Joined October 2021
690 Photos and videos
How retweeted
This is long overdue! If you think @parkrunUK should respect the law please share! Let’s get female categories protected for women only! @mara_yamauchi @Sport_England @sharrond62 @runthinkwrite @AjaTheEmpress @DerryBanShee @ForWomenScot @WomensRightsNet @jo_bartosch @Martina
55
921
2,759
143,654
How retweeted
đŸ§”The judgment in @ForWomenScot has caused shockwaves, but not about anything it actually says. The panic & confusion is all about rectifying a practice which was already known to be unlawful but has proliferated anyway: the provision of single-sex services on a self-ID basis —
42
915
4,525
326,455
17 Apr 2025
Replying to @LBC @cool2btrans
Maybe show this to Katie, it may help.
1
2
1,288
17 Apr 2025
And this
897
How retweeted
Replying to @JamesBlunt
JOE BANGLES
43
195
1,269
106,026
4 Sep 2024
Hey Dave, I can still see your posts above Gary’s, so just for the record, you didn’t block me because “that’s enough how for now” you blocked because you’re an ignorant dangerous plank that doesn’t like hearing the truth about the abhorrent ideology you support. đŸ‘đŸ»
2
5
2,060
4 Sep 2024
In response to another reply behind a block that I can see but cannot respond directly to. No. You’ve dismissed the sources because you are so far down the rabbit hole you refuse to look at anything remotely factual. That’s why you blocked. Protecting children is not bigotry.
2
5
1,694
How retweeted
19 Aug 2024
Griffin Sivert just wanted love, acceptance, a community to belong to
 Just like any other 13-year-old (the age at which she first socially transitioned), she wanted to fit in and feel that she was loved and respected by her peers. Had she grown up a decade sooner, she might have dressed “emo” for a while, dyeing her hair black and experimenting with bold makeup as a way to explore her identity and give her an edge. Perhaps she would have taken to occasionally smoking or drinking behind her parents’ backs. Or maybe she would have simply joined the school art club, where she could find friends, and that would have been enough. Instead, she grew up in a culture that is deeply sick. A culture that leads vulnerable children to believe that permanently destroying their bodies with drugs and surgeries is the only path to true happiness, while medical institutions readily provide this so-called “care.” Griffin got on the path of bodily modification and never got off it. She was perpetually chasing an imaginary end point at which the cosmetic interventions would make her feel worthy. The testosterone wasn’t enough, the double mastectomy wasn’t enough, and neither was the hysterectomy. Then, the phalloplasty brought years of excruciating pain and severe health complications, ultimately leading to her death at only 24. I urge trans activists/"allies" to reflect on what has happened here. Please consider the possibility that encouraging others to accept their bodies as they *are* rather than encouraging them to undergo dangerous medical interventions is VERY far from *hateful*. In fact, it is the only truly compassionate approach.
191
1,246
4,873
261,089
How retweeted
Having male biology is not simply another type of advantage athletes have, it’s an advantage we have created categories around. We all seem to agree that having a woman’s category is desirable and necessary, we all know it’s because men are, as a group, bigger and stronger etc, and that without protection from male advantage, women wouldn’t win in athletics sports. So it’s perfectly coherent to argue that anyone with this type of advantage - male advantage - is ineligible for the category designed to exclude it.
18
179
2,235
37,065
How retweeted
Hilary Cass raises some similar concerns about NHS adult gender services as she has re the NHS children’s clinic. Something has gone seriously wrong in this branch of healthcare.
NEW: A damning letter from Dr Hilary Cass to NHS England bosses, detailing serious concerns about adult gender clinics has been published. NHSE haven't drawn attention to it, instead releasing an update on implementation of Cass’s recommendations for children’s gender services.đŸ§”
6
110
544
17,865
How retweeted
NEW: A damning letter from Dr Hilary Cass to NHS England bosses, detailing serious concerns about adult gender clinics has been published. NHSE haven't drawn attention to it, instead releasing an update on implementation of Cass’s recommendations for children’s gender services.đŸ§”
59
1,275
3,313
354,720
How retweeted
Dear TRAs Notice how “the TERFs” didn’t protest Hergie Bacyadan, a woman who claims to be a man, competing in women’s sport at the Olympics? One more time for the cheap seats at the back: Bodies play sport not identities. Why didn’t you care that her identity wasn’t validated?
112
761
3,921
82,782
How retweeted
The BMA’s stance on puberty blockers defies the key principle of medicine: first, do no harm
 excellent, informed critique from ⁊⁊@soniasodha⁩ theguardian.com/commentisfre

55
252
932
45,419
How retweeted
4 Aug 2024
This is very important new information. Test results seen by an independent, award-winning journalist. Sent to the IOC in June 2023 and ignored. Please can we boost this? x.com/alanabrahamson/status/


1
4
7
333
#sex isn't complicated.
1
3
634
How retweeted
3 Aug 2024
The European Vice President of the World Boxing Organization has come forward to confirm that Algerian boxer Imane Khelif is male. István Kovács says he warned the Olympic Committee about several male boxers in the women's category, but nothing was done. reduxx.info/international-ol

1,100
10,796
31,841
5,884,937
How retweeted
Replying to @muuntaimu @reduxx
Nah it’s medical information. They absolutely could and would be sued. But if Lin and Khelif consent to those records being released, or release the records themselves, that would be fine. So why aren’t they?
11
21
325
27,653
How retweeted
I absolutely despise essay-posting but as the co-owner of the outlet (@reduxx) that broke the news about Khelif and Lin and started this wildfire, I feel compelled to put to bed some of the bullshit surrounding this story. A rapid-fire FAQ: 1. "L & K are just women with high testosterone!" Khelif and Lin were never tested for their testosterone levels. The claims that they were disqualified from the 2023 Women's World Boxing Championship due to simple testosterone abnormalities were made by their respective national sporting bodies, who, obviously, have some motivation to lie here. 2. "L & K have female ID!" Khelif and Lin are not believed to be transgender, and @reduxx made that VERY clear in our July 28 article. They are believed to be impacted by a Difference of Sexual Development, in which there is a developmental abnormality in secondary sex characteristics. This is a medical condition which can manifest with children being born with ambiguous or disfigured genitalia. Male children impacted by DSDs are often "assigned female at birth" due to these genital defects, as there is a genuine assumption they are girls. Thus, their identification documents would be completely irrelevant in this case. As is the fact they were "raised as girls." That's entirely expected for male children with DSDs. Even more so for male children with DSDs in socially conservative countries. Is a boy without a penis more likely to be raised as a boy or a girl? Exactly. 3. "The IBA never said they had XY chromosomes!" On March 25, 2023, IBA President Umar Kremlev said that the boxers disqualified at the championships had XY chromosomes. He said this in a statement to TASS News. There were only two boxers disqualified at the championships: Lin and Khelif. 4. "But Kremlev could be lying!" Over the last 72 hours, the IBA has released two separate statements confirming that Khelif and Lin were not subject to testosterone testing, but had instead been subjected to a separate test validated by two independent laboratories. That test confirmed they were not eligible to compete in women's boxing as per the IBA guidelines. Crucially, the IBA defines "woman" as "an individual with XX chromosomes." In their guidelines, they also indicate that the gender tests they use to determine if a person is eligible to compete with women is a chromosomal test, not a hormone test. In their second statement, the IBA condemned the IOC for allowing Khelif and Lin to proceed as they believed it was putting female boxers at risk and that they did not support "boxing between the genders." 5. "Why doesn't the IBA release the test!" They cannot. It is protected medical information. They would be sued. Khelif and Lin, however, can agree to have the laboratories release those tests themselves... Why haven't they? 6. "The IBA didn't let L & K appeal their disqualification!" Yes they did. They have no choice in the matter. The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) is a fully independent tribunal which oversees all disputes in elite athletics. Every athlete has a right to bring a case to the CAS. Lin did not challenge the disqualification. Khelif challenged the disqualification but withdrew the appeal before it could proceed through the court. Please ask yourself why. If they were genuinely female, why would they have chosen to refuse their opportunity to establish that in an irrefutable and legally binding way at a fully independent venue? Literally none of this would have happened had they simply submitted their tests to the CAS. Buuuut... Consider that all decisions at the CAS are public information. It was through a CAS challenge that the world became aware that Caster Semenya had XY chromosomes, for example. If Khelif and Lin had proceeded through the CAS, there would have been irrefutable evidence, documented by an independent body, that they were either male or female. So why? Why did they not want the CAS to examine their tests? Why did they not want this information to be public? I think the reason is obvious. 7. "But the IOC approved their eligibility for 2024!" The IOC stopped sex testing athletes in 1999. Since then, they have deferred to individual sporting bodies to ensure athletes were eligible. HOWEVER, for the purposes of the 2024 Paris Olympics, there is no formal oversight body for boxing. This is the first time this ever happened. As a result, the IOC created an ad-hoc boxing unit to temporarily oversee the boxing competitions in Paris. This unit has no guidelines for gender eligibility, and has apparently just been allowing boxers to compete "as females" if they have female gender markers on their passports/legal documents. 8. "The IBA is corrupt and cannot be trusted!" The IOC has long had an issue with the IBA because the IBA has refused to disqualify Russian athletes on the basis of their national identity. Claims of the IBA's "corruption" can basically be summarized to "Russia bad, Russians evil." The IBA has literally no history of bullshitting about the sex of boxers involved and it doesn't benefit them in any kind of way to do so. 9. "The IBA only disqualified L & K because they beat Russian boxers at the 2023 championships!" No they did not. I started seeing this weird, completely false claim circulating over the last 24 hours. Khelif beat Thailand's Janjaem Suwannapheng and was set to compete against China's Yang Liu for gold in the Welterweight category. Lin beat Bulgaria's Svetlana Kamenova Staneva for bronze in the Featherweight category. They were scheduled to fight no Russian boxers in either one of their categories, and only one Russian boxer won a gold medal in the entire championship (Anastasiia Demurchian, Light Middleweight). India won the most gold medals (4) at the 2023 Women's Championship. China won the most medals overall (7). Kazakhstan won the second most medals overall (6). Russia only won 3 medals at the championship. Also worth noting that another Taiwanese boxer, Huang Hsiao-wen, won gold in the Bantamweight category. So for all the Taiwanese mouthpieces claiming Lin's disqualification was just "discrimination against Taiwan"... lol no. 10. "L & K were only singled out because they don't look feminine!" This idea that Lin and Khelif were singled out for not meeting some "western feminine beauty standard" is atrocious and quite easily refutable when you look at literally any of their competitors, most of whom do not meet that arbitrary standard themselves because boxing is a physically demanding sport for robust people, male or female. Below is Khadija El-Mardi of Morocco, for example, who likely would be accused of failing to meet this supposed "western feminine beauty standard." El-Mardi won gold in the Heavyweight category at the 2023 World Championships. She is advancing to the quarter-finals in Paris as we speak. She's one of the best female boxers out there. She is a woman. Her features and tall stature literally do not matter. She is biologically female. Sex testing would return an XX. Women are adult human females. This is true regardless of their external appearance. Likewise, men are adult human males. This is true regardless of abnormalities or defects in their secondary sex characteristics.
2 Aug 2024
🚹BREAKING🚹 Taiwan's Lin Yu-Ting has won against Uzbekistan's Sitora Turdibekova, beating her in all three rounds of the Women's Featherweight Boxing preliminary. Lin had previously been disqualified from the 2023 Women’s World Boxing Championship for having "XY chromosomes."
895
5,120
14,361
4,734,620
How retweeted
2 Aug 2024
1) Legally, yes. Biologically - we do not know, which is why people are asking genuine and valid questions. 2) Yes 3) Yes 4) IOC criteria that do not require proof of biological sex. Do you think it is right that boxers are required to step on the scales to prove that they are eligible to compete in different weight categories? Or do you think the IOC should be happy to accept a document where they declare their own weight? Do you think that it is fair that we have (for very good reason) sex categories in sport but the IOC will not even carry out a simple cheek swab to verify sex? Do you think fairness and safety for women in sport is just something for men like you to joke about?
1
1
7
239