Judges 19 atrocities require Judges 20 justice. I speak to the men of the West, in your vocations as sons, brothers, husbands, fathers, citizens, and holders of any kind of public/civil office (at whatever level).

This is the FIFTH Jewish woman I have seen attacking the Rape Gang report. Incredible!

I'd still say God's judgment beginning with his own household looks like re-election of President Matt Harrison. We get the leaders we deserve. And yes, still not an endorsement of Joel Biermann. #PromotersofFakeLutheranism

250K White girls raped. 800K Pakistani males in the UK. Do the math. Every single one either did it or knew about it.

>it’s all Indians around the kid You can take them out of their hell hole, but they will bring it here. One of them is just looking at his phone while everything is happening.

This is where reality sets in. Magyar campaigned on a manifesto of Orbanist, socially conservative, Hungary First policies, but with better relations with the EU and less corruption. The problem is that the reason the EU and Orban were at loggerheads in the first place was exactly those socially conservative, Hungary First policies. You can either accept lots of so called asylum seekers from Sub Saharan Africa, the Levant and the Hindu Kush, OR you accept bad relations with the EU. You either accept European rulings about LGBTQ materials in schools, OR you accept bad relations with the EU. You either change the judiciary to stop pro-EU liberal progressives stopping by legal legerdemain the Hungary First Policies you were elected by the people to enact, OR you accept bad relations with the EU. You either put Hungarian taxpayers on the hook for billions of euros to give to Ukraine OR you accept bad relations with the EU. You either accept that you will have much higher energy costs by breaking relations with Russia OR you accept bad relations with the EU. While in theory there might be room for compromise on these issues, the EU will brook none—or certainly not from a middling EU country like Hungary. Germany or France perhaps, but not Hungary. The only 'compromise' they offer in such situations is help with the wording of any agreement: that is to say, they are unwilling to move even a quantum from their position, but they are willing to word the communique in a way that helps sell abject subjugation to a local population. It is highly unlikely that somebody of Mr Magyar's inexperience will be able to stand up for Hungary in this situation, even if he wanted to. While Princess Ursula Minor is incompetent, the permanent EU bureaucrats are not, and are well able to grind down even the most experienced opponents. They run rings greenhorns or dilettantes—especially ones who owe them many favours after electoral support. (Furthermore, each defeat for Hungary will be of a nature that makes the next line of defence marginally harder to defend than the previous. This is why Orban was so unpopular: he held the first line, and had over many years in power removed nearly all the tools used by the EU to hold the toes of disobedient nations to the fire.) So if Magyar putting a neoliberal globalist in charge of the economy and an LGBTQ advocate in charge of education, and being supported directly by the EU in the election, wasn't enough to make you question the viability of his 'Orban but with a return of EU funding and grants' — wait till these negotiations end.

Arguing over whether this is a “good” or “bad” definition of rape is a trap. So-called consent-based laws are always rolled out when reported rapes explode in the wake of mass immigration. Their real purpose is to let authorities claim there is "no real surge, just new norms and definitions", while creating a false equivalence between changing your mind after sex and brutal gang rapes. The same concept will also be used to let foreign pedophiles off easy by arguing their White victims “consented,” as we’ve already seen in the UK grooming gangs and elsewhere. Truly dark legislation.

She was involved with the inquiry, asked for tons of money, got mad, tried to scheme with victims behind the scenes to turn them against Rupert to try and implode the inquiry, and then got laughed out of the whole situation She’s a leech who is furious that she didn’t get a payout

“Why doesn’t the Confederacy just fade away? Is it because we are irresistibly fascinated by catastrophic loss? Or is it something else? Is it because the Confederacy is to this day the greatest conservative resistance to federal authority in American history?”
Prof David Blight

A Christianity that is comfortable with or even welcomes and celebrates the reward system of bourgeois society and its values is not really Christianity.

The pope and his clergy are on the side of the rape gangs. It is all satanic

We want to criminalize murder. Being female is not a free pass for murder.

If you don’t read it you’re gonna die, I’m gonna keep harping on it Read it

Sure you can pick any three random nons on the street and they will be down for a gang rape But what about their personhood?

Reminder for the guns don’t matter crowd, @rittenhouse2a shooting a couple pedophiles effectively ended the violent protests in Kenosha After Aug 25 they all transformed from violent riots into candlelight vigils

"doesn't seem like the most Christian response to me" Mfw the pope is just your basic indecisive feels-oriented church boomer

The first Pakistani lord was a convicted grooming gang member.

Some years ago this interview to a kid went viral in Spain. He said the pool was great because he likes peace & that pool isn’t filled with migrants screaming. Because of the comment, he went to 17 trials for racism. As a kid! It’s sickening.

Just doing a quick check-in to see whether the pope is still the antichrist, and... oh dear.

No, they are not correct. LCMS District Presidents perform neither the function of a bishop as defined in/by the New Testament (a pastor) nor the function of diocesan supervisors, as occurs with the "bishops" of the papacy. LCMS congregations do not "belong to" districts of the Synod; rather, districts are made up of autonomous congregations, as is the Synod itself in the pure sense (would that it were the only sense). Knowing these distrinctions is table stakes for this conversation. This is not weird. If you find this state of affairs embarrassing, that is an indictment of you and your ignorance. Read Elert, Eucharist and Church Fellowship in the First Four Centuries. It may help. No, there is no audiobook. Nor are LCMS District Presidents the civil-ecclesiastical servants of a Christian prince, as was the case in Post-Reformation Germany and, whether they'd admit it or not, in the Evangelical-Lutheran churches of Scandinavia. "But my heckin' Chemnitzerino and my vaporwave Bo Giertz memes and Lithuanians with croziers!" Just stop. Chemnitz and Gerhard and the rest of the Lutheran orthodox fathers would not know you. C. F. W. Walther exposits what the doctrine of Chemnitz and Gerhard et al looks like when applied in an interregnum, and there is no material difference between Kirche und Amt from what Luther taught or what the Confessions uphold. None. There has been no "development of doctrine" here, nor can there be. Doctrine is one. Whether explicitly confessed and boldly embraced or implicitly accepted, even if only latently and with a confused and anxious mind riddled by doubts, the exposition of the duplex locus of Church & Ministry exposited by Walther is the Christian position, full stop. And it is inseparable from the right confession of the Gospel in all its articles, q.v., the Book of Concord. No one who wholeheartedly and consciously disavows what is taught in Church & Ministry on the basis of the Scriptures will remain a Lutheran. He will either wear the Lutheran name like a skinsuit (see: the majority of the LCMS "clergy roster") or he will stop pretending and go be gay somewhere else. A false understanding of Church & Ministry undermines and unravels every other article, including, above all, the chief article: justification. I have said it before, and I will say it again: Walther's Church & Ministry was deliberately retconned in its recent new translation in order to obscure all of this as much as possible. Receipts in the replies. But I digress. LCMS congregations do not belong to the LCMS Corp. They exist by divine right, and if, say, the LCMS gets sued under RICO statues and dissolves (God grant it), they will still exist. (Plenty of them wouldn't even know it was gone.) LCMS District Presidents as such have no divine call. Zero. Or rather, they have just as much of a divine call to their work as you do to yours, whoever you are. You pick. A corporation does not issue divine calls. Pastors do not receive an indelible character at ordination which enables them to issue calls as a group. All such notions are false, fake, gay, and papistic (but I repeat myself). An LCMS Distict President is not the pastor of the congregations that make up the district to which he is assigned. He is a regional manager serving the interests of a domestic non-profit corporation in Kirkwood, MO, whose entire MO (pun, get it?) consists of mediating relationships between "Synod" and its voluntary "members" (congregational and clerical/professional). 100% corporate hireling, 0% episkopos. Along a different axis: 50% union rep and 50% psychotherapist (exact percentages vary by man). There is yet one mohr axis, but we won't talk about it here. Calling LCMS Corp District Presidents "bishops" would be the gayest of gay farces. In other words, it would be perfectly in line with the LCMS, and though it didn't fly this time, I'm sure they'll get around to it eventually - maybe by the time the second edition of LLCACA is released.