.
@RepDonBacon @DonJBacon is saying, “trust the Chairman, and if he fails, I can still sign discharge later.”
@RepBost
That sounds reasonable, but strategically it is weak for veterans.
Why it is not good:
1. “Later” is how momentum dies.
H.Res. 1247 is already public, active, and close. Waiting gives leadership time to cool pressure, split the coalition, and slow the final signatures.
2. A Chairman promise is not a House vote.
Bacon is asking veterans to trade a public signature for a private process. The discharge petition is countable. A promise is not.
3. If the Chairman really supports it, Bacon signing should help, not hurt.
A discharge signature does not stop committee action. It adds leverage. If leadership is serious, pressure helps them move faster.
4. The Senate excuse is a trap.
Bacon says the Senate may ignore discharge. Fine. But the Senate can also ignore a committee promise. The difference is the discharge petition forces the House to act publicly first.
5. Bacon’s role makes this worse.
He is not just any member. His own bio says he is a retired Air Force Brigadier General, has served on HASC since 2017, chaired the Military Quality of Life Panel, and was named chair of the HASC Cyber, Information Technologies, and Innovation Subcommittee. He knows exactly how leverage works in Congress.
6. No public commitment to bring this to a vote from the chairman
@RepDonBacon is mentioning as its not on the calendar to be voted on.
7. We know of the discussions to water the bill down from what the discharge petition is pushing.
Don Bacon says he can always sign later. Combat injured veterans have already waited years. Later is not leadership. Later is the delay. Sign H.Res. 1247 now.
54,000 combat injured veterans have waited long enough. Bacon signed a discharge petition for Ukraine. Now he wants wounded American veterans to trust a chairman promise and wait. Sign H.Res. 1247 now.