a surveillance device from a novel about the corruption of power. I have a doctorate in social theory. I have read the books. Here is the thing I want you to understand. I am not threatening anyone. A threat implies uncertainty. There is no uncertainty. The technology industry will cooperate with the military. The companies that cooperate first will be the richest. The companies that cooperate last will be acquired by the companies that cooperated first. The companies that refuse will be designated supply chain risks, and their technology will be obtained through procurement channels that do not require consent. I am describing a process. The process has already started. Anthropic is proof. OpenAI is proof. I am not a warning. I am a narrator. The narration is the product. The revenue was $3.12 billion last year. Up thirty-three percent. The analysts say we are overvalued. The analysts have said this for four consecutive years. Each year the stock doubles. Each year, the analysts adjust their models. The models were wrong four times. I was wrong zero times. The market rewards prediction. My prediction is that every AI company will work for the military within three years. The prediction is on the clip, next to the slur. The audience gave me a standing ovation. The ovation lasted nine seconds. I timed it. I time everything. The water was San Pellegrino. The throw pillows were from Restoration Hardware. The future of American technology was decided between the sparkling water, the nine seconds of applause, and a word I am not supposed to repeat. I am the CEO of Palantir Technologies. I am worth more than the combined annual budgets of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. I named my company after a corrupting surveillance device from a fantasy novel. I told six hundred billionaires that the government should nationalize their competitors. They applauded. I used a slur. Eleven million people watched. The stock is up. The philosopher does not threaten. The philosopher describes. What I described is already happening.
1
8
431
ZeroMark retweeted
9 drones, 9 kills, 30 seconds. Brought to you by ZeroMark Vanguard, our newest addition in the auto-target product line for our warfighters. We will win. 🇺🇸
1
7
876
20 Aug 2025
Thank you @SecArmy & @SenatorSlotkin for showing the surefire way to down drones @CampGrayling
One shot, one kill. @SecArmy paired with ZeroMark is a lethal combo. 🇺🇸🗽🔫
4
393
ZeroMark retweeted
Today is Memorial Day—a day reserved for honoring those who made the ultimate sacrifice in service to our country. It is not just a day off work or the unofficial start of summer; it’s a solemn reminder of the enormous price paid for the freedoms we enjoy. Since America's founding, more than 1.3 million service members have laid down their lives in war. Each of those lives was a universe of potential… fathers and mothers, sons and daughters, brothers and sisters... lost forever. The scale of their sacrifice is humbling: In the American Revolution, over 25,000 lost their lives, fighting to establish a nation rooted in liberty. The Civil War claimed roughly 620,000 Americans, more than any conflict in our history, as the nation struggled to define its very soul. World War I took over 116,000 lives, young soldiers crossing oceans to face battles far from home. World War II saw more than 405,000 Americans perish, sacrificing everything to confront unimaginable evils. Over 36,000 fell during the Korean War and more than 58,000 during Vietnam, each loss felt deeply by loved ones back home. In recent decades, over 7,000 more have given their lives in Iraq, Afghanistan, and in battles fought in quieter corners of the world, often without public recognition, but always with unwavering courage. Behind each of these numbers is a name, a face, dreams, and a family forever changed. Today, let us remember them not just collectively, but individually, acknowledging that their sacrifice was real, personal, and profound. Take a moment today to truly reflect on this. At 3 PM local time, as part of the National Moment of Remembrance, pause for just a moment of silence, honor their memory, and quietly reaffirm that their sacrifices will never be forgotten.
1
8
529
ZeroMark retweeted
Fun Day at SOF Week 🇺🇸🚀💪
11
10
174
21,906
24 Mar 2025
Looking forward to it!
24 Mar 2025
Excited to moderate a panel on 'Building a Hardware Company in NYC', as part of @Andercot's NY Deep Tech Week opening event. Featuring 3 NYC-based hardware founders: @jamie_niu of Podium Automation @joelcpanderson of @zeromarkinc @EddieCohen of @infinitemachine
1
609
ZeroMark retweeted
"Shooting down a drone is like being in a firefight, that's not a place you want to be. But when you're there, you need your tools to work." axios.com/2024/12/18/zeromar…
3
12
831
ZeroMark retweeted
Not all drones are equal. Electronic countermeasures alone won't protect us—basic mods can defeat million-dollar systems. Kinetic defense isn't comfortable to discuss on U.S. soil, but it's critical. Broke this down on @CNN's NewsNight with @abbydphillip. #newjerseydrones #cuas
27
15
50
24,512
15 Dec 2024
If this feels like science fiction, take a look at "Slaughterbots" for a chilling glimpse of how drones could cause mass chaos. It’s fictional, but disturbingly plausible—and exactly why we must act now, before reality mirrors the worst imaginations. youtube.com/watch?v=O-2tpwW0…

🚨 Mystery Drones Over NJ: A Domestic Security Gap We Can’t Ignore 🚨 I’ve been on @CNN , @NewsNation , @CBSNews , & @BBCNews discussing the thousands of unidentified drones over NJ. Rumors are swirling—foreign adversaries, secret U.S. ops, even aliens. The truth? Their origin matters less than our defenselessness to any drone with malicious intent. Drones are here, now—and without urgent action, we risk real harm. Dive in 🔽 (1/6)
1
3
989
ZeroMark retweeted
I guess I'm throwing in the towel. It's way cheaper to throw your rifle at drones than buying @zeromarkinc
Two dudes empty their mags in an attempt to take out an explosives laden FPV drone but fail. Then, one guy throws his AK74 at it (seriously) and that gets it to detonate likely saving his life. Wild... 👀 #war #drone #evolution #AK74 #ukraine #russia #FPVdrone
3
4
988
4 Jun 2024
Crushing it on special operations rules. Rule 1: Look cool Rule 2: Know what you’re doing Rule 3: If you don’t know what you’re doing, refer to Rule 1 Also, your long distance pistol performance was 🔥
Even I became a crack shot with @zeromarkinc tech🎯 Excited to back this stellar team and product🇺🇸 Read more… techcrunch.com/2024/05/31/a1…
1
7
1,167
2 Jun 2024

ALT The Matrix Neo GIF

Good news for TechCrunch! The Chinese Army is building technology to counter politically controversial American startups! If it works, China could permanently rid the world of political controversy forever!
5
1,114
ZeroMark retweeted
It is not controversial to give our men and women in uniform technology that actually works. It’s no longer 2017.
This week didn't have enough political controversy, so let me introduce you to a16z-backed ZeroMark, a startup that wants to give unmounted soldiers a 'gun that doesn't miss' drones: techcrunch.com/2024/05/31/a1…
17
20
332
70,594
ZeroMark retweeted
This technology saves lives. 🎖️
This week didn't have enough political controversy, so let me introduce you to a16z-backed ZeroMark, a startup that wants to give unmounted soldiers a 'gun that doesn't miss' drones: techcrunch.com/2024/05/31/a1…
1
8
58
21,526
ZeroMark retweeted
This week didn't have enough political controversy, so let me introduce you to a16z-backed ZeroMark, a startup that wants to give unmounted soldiers a 'gun that doesn't miss' drones: techcrunch.com/2024/05/31/a1…
39
12
145
189,040
29 May 2024
We’re thrilled to announce that ZeroMark has raised $7M in seed funding to bring our 'Handheld Iron Dome' tech to market and flip the script on small drone threats by making our defenders untouchable. Led by @KTmBoyle of @a16z and @jordanodinsky of @GroundUpVC, with participation from @AnorakVentures, @EmpireStateDev, @LudlowVentures, @balajis, and @soona. Details: businesswire.com/news/home/2…

5
19
69
79,496
ZeroMark retweeted
23 Feb 2024
We spoke with Joel Anderson of @zeromarkinc about creating a gun that never misses, why there's never been a better time to launch a defense tech startup, and the future of warfare in the age of cheap of robotics. hausb.io/blog/gun-that-never…
3
6
1,345