Four Palestine Action activists who damaged Israeli military assets including drones will be sentenced for an âact of terrorismâ, a judge has ruled.
Charlotte Head, 29, Samuel Corner, 23, Leona (Ellie) Kamio, 30, and Fatema Rajwani, 21, were found guilty of criminal damage in May after breaking into a factory in Filton, near Bristol, owned by Israeli weapons manufacturer Elbit in 2024. Corner was also convicted of grievous bodily harm without intent.
Justice Jeremy Johnson told the Woolwich crown court that he found that the defendants âwere well awareâ of âthe aims and strategy of Palestine Actionâ and that the raid was aimed at âshutting down Elbit and ending what they regarded as British complicity in Israeli war crimesâ and to âintimidate it into ceasing operations or cause the government to prevent it from operatingâ.
The destruction of military assets was âone part of a broader and more strategic purposeâ to âshut down Elbitâ and put âpressure on the governmentâ, he said. He cited the destruction to things which could not be described as weapons including the âsmashing of a disabled toiletâ and the spraying of paint on the walls.
âI am bound by the legislation to find that the offence in each case has a terrorism connectionâ, he said.
Rajwani held her head in her hands as the judge made his remarks. Chants of hundreds of supporters of the activists gathered outside the court complex could be heard from inside the courtroom. Sentencing is expected later today.
Details of the military drones damaged in the raid emerged as part of a submission from the prosecution, as it argued that the scale of the damage was significant enough to justify the application of a âterrorist connectionâ to the direct action group in sentencing.
In court, Mira Hammad KC, representing Kamio, referred to the prosecutionâs evidence which included a report from an independent forensic consultant who reviewed Elbitâs insurance claim following the raid. His report listed damage to military assets including the âMagni Xâ drone and multiple âThorâ drones in the âLegion Xâ and âHeliosâ configurations.
Deanna Heer KC, speaking for the prosecution, argued that the activists wanted to influence the UK government and Israeli government and encouraged the judge to consider the âideologyâ of Palestine Action and its âultimate causeâ to âliberate Palestine from Israelâ.
She pointed to a Palestine Action training manual which referred to Britainâs âimperialâ role in the middle east, which she said showed that the raid was not a simple act of crime prevention.
Prosecutors estimate that around ÂŁ1.2m in damage was caused by the activists, including the military assets. The nature and scale of the damage to private property meant that âthis is not a protest, freedom of assembly caseâ, she said.
Read the full article:
novara.media/44bcB9X