THIS Is How They Covered Up The COVID Vaxx’s DEADLY Side Effects! w/ Sen... youtu.be/ydkMwOp2Fhk?si=ByoM… via @YouTube

Beyond Geopolitics: China's Social Credit as an Anglo-American Construct... youtu.be/KBv5o6ugXtU?si=3nXg… via @YouTube

Oh. My. God. Look at what these Biolabs were MANUFACTURING… Anthrax, Tularaemia, Tuberculosis, Swine Fever, New Castles Disease, MERS, SARS, Marburg and Ebola THERE MUST BE ARRESTS

This is important. They are finally being forced to show the extend of their power. The EU might actually be a thing of the past some time in the 2030s. Good Riddance!

The biggest scandal of our lifetime Sen. Ron Johnson “the Covid shot adverse event cover up” The Government knew and the US media didn’t report it. In the UK the BBC, ITV, Sky, GB news and C4 all knew. The Times, Telegraph, Mail, Sun and Guardian knew. Because I told them in 2022

When your government lies, and your media shuts down all dissent.

Cynthia has done something really incredible in her new report (which will serve as the back bone of the upcoming "China Social Credit myth" film... Essentially she proves conclusively that the nefarious abusive technocracy fintech agencies which have entered China (and which controls Tencent and Alibaba) are actually driven by Silicon Valley Stargate operations, Softbank, and Goldman Sachs. Nothing Chinese about these. In part 2 she will prove how China has reined in these traitorous trojan horses cynthiachung.substack.com/p/…

The True Origins of China’s “Social Credit System” Part I, by @Cynthia_Rising open.substack.com/pub/cynthi…

Hospitals Took Bribes to Kill You and Blame It on COVID open.substack.com/pub/drwoja…

I know philosophers who dine out their whole career in exposition of the brilliant Hannah Arendt. When COVID-19 hit, every single one kept his mouth shut.

Canada, land of the dead (and the state's ongoing cover-up of that macabre toll), by @mcrispinmiller open.substack.com/pub/markcr…

Faldt lige over denne artikel fra december 2021, hvor 'videnskabens' stemmer vil have de danske børn fra 5-11 år vaccineret imod ´corona´. Prøv lige at se de dekorerede, forfremmede og anerkendte eksperter: Mellemrubrik: Skal skoler holdes åbne, skal flere vaccineres Selvom vaccinernes effektivitet er svækket af Omikron, kan de dog godt begrænse en hel del smitte, lød det fra sundhedsmyndighederne onsdag. - Det er rigtig nok, at du kun er delvis beskyttet som person imod at blive smittet. Men hvis vi kan få meget høj vaccinationsdækning blandt skolebørnene, kan vi halvere smitten blandt de vaccinerede børn, sagde faglig direktør i Statens Serum Institut Tyra Grove Krause. Hun påpegede, at der ”ingen tvivl” er, om at det i december har været landets børn, der har drevet smittespredningen i samfundet. Andelen af børn mellem 5 og 11 år, der har fået første stik, er kun nået op på 40 procent. Men skal skolerne holdes åbne hen over den næste måneds tid, skal det tal ifølge Tyra Grove Krause højere op. Og den pointe bakkes op af Jan Pravsgaard Christensen, der er professor i immunologi på Københavns Universitet. Han vurderer, at omkring 60-70 procent af en skole skal vaccineres, før en normal skolegang uden for mange nedlukninger kan gennemføres. Samtidig afviser han, at naturlig smitte af børnene vil være den rette fremgangsmåde. - Man ikke kan holde forskellige årgange – altså børn, voksne og ældre mennesker – adskilt. Og da vi har meget smitte lige nu, er der risiko for, at det spreder sig til forældrene og bedsteforældrene, sagde professoren tirsdag til TV 2.

In 2020, the IMF was offering Belarus President Lukashenko $940 million loan, provided he did "like in Italy." Here's exactly what that entailed:

Putin: "One line of Nord Stream 2 is still intact. We could start supplying gas to Germany tomorrow – just push a button. The only obstacle is a political decision by the German government. I was surprised to hear that Russia, this 'evil Russia', stopped supplying gas to Europe. We never stopped. Europe said no, hoping Russia would collapse. We didn't." Ironic, isn't it. They thought they'd set the trap for us, but walked into it themselves.

Der Europaabgeordnete Cristian Terheș fordert den sofortigen und bedingungslosen Rücktritt von Ursula von der Leyen. „71 Milliarden Euro an COVID-Impfstoff-Verträgen wurden für 4,6 Milliarden Dosen unterzeichnet – das sind 10 Dosen pro europäischem Bürger! Es läuft bereits eine strafrechtliche Untersuchung der Europäischen Staatsanwaltschaft (EPPO). Die Verträge? Komplett geschwärzt und vor der Öffentlichkeit versteckt. Wie kann so etwas in einer EU passieren, die behauptet, „transparent“ mit unserem Geld umzugehen?“

They armed NAZIS, killed ethnic Russians for 8 years, then told you the war started in 2022. And you were supposed to believe them. 31 May 2026 JoinTAB.us #ukraine #fraud #TAB #donbas @ShawnRyan762 @joerogan @patrickbetdavid

It always astonishes me how there is virtually ZERO public debate - or even public awareness - in Europe about the decisions that will most shape ordinary people's lives. These days, the EU is drafting a new anti-China legal framework where - quite literally - the more affordable and competitive Chinese products are, the more illegal they'd become. You'd think EU citizens would want to be informed about such things - as it couldn't be more consequential for their prosperity. Yet I bet virtually no EU citizen is even aware of it, beyond a vague sense that there is some sort of trade dispute going on. So what's going on exactly? It all centers around a new legal instrument the EU is drafting called the "overcapacity instrument" (euobserver.com/218003/china-…). First of all, the very notion of "overcapacity" is pretty ridiculous to begin with, especially the way it's being defined by the EU, as it basically means being competitive enough to export. By this definition of "overcapacity," pretty much every European industry that's ever run a trade surplus - German cars, French wine, Italian fashion - has been guilty of "overcapacity." I'm not even exaggerating: if you read this study by the EU Parliament on "Industrial overcapacities, with a focus on China" (europarl.europa.eu/RegData/e…), they define "overcapacity" as building more capacity than your domestic market can absorb. So the moment you build capacity to export abroad, you're in "overcapacity." Utterly ridiculous. And what this "overcapacity instrument" is about is creating a permanent legal mechanism for the EU to block Chinese competition across whole sectors of the economy, if they happen to be in "overcapacity." In effect, this means that if China is competitive globally in a given sector in such a way that it exports a lot, that's proof of overcapacity, and legally it'd mean that the entire sector can be restricted from the EU market. Which means it really, factually, is a legal framework where the more affordable and competitive your products are, the more illegal they become. Which is a CRAZY economic concept! 🤦‍♂️ Please note that it's different from the anti-subsidy legal instrument, which the EU has already put in place in 2023 (the "Foreign Subsidies Regulation": competition-policy.ec.europa…). This "overcapacity instrument" would be above and beyond this: it wouldn't even matter if a particular sector was subsidized by the Chinese government or not, the mere fact of its competitiveness in exports would be grounds for restrictions in the EU. It doesn't take a genius to understand how badly this could impact everyday people: this is European consumers being forced to pay more for worse products by law, so that uncompetitive European firms don't have to improve. Politicians frame it as avoiding a "China shock 2.0" but really this is choosing an even steeper self-inflicted decline than is already the case, where EU citizens would subsidize mediocre EU companies that would have even less pressure to catch up. It's a hidden tax: subsidies for uncompetitive firms paid by consumers instead of governments, which in turn makes them less incentivized to become competitive. The first "China shock" did de-industrialize Europe somewhat, but at least it made things cheaper for European consumers. If this becomes Europe's response to a second "China shock" not only it'd make everything more expensive but it'd do nothing for EU industry: you don't become competitive by banning the competition... Look at China itself: the way it industrialized was NOT by banning Western firms but on the contrary by welcoming them strategically and learning from them. You learn to compete by... competing, duh! What I find most shocking in all of this isn't even the policy itself - you can make arguments for and against protectionism, and reasonable people can disagree. What's shocking is that virtually no European media outlet is explaining any of this to the public. This is unarguably one of the single most consequential economic decisions the EU will make this decade, affecting the price of everything, and it's being drafted in near-total silence. No newspaper is running the headline "EU plans to make Chinese goods illegal if they're too affordable" - even though that's essentially what's happening. But that's what you call a "democracy" with "freedom of expression" these days apparently...

80 studies find—that most now know that "vaccination" caused mass deaths; FDA (& Canada) have buried evidence; Fauci under fire for running CIA's Wuhan cover-up; DoD halts mandatory flu shots; more , by @mcrispinmiller open.substack.com/pub/markcr…

🚨🇩🇪 Alice Weidel ERUPTS in the German Parliament: "An extremist is someone who maintains open borders, and someone who is destroying freedom of speech!"

RFK Jr. called it a “trick”. Dr. John Campbell called it “sly”. Journals called it science. @ClareCraigPath just discussed one of the biggest scandals of our time with @Johnincarlisle which led to a “double whammy”. Dr. Clare Craig (UK): “They were putting those illnesses onto the unvaccinated group, and exaggerating the problem for the unvaccinated... so you’ve got a sort of double whammy.” Dr. Campbell: “Pretty sly trick really” And an Italian peer reviewed paper by Alessandria et al has now revealed how the “case counting window bias” meant that any deaths, hospitalizations, infections, or adverse events in that window were counted in the unvaccinated group. This “sly” statistical trick was used to sell “Pandemic of the Unvaccinated” and maintain the “safe and effective” narrative. Robert F Kennedy Jr. - “The offical data do not not count you as vaccinated until 2 weeks after the second shot... the deaths that happened during that first 6 weeks are attributed to unvaccinated people... it's a trick, it's statistical trick”. Legacy media still hasn’t covered this scandal.