To paraphrase Blake: Partial truths told with bad intent beat all the lies you can invent. I try to be the antidote to that.

Joined November 2024
40 Photos and videos
One of many denier strategies-the appeal to nature fallacy : it's 'natural', therefore good, they say, regardless of concentration. Radon and hydrogen sulfide are also natural. Wouldn't want those accumulating in your basement. Their arguments stink like H₂S #climatebrawl
Methane is a natural emission from the Earth not pollution. It interacts with a small portion of the frequencies Water Vapour dominates. The entire GHG effect can't melt frost. Its over hyped due to Globalist Marketing, and greedy politicians. Volcanos, fault lines, the ground in general emits methane as do you. There is less than 2 ppm methane. #climate of make it loud and make it scary for #carbontax #cdnpoli #bcpoli
1
1
11
TheAntidote retweeted
Replying to @gurunimenunir1
Then why is the world getting warmer when orbital cycles would see it slowly cooling over the last few decades? 🤔
3
8
258
3,601
This dude has a philosophy degree but has the audacity to accuse, with zero evidence, climatologists and the cancer-hazard-identifying organization, IARC, of corruption. Meanwhile he defends @ACSHorg another organization whose president is a climate change denier. #climatebrawl
b) climate change has been overblown (by the corrupted scientists peer reviewing each other and sharing funding). The issue is about destroying trust in science and ACSH is trying to stop the bastards who keep doing that So how am I dubious? Better go and ask your friends again.
5
72
> 50% of @Meta 's revenue now comes from, not Fakebook, but from InstantGramOfDope , a.k.a. @instagram The whole enterprise is totally useless to a rational society, but thanks to idiotic advertising, they receive in excess of $195 billion in revenue. What a world we live in!
28
If Monsanto had been smart, they could've (1) warned users to wear protective equipment (2) not marketed the product for frivolous use around the home(3)not tried to influence scientific publications & start a PR op. Bayer did not do their HW & overpaid for a sloppy company.
The idea that glyphosate “causes cancer” took off after a hazard classification from in 2015, while regulatory agencies concluded it is unlikely to pose a carcinogenic risk at real-world exposure levels. And here we are a decade later, still re-litigating the same selective interpretation. Such a tiresome waste of time.
34
The barber will say that the haircut was the greatest achievement. Without it, hair would grow in front of the eyes, and when you can't see, it's difficult to grow food and do chemistry and do high pressure engineering needed to mass- produce fertilizer.
The greatest achievement in human history isn’t getting a few satellites into space. It’s feeding 8 billion people every day. The fact that many people find rockets more exciting than agriculture says more about human psychology than human priorities.
1
28
You forgot to mention that the best estimates suggest that roughly 2–5% of all cancers are caused by exposure to environmental chemicals and pollutants in the general environment.
Replying to @simonmaechling
In the study below, alcohol caused 4% of all cases of cancer 🍷🍾. Tobacco causes 20% 🚬. Obesity 4% - 8% 🫃. thelancet.com/article/S1470-… cancer.org/cancer/risk-preve… pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/article…
1
27
Go to South Korea. Taste their coffee, and then you'll realize that most coffee in North America tastes like the work of the devil.
There are some people who want to convince you to give up coffee in the morning. Such people are proof of the devil
30
Free market fundamentalists are a lost cause. They're akin to Jehova Witnesses. They take one section of a book literally; lobby it door to door of politicians and believe that only their devoutness will save us from the Apocalypse of economic doom or totalitarianism.
Replying to @globeandmail
Collective my ass. This is the direct result of liberal policies. And who elected the liberals? SENIORS!
21
Stick to drooling at runway models because you're too much of a dumbass to understand how scientific models work.
Replying to @cohler
There are two types of models…the ones on the catwalk …and the ones on computers…and they are both fake
13
You're blaming all the greenhouse gas emissions on women? Wait till I tell your wife! #climatebrawl
1
2
44
Historically, some groups of chemists and laboratory workers did have elevated cancer risks because they were exposed to substances now known to be carcinogenic, such as benzene, aromatic amines, & some chlorinated solvents. Lab standards have now improved.
Notice that chemophobia rarely comes from chemists? The people who spend their careers studying molecules, toxicology, exposure, and risk tend to be the least afraid of “chemicals.” Why do you think that is?
16
Their hidden agenda is to get people convinced that newly created compounds have been exhaustively tested; to get people to conclude that regulation is overreaching. Recently Simon called for IARC to be eliminated. They identify carcinogens for the public. He ain't pro-science!
I reckon their "hidden agendas" are largely to advertise people examin data and evidence correctly. Science is an ongoing process of examination and self correction, if you have a specific error you want to bring to the table, do so 🤷‍♀️ I too can't be arsed with creationism.
31
That's not the point here. Simon is just using a strawman argument to serve his hidden agenda: get public opinion on industry's side so they face less lawsuits and less regulation.
Replying to @simonmaechling
To be honest, scientists are not the best at marketing themselves or their discoveries.
1
50
TheAntidote retweeted
WARNING READERS ! A climate denier has posted nonsense into this conversation. ALWAYS ignore climate deniers except to refute their nonsense. For the record the burden of proof is on anyone attempting to overthrow accepted science eg AGW/ACC - see A.1 ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/resou…
1
3
54
That it was poorly and inconsistently implemented doesn't make it a sham, Einstein. A price on carbon is 1 of many necessary strategies needed to mitigate climate change. You can't keep sweeping costs of climate change under the rug and then celebrate inflated "economic growth".
Replying to @ryankatzrosene
Aww poor you Ryan the stupid carbon tax that you supported has finally been realized for the sham it is.
65
#ClimateBrawl We all know science deniers are old decrepit liarsm I wonder if Robin was even alive when that paper based on ONLY one tiny spot in the UK was published. So why do these miscreants & psychotics rely on very old papers? Because they want you to be equally ignorant
H. H. Lamb, Meteorological Office, Bracknell, Berks Great Britain: "Evidence has been accumulating in many fields of investigation pointing to a notably warm climate in many parts of the world, that lasted a few centuries around A.D. 1000–1200, and was followed by a decline of temperature levels till between 1500 and 1700 the coldest phase since the last ice age occurred... Changes of prevailing temperature and rainfall in England between periods of 50–150 years duration around 1200 and around 1600 are found which, on all the evidence at present available, probably amounted to 1.2–1.4°C and 10% respectively."
3
4
18
602
Atomic models; model of DNA; standard model of particle physics; models of climate science....these are not runway models. But maybe your time would be better spent looking at their legs &criticizing them rather than looking at other models that are over your head. #climatebrawl
Modelling is worthless. Garbage in = Garbage out to suit the climate scam narrative.
1
31
TheAntidote retweeted
Replying to @derkoceleste
You’re a victim of misinformation
2
2
15
399