MET.PUREBLOOD! USMC Gulf War vet (0311) 3rd Herd, I 3/1. GWOT/OIF vet Vertical Construction engineer FED C followed by 111 Eng CO. God is an unreliable Jackass.

Joined June 2023
147 Photos and videos
David Opsahl retweeted
Voter fraud is real. We had receipts in 2020, we have receipts now. Don't let the media gaslight you. Again, you could put all this to bed by doing two things. Require Voter-ID. Require in-person voting. But the Democrats will never agree to this and we know exactly why.
WOW -- Trump crashes out and cuts his interview with Welker short as she presses him on his lack of evidence for claiming elections are rigged "You're either crooked or you're stupid. Let's call it quits. Because I've had enough. Thank you darling," he tells her." "I traveled all the way to Wisconsin for this interview," she pleads.
875
1,667
9,836
262,077
I am truly perplexed that so many people are against mosques being built... I think it should be the goal of every Western Society to be tolerant regardless of their religious beliefs. Thus mosques should be allowed, in an effort to promote tolerance. That is why I also propose that two nightclubs be opened next door to the mosque, thereby promoting tolerance from within the mosque. We could call one of the clubs, which would be gay, "The Turban Cowboy ", and the other a topless bar called "You Mecca Me Hot." Next door should be a butcher shop that specializes in pork, and adjacent to that an open-pit barbecue pork restaurant, called "Iraq o' Ribs." Across the street there could be a lingerie store called "Victoria Keeps Nothing Secret ", with sexy mannequins in the window modeling the goods. Next door to the lingerie shop there would be room for an adult sex toy shop, "Koranal Knowledge ", its name in flashing neon lights, and on the other side an off-licence called "Morehammered." All of this would encourage Muslims to demonstrate the tolerance they demand of us, so their mosque issue would not be a problem for others.
4,400
9,445
44,744
1,125,247
David Opsahl retweeted
It's rare for imagery this iconic to emerge organically. It's just a still taken from the body cam of Henry's murder and yet it is so poetic in its composition. The pale white flesh of Henry's hand, visibly depleted of blood as he is moments away from death, is both contrasted against his dark clothing and illuminated by the rays of the flashlight such that the image takes on the characteristics of a renaissance painting. Henry's hand is curled into something like fist. It naturally draws comparisons to Black Lives Matter and the "Black Power" Fist iconography, Henry's dying paleness evoking "White Power," the boogeyman we have destroyed our societies attempting to stymie. But there is no "White Power." Henry is dying. The fist is literally shackled, constrained, and drained of life. It is being "attacked" by the begloved hands, artificial, latex, inhuman, contorted into the shape of a predatory claw. These are literally the arms of the state. The "Systemic Organism." Our ultimate tyrant. These are not the hands of the individual officers to whom they actually belong, but rather the hands of a system, a meta-organism. Hands following orders that did not come from the minds of the human individuals but rather the Systemic Egregore. Hands operating under explicit instructions to elevate testimony that claims "racism" and to treat all Whites with suspicion as avatars of that "ultimate evil" against which the system has oriented itself. Except Henry was not evil. He was a victim of this inhuman system. This grotesquely maligned system embodied and visible in the grotesque blue claw clasping him and holding him down as he dies. The system that shackles the dying White "Power." Henry is Britain. He is the West. We are all dying. We are all bleeding to death shackled by the inhuman systems we live under. And if we continue to be shackled by these systems, we will, like Henry, die. The total repudiation of these governments are necessary to make any change. Incremental improvements are entirely insufficient. The time to be ungovernable is now. Regime change is necessary. Remigration is necessary. The mass rejection of the status quo and its systems is necessary. Revolution is necessary.
273
2,748
12,273
250,767
David Opsahl retweeted
Ça fait un moment que je me pose des questions sur le bilan (provisoire) de Milei en Argentine. On lit tout et son contraire. Alors j'ai arrêté de lire les commentaires et j'ai regardé les chiffres bruts. L'Argentine, c'est l'expérience grandeur nature que les économistes attendaient depuis 50 ans. Même pays. Même peuple. Même culture. On change UNE variable : la méthode économique. Avant : des décennies de gestion étatiste et péroniste, "redistributive". Le résultat concret ? 211% d'inflation, 42% de pauvreté, un État en déficit permanent qui finance son train de vie en faisant tourner la planche à billets. Puis arrive Milei. Méthode inverse, brutale, assumée : on coupe, on déréglemente, on arrête d'imprimer. Deux ans plus tard (photo à son arrivée (fin 2023) vs aujourd'hui) : Inflation annuelle : 211% → 31% Inflation mensuelle : 25% → ~2% Déficit public : −5% du PIB → 1,8% (excédent) Croissance : −1,6% → 4,4% Pauvreté : 42% → 28% Sans débat. Jugez par vous-mêmes. Et le point essentiel : ces gains ne vont pas "aux riches" ou "aux marchés". Ils vont d'abord aux plus pauvres. L'inflation est l'impôt le plus injuste qui existe — elle frappe ceux qui n'ont aucun actif pour se protéger. La diviser par 7, c'est rendre du pouvoir d'achat à ceux d'en bas. Et 14 points de pauvreté en moins, ce sont des millions de gens, pas une ligne Excel. Pendant un siècle, on a expliqué aux Argentins que l'État les protégerait en dépensant toujours plus. Résultat : un des pays les plus riches du monde en 1910, ruiné. On vient d'inverser la méthode. Regardez le résultat. À un moment, il faut accepter ce que les faits racontent : sur le terrain économique, la méthode libérale a livré en deux ans ce que des décennies de socialisme avaient promis sans jamais tenir. Et ça profite d'abord aux plus modestes. On peut détester le style de Milei — la tronçonneuse, l'outrance, les sorties improbables, il n'a rien d'un homme d'État classique. Mais on ne juge pas une politique économique au style de celui qui la mène. On la juge à ce qu'elle fait à la vie des gens. Et les chiffres ont parlé.
429
6,187
18,673
447,806
David Opsahl retweeted
10
37
428
17,882
David Opsahl retweeted
Yes, as the American skinsuit for the eternal Progressive omnicause, Democrats are evil. Reminder: 1) Just three years ago, a majority of Democrats supported quarantine camps and house arrest for the unvaccinated. A quarter of them wanted to take children away from unvaccinated parents, and over 40% of them wanted to fine and imprison anyone who criticized the vaccine. 2) Remember those pardons that Trump issued in his first week in office? One of them was for a 75-year-old Pro-Life woman who was sentenced to 2 years in jail for praying near an abortion clinic. When her family pleaded for mercy because they feared she would die alone in jail, the Leftist judge mockingly told her: “Maybe you should make an effort to remain alive, because that is a tenet of your religion.” 3) In 2020, UNC Wilmington professor Mike Adams made a joke comparing the COVID lockdowns to slavery. The woke mob on campus destroyed his life, blocked his promotion to full professor, got him fired, stalked him everywhere he went, and harassed him with threatening phone calls and text messages until he committed suicide. I haven't even begun to talk about: >What happened to astrophysicist Matt Taylor for his "offensive shirt" in 2014 >Google engineer James Damore and his memo on corporate Wokeism in 2017 >Nathan Phillips and the Covington Catholic students in 2019 >The BLM riots in American cities in 2020 >The Leftist bloodlust against Kyle Rittenhouse and Daniel Penny >The response from mainstream Democrats after one of their ideological co-belligerents murdered Charlie Kirk >The blatantly pro-criminal policies Democrat politicians pursue whenever they’re in power which result in violent psychopaths murdering innocent people in public Democrats are not merely evil. They’re comically evil. Their entire ideology is evil. And their politicians and core voting base are evil too.
There’s no rational conversation that can be had about religion with politically active Evangelicals because their core belief is that the most evil thing a person can be is a Democrat.
56
731
3,368
65,149
David Opsahl retweeted
The Mayor of Charlotte is demanding people stop posting this reminder of the lovely innocent Iryna Zarutska butchered by a savage on Charlotte public transit. He was on probation by a liberal activist judge.
3,382
74,971
185,303
1,943,873
Replying to @CrazyVibes_1
Gen X baby
8
38
178
5,634
David Opsahl retweeted
Dismantling the world's reliable power structure of coal, oil, and gas - without a planet-wide substitute - could be the greatest and costliest error of judgment in history. Despite decades of installing wind turbines and solar panels - at enormous cost - intermittent renewables remain unable to replicate the dense, reliable energy of hydrocarbons without fossil-fuel backup. Replacing the world grid for intermittent power carries a nominal price tag of $178 trillion 'so far'; McKinsey Global (2022) estimates the total transition by 2050 at $275 trillion. No one appears to have thought through the colossal pitfalls that lie a decade or two ahead. This building spree already suggests waves of environmental degradation, as picturesque landscapes, coastal vistas, and farmland are hijacked for wind and solar 'farms'. The resulting shockwave could send modern nations into an irreversible economic slide as early as 2030, while blocking all modernisation efforts across the Global South. It is a stark reversal of history. These universally successful energy sources are credited with the emergence of all modernity - the spark that exploded in the Industrial Revolution. Humankind first used coal in China around 3490 BC and later by the Aztecs. The Greeks and Romans used it for metal forging, and Marco Polo famously documented the use of 'black stones' for fuel in 13th-century China. Crucially, coal was the primary driver of the Industrial Revolution in the 18th century, providing the intense heat needed to generate steam and power factories, trains, and ships during the icy depths of the Little Ice Age - a desperate era of cold and starvation. Today, there are still vast known and untapped reserves of coal, oil and gas. Proven reserves alone are staggering: Coal: 1.06 trillion tonnes (approx. 132 years remaining). Gas: 7,299 trillion cubic feet (approx. 143 years remaining). Oil: 1.65 trillion barrels (approx. 53 years remaining). Yet the actual volume could be two or three times as much, lasting another three centuries. This abundance challenges the very nomenclature of 'fossil fuels', pointing instead to a profoundly abiotic, self-sustaining origin. Look to the cosmos: hydrocarbons are a fundamental building block of the universe, detected on rocky planets, icy moons, gas giants, and primitive comets. Saturn’s moon Titan is the reigning champion, with a thick nitrogen-methane atmosphere that rains liquid methane and ethane into massive surface seas like Ligeia Mare. Titan holds hundreds of times more liquid hydrocarbons than all the known oil and natural gas reserves on Earth. Closer to home, NASA’s Curiosity Rover has detected ancient organic molecules, including long-chain hydrocarbons like propane and benzene, preserved in Martian mudstones inside Gale Crater. Meanwhile, the atmospheres of Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune are rich in methane, which breaks down under intense pressure to form complex chains like ethane and acetylene. Even primitive bodies - like Comet Halley and the asteroid Ryugu - are heavily laden with complex carbon-bearing molecules. If the raw chemistry of hydrocarbons occurs abundantly across the frozen depths of the solar system, we must question the sacrifices demanded for net-zero. Could humankind survive such a bureaucratic blind alley?
85
498
1,027
17,676
David Opsahl retweeted
White people became aware that they are the real minority and argued for their protected status on that basis. (Assuming they'd be entitled for the same protections afforded the browns.) The genociders instead pivoted to affirming the browns’ hegemony based on their “global majority” status. So now you see it’s only ever been about one thing: they hate White people and they want you to die. You cannot appeal to their arguments or their empathy for your right to exist. Those aren’t for you. You will only earn the right to your own life and nation at the tip of a sword.
New poster child just dropped: Tiana Oberoi, chosen for Glyndebourne and Pegasus Opera Company's mentoring program because she's an "emerging artist of global majority heritage." Notice the language shift: They don't want "diversity" anymore, they want whites gone entirely so their institution mirrors the global brown majority. White people are old hat anyway, might as well deprive them of every possible opportunity until they cease to exist. Are you ready to admit this has always been the goal?
84
814
5,143
159,557
David Opsahl retweeted
W.E.B. Du Bois was absolutely brilliant… but this quote, the one you chose to use, also unintentionally exposes a painful modern truth. At what point do we stop blaming “the system” for everything while refusing to confront the internal collapse destroying many Black communities from within? Because today “the system” overwhelmingly includes: Black mayors Black police chiefs Black judges Black city councils Black school superintendents Black prosecutors Black congressional representatives Yet many neighborhoods continue spiraling under decades of identical Democrat political leadership. So eventually the harder question must be asked: If the system was “never built to protect us”… why do so many continue voting for the exact same political structures that presided over: failing schools fatherlessness crime dependency narcotics epidemics and collapsing economic mobility? A system can absolutely become corrupt. A bureaucracy can absolutely become self serving. But a culture can also decay from within when accountability disappears and grievance becomes more powerful than discipline, ownership, faith, family, and personal responsibility. That is the conversation many gatekeepers refuse to have. Because it is easier to perpetually externalize blame than to confront internal dysfunction honestly. The Black family survived Jim Crow with higher marriage rates than today. Survived segregation with stronger two parent households than today. Survived legal discrimination with lower violent crime rates than many modern urban corridors today. That should force serious reflection. At some point truth requires asking: What changed culturally? What incentives changed politically? Who benefited from dependency? Who profits from permanent grievance? That is not hatred. That is critical thought. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove
16
41
82
1,576
David Opsahl retweeted
“You cannot simultaneously have a welfare state and free immigration.” — Milton Friedman
1,089
8,839
33,123
30,511,204
David Opsahl retweeted
Let's examine what REALLY happened. When Donald Trump was a private citizen, a government contractor stole his private tax data and leaked it to the media. Because the government failed to protect his private records, Trump and his family sued the IRS for $10 billion. On May 18, 2026, the Justice Department settled the case. Trump agreed to walk away with zero dollars for himself. In exchange, the government put $1.776 billion into an "Anti-Weaponization Fund" to help ordinary citizens who say they were also unfairly targeted by federal agencies. The government also agreed to completely drop its ongoing tax audits against Trump's businesses. Trump declined $10 billion he was statutorily entitled to under 26 U.S.C. § 7431 and converted it into a compensation pool for other citizens, so calling this a corrupt enrichment scheme is factually backwards. If anyone else got that award they would have taken it and ran. Joe Biden and every other Democrat out there. The fund’s text explicitly says “there are no partisan requirements to file a claim,” meaning Democrats, independents, and Republicans are equally eligible. The audit waiver is bound to pre-May-18-2026 conduct, not “perpetuity immunity forever” as the ridiculous media and out of job former attorney Liz Oyer claims. Biden pardoned Hunter for crimes he was actually convicted of and Jim Biden while Jim was under two active federal investigations, with an 11-year window and zero public-facing remedy and the same commentators called that defensible. Literally. So the Biden family could issue pardon for crimes committed and active investigations but Trump, who was actually agreed and is statutory entitled to this money set up a fund to help Americans who were victims of political persecution, and the demented media is calling it some kind of corrupt act? Of course that same demented media wants judicial oversight. Would that be the judicial oversight that consistently rules incorrectly in any case involving Trump and gets overruled sometimes 9-0 at the Supreme Court? Not one prior U.S. president has faced this volume of criminal prosecution, civil litigation, and unauthorized disclosure of confidential financial records simultaneously, so pretending this is a normal political cycle is dishonest bs. The Obama administration used the exact same Judgment Fund mechanism in Keepseagle $760M, no congressional appropriation and the press called that justice. But it was actually much worse because in the Obama case this settlement was made against the advice of career DOJ officials who thought they could win at court. Trump personally receives zero dollars, zero damages, and zero direct financial benefit from the settlement the only thing he gets is the audit waiver as protect protection so he won’t be targeted by the same Weaponized government should they ever get power again. Congress will never legislatively compensate Jan 6 defendants, FACE Act defendants, or dismissed-case targets, so the choice was this fund or no remedy at all for documented victims of politically motivated federal action. The media is very dishonest in this country and there’s a lot of experts who are even more dishonest. I am not an expert at anything except research and common sense. It is just basic common sense that when you have a president issue blanket, pardons for crimes that nobody even knows about that may or may not have been committed on his way out, and the media doesn’t bat an eye, but then you have a president who is actually wronged and who uses his settlement money to help those who are also politically persecuted smeared as corrupt the problem is the media. -Insurrection Barbie
619
6,644
14,296
248,000
David Opsahl retweeted
Democrats NEED to call Republicans “Nazis,” and the inverse is not true because it’s unnecessary. I’ll explain. Republicans freed the slaves. Republicans won the Civil War and magnanimously reconciled with the losing Democrats even though they did not need to. Republicans passed the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments. Republicans gave women the vote. Republicans desegregated the federal workforce. Republicans ended Jim Crow. Republicans passed the Civil Rights Acts. Republicans have been zealous defenders of 1st and 2nd Amendment rights. Against such a stellar historical track record of promoting freedom and personal liberty, Democrats NEED to call Republicans “Nazis” to obscure the truth of who the bad guys actually are. Democrats, OTOH, built a party based almost exclusively on slavery and racism. Democrats initiated and fought a bloody Civil War that killed ~700,000 Americans. Democrats instituted Jim Crow. Democrats popularized lynching. Democrats opposed the post-Civil War Amendments and all of the Civil Rights Acts. Democrats denied the vote to women. Democrats re-segregated the federal work force. Democrats invented and staffed the KKK. Democrats have always fought for a racialized society. Democrats re-racialized society in the 21st Century. Democrats invented abortion as a tool of eugenics. Democrats killed ~66,000,000 babies since 1973 thanks to Roe v. Wade. Democrats hate the 2nd Amendment. Democrats hate the 1st Amendment when free speech, freedom of assembly or freedom of religion challenge them. Democrats have embraced Marxism and jihad. Republicans do not need to call Democrats “Nazis” because calling them “Democrats” is horrific enough. Explained.
315
3,108
9,238
138,213
David Opsahl retweeted
Replying to @MbarkCherguia
The history of the Climate Change hoax…
35
104
331
17,284
David Opsahl retweeted
So proud of this fellow Virginian and she is only 18 years old👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 An 18-year-old just did what billion-dollar water companies couldn't. Meet Mia Heller. A high school junior from Warrenton, Virginia who built a water filter in her garage that strips out 95.5% of microplastics from drinking water. That's better than most government treatment plants, which sit somewhere between 70% and 90%. Her secret weapon? Ferrofluid. A magnetized liquid made of oil and powder that latches onto microplastic particles. Then a magnet yanks them out. No membranes. No constant filter replacements. No endless maintenance bills. The ferrofluid even gets recycled, around 87% of it, in a closed loop. The spark for all of this wasn't a classroom project. It was a local newspaper article warning that her town's tap water was loaded with PFAS and microplastics, and that nobody was coming to fix it. So she watched her mom swap out filter after filter and thought, there has to be a smarter way. She built the prototype herself. Tested it with a homemade turbidity sensor. Then walked into the Regeneron International Science and Engineering Fair and walked out with a special award from the Patent and Trademark Office Society. Up against nearly 1,700 students from 62 countries. She's now eyeing a household version that sits under your kitchen sink. The future of clean water might not come from a lab in Silicon Valley. It might come from a teenager's garage in Virginia. Source- @SmithsonianMag
303
4,266
12,094
116,398
David Opsahl retweeted
May 22
To understand this, you have to realize something. Iryna wasn't Charlie Kirk. She wasn't a political pundit or controversial. She was simply a young White woman coming home from work. The reason that these are getting vandalized is because they hate White people and like when we get killed. They just want to murder White people. It's that simple
Iryna Zarustka had the wrong skin color Therefore, she can't have a mural
534
11,173
65,861
1,237,389
David Opsahl retweeted
A Norwegian neuroscientist spent 20 years proving that the act of writing by hand changes the human brain in ways typing physically cannot, and almost nobody outside her field has read the paper. Her name is Audrey van der Meer. She runs a brain research lab in Trondheim, and the paper that closed the argument was published in 2024 in a journal called Frontiers in Psychology. The finding is brutal enough that it should have changed every classroom on Earth. The experiment was simple. She recruited 36 university students and put each one in a cap with 256 sensors pressed against their scalp to record brain activity. Words flashed on a screen one at a time. Sometimes the students wrote the word by hand on a touchscreen using a digital pen, and sometimes they typed the same word on a keyboard. Every neural response was recorded for the full five seconds the word stayed on screen. Then her team looked at the part of the data most researchers had ignored for years, which is how different parts of the brain were communicating with each other during the task. When the students wrote by hand, the brain lit up everywhere at once. The regions responsible for memory, sensory integration, and the encoding of new information were all firing together in a coordinated pattern that spread across the entire cortex. The whole network was awake and connected. When the same students typed the same word, that pattern collapsed almost completely. Most of the brain went quiet, and the connections between regions that had been alive seconds earlier were nowhere to be found on the EEG. Same word, same brain, same person, and two completely different neurological events. The reason turned out to be something nobody had really paid attention to before her work. Writing by hand is not one motion but a sequence of thousands of tiny micro-movements coordinated with your eyes in real time, where each letter is a different shape that requires the brain to solve a slightly different spatial problem. Your fingers, wrist, vision, and the parts of your brain that track position in space are all working together to produce one letter, then the next, then the next. Typing throws all of that away. Every key on a keyboard requires the exact same finger motion regardless of which letter you are pressing, which means the brain has almost nothing to integrate and almost no problem to solve. Van der Meer said it plainly in her interviews. Pressing the same key with the same finger over and over does not stimulate the brain in any meaningful way, and she pointed out something that should scare every parent who handed their kid an iPad. Children who learn to read and write on tablets often cannot tell letters like b and d apart, because they have never physically felt with their bodies what it takes to actually produce those letters on a page. A decade before her, two researchers at Princeton ran the same fight using a completely different method and ended up at the same answer. Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer tested 327 students across three experiments, where half took notes on laptops with the internet disabled and half took notes by hand, before testing everyone on what they actually understood from the lectures they had watched. The handwriting group won by a wide margin on every question that required real understanding rather than surface recall. The reason was hiding in the transcripts of what the two groups had actually written down. The laptop students typed almost word for word, capturing more total content but processing almost none of it as they went, while the handwriting students physically could not write fast enough to transcribe a lecture in real time, which forced them to listen carefully, decide what actually mattered, and put it in their own words on the page. That single act of choosing what to keep was the learning itself, and the keyboard had quietly skipped the choosing and skipped the learning along with it. Two studies. Two countries. Same answer. Handwriting makes the brain work. Typing lets it coast. Every note you have ever typed instead of written went into your brain through a thinner pipe. Every meeting, every book highlight, every idea you captured on your phone instead of on paper was processed at half depth. You did not forget those things because your memory is bad. You forgot them because typing never woke the part of the brain that would have made them stick. The fix is the thing your grandmother already knew. Pick up a pen. Write the thing down. The slower road is the faster one.
2,472
44,653
120,863
10,361,106
David Opsahl retweeted
A new study analyzed daily temperatures from 992 long-running weather stations across 29 countries covering the years 1899 to 2024. Then it compared those temperatures to cumulative human CO2 emissions. They don't match. From 1899 to 1940, the planet warmed at a rate of 0.022 C per year, even though emissions were low. Then from 1941 to 1982, temperatures cooled, despite CO2 emissions more than tripling. From 1983 to 2024, warming returned, but slower than before, at a rate of 0.017 C per year, even as emissions rose 8.6 times higher than during the earlier warming phase. As the author concludes, "These findings challenge the conventional assumption that human-induced CO2 is the primary driver of global warming."
148
2,087
4,635
108,388