Author of 'Controlekramp', book-addict and free speech fundamentalist

Joined May 2024
21 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
Dat is geen verkeerde plek om te liggen.
2
18
691
Edwin Zasada retweeted
Eens👇 Ook de onderbouwing van de stelling: ‘‘als ontwikkelingshulp helpt het inkomen te verhogen, leidt dat in grote delen van Afrika eerder tot méér dan tot minder emigratie’’ komt uit onverdachte hoek, namelijk dit rapport van de Europese Commissie: publications.jrc.ec.europa.e

Migratiewetenschappers van links tot rechts, van Ruud Koopmans tot Hein de Haas, zijn het erover eens dat ontwikkelingswerk eerder tot meer migratie leidt dan tot minder. Mensen krijgen juist migratie-aspiraties wanneer hun leven beter wordt en ze over de grenzen van hun eigen kleine dorpje kunnen kijken. Het is bizar dat linkse partijen deze onzin blijven verspreiden. x.com/NPORadio1/status/20655

11
127
312
8,525
Edwin Zasada retweeted
and the police admitted they were the ones lying and giving out misinformation
'The viral video was shared on X by Elon Musk who said: “What kind of government arrests little girls who try to defend themselves?” But the schoolgirl was vilified when First Minister John Swinney condemned Musk’s defence as “deliberate misinformation” and the SNP leader accused the billionaire of trying to “undermine” community.' Goed om te weten wie nu echt misinformatie verspreide, wie nu echt probeerde de samenleving te ondermijnen. dailysceptic.org/2026/06/12/

1
1
30
Goh
Opnieuw meer mensen met bijstandsuitkering dan kwartaal eerder #WNL wnl.tv/2026/06/12/opnieuw-me

10
'The viral video was shared on X by Elon Musk who said: “What kind of government arrests little girls who try to defend themselves?” But the schoolgirl was vilified when First Minister John Swinney condemned Musk’s defence as “deliberate misinformation” and the SNP leader accused the billionaire of trying to “undermine” community.' Goed om te weten wie nu echt misinformatie verspreide, wie nu echt probeerde de samenleving te ondermijnen. dailysceptic.org/2026/06/12/

68
'So congratulations, race activists: you got everyone to see race. Now we have white race activists too, who say that because politicians “took the knee” for race rioters when it was BLM, no one can complain when they do it too.' unherd.com/newsroom/blms-sha

1
13
Prachtserie overigens.
Ondertussen kijkt @JeremyClarkson van @ClarksonsFarm1 de kunst af in NLđŸ‡łđŸ‡± â„č share.google/0VbKZQzep9BH1ZA

1
27
Edwin Zasada retweeted
The EU’s budgetary coup For the EU’s new multiannual budget the Commission has proposed a framework totalling almost €2 trillion, equivalent to around 1.26% of EU gross national income (GNI) over the seven-year period. The European Parliament, never shy about spending other people’s money, wants to push that to 1.38% of GNI. But neither institution really admits the structural tensions buried in the figures. The EU must service roughly €750 billion in bloc pandemic debt, the repayment of which is now being permanently integrated into the regular EU budget. The Commission’s own proposal earmarks €149.3 billion for repaying the so-called “NextGenerationEU Recovery” and “Resilience Facility” funds — a sum that amounts to nearly 10% of total MFF commitments. This matters because of what it reveals about the true nature of NextGenerationEU (NGEU). What was sold to European publics as an exceptional, one-off response to the Covid crisis is now the fiscal template for the Union’s future. The pandemic fund set the precedent: the EU can borrow on capital markets, distribute grants to member states, and then embed the repayment into the general budget for decades to come — all without anything resembling a proper democratic mandate. This is arguably what the “unprecedented” EU fiscal response to the pandemic was always about: normalising common debt as a mechanism for tilting the institutional balance of power decisively in favour of the Commission, downgrading member states and locking in a structural shift in European integration. Indeed, the EU has since repeated the trick with a €90 billion package for Ukraine, again funded through joint debt backed by the common budget. The “historical exception” has quietly become the norm. To repay its vast debts, the Commission has proposed a package of new levies on companies. But if the new taxes fall short, as is likely, the fallback is a compulsory levy on member states. The existing “Own Resources Decision” — another wonderful piece of EU lexicon — already empowers the Commission to call on national governments for additional GNI-based contributions to cover NGEU repayments, on top of regular programme spending. In other words, if the new revenue streams underperform, the bill lands automatically on national treasuries, decided not by sovereign parliaments, but by the remorseless logic of the EU’s debt repayment. At any rate, EU debt now functions as a de facto tax on member states, bypassing the normal channels of democratic budgetary control. Read my article on the EU’s budgetary coup here: unherd.com/2026/06/von-der-l

Von der Leyen is coming for Europe’s wallet The Multiannual Financial Framework. Even for a body as jargon-prone as the European Union, the phrase feels almost bewilderingly dull. Perhaps that’s the point. For hidden amid the technical language of the EU’s new budget is a kind of technocratic coup — one that promises more power for the Commission, less for member states, and which would ultimately make Brussels even less accountable than it already is today. Over the past decade, the EU’s institutional balance has already tilted heavily towards the Commission, which has extended its reach into areas once considered the preserve of national governments — from fiscal policy and public health to foreign affairs and defence. The mechanism has been consistent: each crisis — the sovereign debt crisis, Brexit, the Covid-19 pandemic, the Ukraine war — has served as a pretext for the Commission to assume more authority, make “emergency” decisions and lock in permanent changes to the exercise of EU power. None of this has required formal treaty changes. It has occurred surreptitiously, outside the arena of democratic debate, through what scholars have called “integration by stealth”. The result has been a creeping “Commissionisation” and supranationalisation of European decision-making, with a corresponding erosion of national sovereignty and democratic accountability. Now the Commission is using negotiations over the EU’s next seven-year budget — the aforementioned Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for 2028-2034 — to push this process further still. And precisely for this reason it is keen to wrap up a deal by the end of the year. Brussels insiders are acutely aware that the French presidential election of April 2027 could produce a government led by Jordan Bardella of the National Rally — a party hostile to the integrationist agenda underpinning the new MFF. Since the framework requires unanimous approval in the Council, a Eurosceptic France could strangle the budget at birth. The unstated but operative goal is to seal the deal before that risk appears. That this is never said openly only underscores the contempt for democratic deliberation that now pervades the process. Read my article on the EU’s latest power grab here: unherd.com/2026/06/von-der-l

5
120
229
15,053
Orwelliaanse naam ook, 'Democracy Shield'.
The European Commission is planning a full-scale attack on press freedom and free elections: Through the European Democracy Shield, it aims to reshape the media landscape and eliminate new media from market. May thanks to @shellenberger for publishing my research on his website: public.news/p/eu-demands-swe
 The measures under the Democracy Shield would result in censorship and create a network of state-run media: ▶ The EU plans to pump billions of euros of taxpayers’ money into selected media outlets, creating a network of state-run media to spread government narratives. ▶ State-selected and state-funded media outlets are to act as fact-checkers, creating an „archive of truth“ and working directly for EU authorities, especially during elections. ▶ With new laws, the EU aims to gain control over algorithms and decide what appears in feeds. ▶ Unwelcome media outlets are to be demonetized while political influencers are to be regulated in the name of supposed child protection. All details of my research:
1
15
Ja maar dat was niet de bedoeling. Misschien een wet maken dat alleen 'deugdzame' politici mogen kiezen om de wet niet te handhaven?
Martin Bosma over de hypocrisie rond de spreidingswet: "We moeten ook niet te krampachtig doen, want we zien dat heel veel gemeenten landelijke wetten aan hun laars lappen. Dus bijvoorbeeld in Amsterdam het boerkaverbod of de taaleis voor illegalen." "De loco-burgemeester van Amsterdam roept gewoon op dat de illegalen naar Amsterdam moeten komen. Dan mag alles maar. Dat is allemaal Sinterklaasje, kom maar binnen met je knecht." "En dan is die spreidingswet ineens heilig verklaard. Dus als het binnen de ideologie past van gemeenten, dan is het geen probleem. Dan is wetsovertreding nooit een argument." "Maar als het ineens over de spreidingswet gaat, dan roept iedereen we moeten ons wel aan de wet houden."
17
Oorzaak van de rellen gevonden, het is social media. Net als bij de mentale problematiek van jongeren en de verkiezingen van rechtse partijen. Snel verbieden dan maar, zodat we weer rustig op hetzelfde pad verder kunnen en de jeugd weer bloeit van geluk.
Geschokte reacties op racistisch geweld in Belfast, kritiek op rol sociale media rtl.nl/nieuws/buitenland/art

1
1
31
Controlekramp
the Belgian Prime Minister today at the “One Europe, one market” event: "there are twice as many people working on compliance compared to innovation in Europe."
17
De meest essentiële discussie op dit moment zou moeten gaan over wat het woord 'democratie' betekent. Semantische drift heeft de inhoud verwaterd tot op het punt dat er bijna nog meer werkzame stof in een homeopathisch middel zit, dan invloed van burgers in de moderne 'democratie'.
We have to shield democracy from disinformation, says @vonderleyen. In truth, her Orwellian "Democracy Shield" is about shielding the European Commission from democracy. And now, reveals @Pauline__Voss, the EU is financing "news" propaganda outfits to demand more censorship.
1
21
De utopieĂ«n worden met de dag gestoorder en gevaarlijker. 'Door stapsgewijs de werkweek te verkorten, vlakt de groei van de arbeidsinkomens af – en daarmee de consumptiegroei. Dat is een uiterst effectieve manier om de Jevons-paradox te doorbreken. Daardoor kunnen we onze economie twee keer sneller vergroenen dan met het huidige beleid, blijkt uit het GJR en andere bronnen.'
Jun 10
Economen en arbeidsmarktdeskundigen reageren op het idee van de Franse econoom Piketty om drastisch korter te gaan werken. Dat zou de planeet ten goede komen en ongelijkheid verminderen. Wat de ene expert een „haalbare visie” vindt, noemt de ander een „eco-socialistisch plan” dat „integraal in de prullenbak mag verdwijnen”. buff.ly/KJfcFmJ
16
Edwin Zasada retweeted
The Death of Satire
According to the UK government, you’re considered a terrorist if you believe that Western culture is under threat from mass migration. Yes, this is really on their website.
350
3,198
16,759
215,392
Edwin Zasada retweeted
We’ve moved very quickly from “two-tier policing doesn’t exist” to “two-tier policing does exist and it’s a good thing”.
🚹NEWS: David Lammy has effectively defended two tier policing claiming "Police can't always treat races equally"
285
3,171
18,896
32,655,408
Edwin Zasada retweeted
In the 18th century, the French philosopher Montesquieu wrote that trade "produces in men a certain feeling for exact justice." Modern empirical research reinforces that observation. humanprogress.org/why-free-t

11
36
5,123
'Two decades later, the world looks more like Lomborg’s spreadsheets than like the early-2000s apocalypse rhetoric. Emissions are rising more slowly than feared, climate-related disaster deaths have fallen, and poor countries still face more immediate threats from malaria, malnutrition and lack of basic infrastructure. Into this landscape, Bill Gates has recently stepped with a climate memo that reads uncannily like a Lomborg column.'
Bjorn Lomborg did not deny climate change, but treated it as one problem among many. The past 20 years vindicate his position: emissions are rising more slowly than feared, disaster deaths have fallen, and poverty remains a more acute threat than climate. humanprogress.org/a-vindicat

16
Edwin Zasada retweeted
There are more Arabs serving in the IDF, than Jews livings in Arab countries
Hit me with the harshest reality truth.
134
2,387
21,361
621,576