“Everything you add to the truth subtracts from the truth.” "The simple step of a courageous individual is not to take part in the lie. “In our country the lie has become not just a moral category but a pillar of the State.” —Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

En 2023, un homme s'assoit face au Tout-New York les annonceurs, les journalistes, les puissants et dit tout haut ce que personne n'osait dire. Que le roi était nu. « Ce que je vois partout, ce sont des gens obsédés par l'idée de paraître bons tout en faisant le mal. Qu'ils aillent se faire foutre. » Tablée glacée. Carrière finie, disaient-ils. Boycott. La fin de X. Le 12 juin 2026, ce même homme est devenu le premier trillionaire de l'histoire. Devinez la suite.

The worst leftists believe white people deserve endless brutal punishment from brown people. They’re happy to sacrifice white girls and boys to total savagery because no real atonement for past sins is possible. It’s a death cult.

This is a classic case of elite incestuous self-dealing dressed up in progressive "gender equity" drag. Let me walk you through the whole grift, piece by piece. 🏠 The $9.1 Million "Pritzker Discount" Mansion In November 2024, the Newsoms acquired a 5,600-square-foot, six-bedroom midcentury modern estate at 224 Woodland Road in Kentfield, Marin County — one of the wealthiest enclaves in America. The seller: Daniel Pritzker, billionaire heir to the Hyatt Hotels fortune. The price: $9.1 million — which was actually $600,000 over the final asking price of $8.5 million. The property had originally been listed at $10.75 million, then dropped to $9.5 million, then to $8.5 million. Somehow the Newsoms swooped in and paid more than what the market was demanding. Curious. The vehicle: The home was purchased through MHBD Farms LLC — an entity created just two days before the transaction closed on November 14, 2024. The LLC is named after the Newsoms' four children. Jennifer Siebel Newsom was later listed as the manager of that LLC as of May 2025. This is the second time the Newsoms have used a mysterious LLC to acquire real estate. In 2018–2019, an LLC registered to Newsom's cousin and PlumpJack business partner Jeremy Scherer bought a $3.7 million Fair Oaks estate in cash, then "gifted" it to the Newsoms — conveniently avoiding the transfer tax. 💰 The Pritzker Connection — It's Deeper Than Real Estate This wasn't some arm's-length transaction between strangers. The Pritzker family were Gavin Newsom's first-ever political donors when he launched his career. That's not a coincidence — that's a long-term patronage relationship. The Pritzker family — through their various entities and foundations — contributed roughly $572,000 to the California Partners Project, Jennifer Siebel Newsom's "gender equity" nonprofit. Let's sit with that: the family that sold the Newsoms a mansion also shoveled over half a million into the First Partner's charity. And that charity is where the real action is. 🎭 The "Nonprofit" Industrial Complex Jennifer Siebel Newsom runs a multi-layered financial ecosystem that blurs every line between charity, personal enrichment, political influence, and taxpayer funding. The Three-Headed Beast: View the second image in the first comment below. 💸 The Numbers — Follow the Money The Representation Project (2011–2024): •$1.8 million paid directly to Jennifer Siebel Newsom in salary (per IRS filings) •$1.6 million paid to her for-profit company Girls Club Entertainment for "writer/producer/director" fees •Combined total from the nonprofit to her and her company: roughly $3.4 million over roughly 13 years •Annual take: approximately $300,000 (salary GCE payments) — roughly a third of the nonprofit's total annual income in recent years •Her 2024 salary was $161,250; GCE received an identical $161,250 The California Partners Project (2020–present): •Gavin Newsom has solicited $4.8 million in behested payments for this nonprofit •$1.8 million of that came from the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria (the casino tribe — more on that below) •$572,000 from the Pritzker family •Other donors include Silicon Valley Bank ($100K), Blue Shield of California ($50K), and the New Venture Fund ($100K) The Office of the First Partner (taxpayer-funded): •Created by Gavin Newsom in 2019 as a division of the governor's office •Armed with roughly $5 million in cumulative taxpayer funding •Staffed by nine employees with an annual budget of over $1.1 million as of 2023 •This government office openly "shares resources" with the California Partners Project to launch advocacy campaigns •Siebel Newsom used this platform to push for billions in school mental health funding — while her nonprofit sells the curricula and films to those same schools 🎰 The Graton Rancheria Quid Pro Quo This is the most brazen piece. The Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria, which operates the Graton Resort & Casino in Sonoma County, donated $1 million to the California Partners Project at Gavin Newsom's personal solicitation. Around that same time, Newsom used his office to block the Koi Nation, a smaller tribe, from building a competing casino near Graton's operation. Ethics watchdogs — including Michael Chamberlain of Protect the Public's Trust — flagged this as a potential violation of California conflict-of-interest law requiring officials to recuse themselves from matters involving entities that have donated to their family's charities. The timeline screams quid pro quo: 1. Newsom asks tribe for donation to wife's charity 2. Tribe writes check 3. Newsom blocks tribe's competitor That's not governance. That's a protection racket with better branding. 🏫 The School Pipeline — Taxpayer Dollars Into Her Pocket The California Board of Education adopted guidance recommending Siebel Newsom's films and curricula for classroom use the same year Gavin became governor. The Representation Project licenses these films to school districts at roughly $270 per district. By her own boast, 2.6 million students have seen the films nationwide. The films include titles like Miss Representation, The Mask You Live In, The Great American Lie, and Fair Play — all pushing radical gender ideology. The Office of the First Partner used its taxpayer-funded platform to advocate for $5 billion in youth mental health spending and 10,000 new school counselors — who were then positioned to purchase her materials. Corporate donors to The Representation Project include PG&E, AT&T, Comcast, and Kaiser Permanente — all entities with massive business before the governor's office. Kaiser alone has received state contracts exceeding $35 million during Newsom's tenure. PG&E donated $25,000 to a Representation Project fundraiser a week after Newsom's 2018 election, while facing government scrutiny for its role in California wildfires. 🔍 The Federal Investigation As of June 2026, the DOJ is actively investigating the Newsoms' finances — including Jennifer Siebel Newsom's taxes, her nonprofits, and the flow of money between them. Federal investigators have been contacting donors, former and current employees, and board members connected to her organizations. Gavin Newsom is, predictably, framing this as political retaliation from the Trump administration. But the paper trail — the behested payments, the LLC shell games, the self-dealing between her nonprofit and her for-profit company, the donor-to-policy pipeline — was all out in the open long before any federal probe. 🎯 The Bottom Line What you're looking at is a closed-loop influence-peddling system: •Billionaire family (Pritzker) donates to wife's charity and sells the couple a mansion •Governor solicits millions for wife's nonprofit from entities with business before the state •Wife draws salary from her own nonprofit while her private company gets paid by that same nonprofit •Taxpayers fund her government office, which promotes the agenda her films sell •Schools buy her licensed content with money her husband's policies allocated •Donors get favorable treatment, blocked competition, and no-bid contracts The $9.1 million Pritzker mansion isn't just a house. It's a monument to how the political class converts public trust into private wealth — all while lecturing the rest of us about equity and justice.

This is legitimately sickening: > the sitting prime minister Keir Starmer presided over public prosecutions of thousands of rape cases > he let **13,000** suspected rape gang members and pedophiles off with **warning letters** > now that this information is blowing up on x, he is leading the charge to ban x I knew it was bad, I didn't know it was this bad It would be difficult to imagine a more evil and treasonous politician. This is movie-level evil.

Another great article by @ShamashAran that hits the bullseye 🎯 I am 100% in agreement with this perspective.

Still the most insane poll that I’ve ever seen.

Imagine going 116 mph and being pulled over by a Va State Trooper while you’re a member of the House of Delegates at 1am after a party, avoiding mandatory jail time, then turning in 500 hours of “community service” for your own political action committee before tweeting “nobody is above accountability.”

🤣To think that this sketch is 9 years old now. Welcome to the Real Housewives of ISIS. It’s solid satire & still relevant because it hits home at “progressive” left wing politics, culture, religion, & ideological blindness. Mock those denying reality. youtu.be/JHGgv6p7uVI?is=THj-…

Note: @ElonMusk runs companies that make electric cars and reusable space rockets, while @HasanTheHun makes… Twitch streams.

If I had Elon's money I would solve world hunger instantly.😡 Sent from a device purchased with with a sum of money that could have been used to feed an Ethiopian family for a year, but wasn't, because my generosity is purely hypothetical.

Don’t take it for granted! Every place in the world has things it can improve (some much more than others) but psychologically, it boils down to a basic human formula: H = (G F) - E H: Happiness (The net state of fulfillment) G: Gratitude (The appreciation of current reality) F: Freedom (The autonomy to live authentically) E: Envy (The toxic comparison to others) Think about it. If you are feeling unhappy in life, check your variables & make adjustments. Envy can bankrupt your happiness. And good BBQ is always a multiplier to Gratitude!

"happiness = quality of life minus envy."

For the record. SpaceX, Hayek, and the Progressive War on Wealth Creation The progressive left clings to the fantasy that wealth is manufactured by the state and its pet technocrats rather than by entrepreneurs who risk their own capital to create real value. In their mythology, government planners are the heroic “designers” of prosperity, while the private sector is a problem to be taxed, regulated, and morally lectured. As Hayek warned, “the more the state ‘plans’ the more difficult planning becomes for the individual,” and progressives are determined to make individual planning all but impossible. Their entire project rests on a basic fraud, confusing redistribution with creation. Social-democratic and socialist progressives boast about “fairness” and “equity,” but their toolkit is nothing more than confiscation and reallocation, slicing the same pie thinner while pretending they’ve baked a new one. Hayek’s point that “there is all the difference in the world between treating people equally and attempting to make them equal” goes straight over their heads, they weaponize the latter to justify endless expropriation from those who actually produce. The manufactured outrage on the progressive left over the SpaceX IPO is not about fraud, abuse, or failure, it is about their ongoing indoctrination campaign to portray success, risk-taking, and genuine wealth creation as moral crimes. A private company goes from “10 percent chance of success” to one of the most valuable enterprises on earth, and their instinctive response is not admiration or curiosity, but rage that such achievement is even allowed to exist. They see Elon Musk’s trillionaire status not as the byproduct of extraordinary innovation and execution, but as a kind of cosmic theft that must be punished by the tax state. This is entirely consistent with the broader progressive project, socialize resentment, demonize entrepreneurial gains, and condition the public to believe that any concentration of wealth outside the state is inherently illegitimate. Hayek saw this coming decades ago when he warned that central planning steadily erodes the scope for individual initiative, because the logical end of their ideology is a public that no longer dares to think in terms of independent ambition or long-term wealth building. Progressive leaders feed this mindset daily, insisting that “rigged” markets and “oligarchs” are the problem, while cleverly leaving the state, and its favored constituencies, as the only acceptable repositories of power and resources. Their reaction to SpaceX is a case study in this pathology. A company that has slashed launch costs, expanded human access to space, and built critical strategic infrastructure is reduced in their rhetoric to a symbol of “inequality” and “greed,” precisely because it exposes how much more effective decentralized, risk-taking capital can be than bureaucratic planning. The message encoded in their fury is clear, do not build, do not risk, do not aspire, unless it is under the watchful, confiscatory eye of the state. $SPCX

This is an amazingly written piece. Notice I didn't say it was a good piece, I said it was amazingly written. Do you remember that scene from "My cousin Vinny?" Where they're talking to the two kids in custody, and Vinny is explaining how he's going to win the case? -- He's going to show you the bricks. He'll show you they got straight sides. He'll show you how they got the right shape. He'll show them to you in a very special way, so that they appear to have everything a brick should have. But there's one thing he's not gonna show you. [turns the card, so that its edge is toward Billy] When you look at the bricks from the right angle, they're as thin as this playing card. His whole case is an illusion, a magic trick. It has to be an illusion. Nobody - I mean nobody - pulls the wool over the eyes of a Gambini. ESPECIALLY this one. --- The mother Jones showed you a bunch of bricks. A bunch of cases of self-defense claims involving white and black people. What they don't show you is the edge of the card, that all of these cases might involve self-defense claims, but the actual evidence is all different. Trayvon Martin wasn't in any danger but he assaulted someone by slamming their head into the pavement. Calling Jordan Neely "innocent" is a stretch. The guy was having some kind of psychotic episode screaming And yelling about how he was going to hurt people. Quoting tariq nasheed, one of the worst race grifters on social media is about as responsible as quoting the my pillow guy on facts regarding election integrity. Comparing the case to Kyle Rittenhouse is also hilarious, because Rittenhouse was assaulted, by white people. As soon as you take a look at the arguments in this mother Jones article, the cards they present are just as thin as a deck of playing cards, and not bricks at all.

🚨 Friedberg on Los Angeles ‘Elections’ “Your rights to have an election are gone. You are a citizen of those who tell you who your overseers are … So enjoy the ones that have been made appointed by those who have constructed the matrix.”

A righteous rant. 🔥🎯 I like the cut of her jib and would sail with her any day. The sun is shining, people. The winds are favorable and we’ve dealt with pirates & navigated together around storms before. Just don’t let maniacs steer our boat.

Je vais partir du principe que tu es de bonne foi, parce que ton raisonnement est intuitif et que 90% des gens le partagent. Mais il repose sur trois erreurs factuelles, et ça vaut le coup de les regarder calmement. Erreur 1 : la fortune d'Elon n'est pas un tas d'argent. C'est de la propriété d'usines, de fusées et de satellites. "Prendre la moitié de sa tune", concrètement, ça veut dire forcer la vente de la moitié de SpaceX et Tesla. L'argent ne sort pas d'un coffre, il sort des entreprises elles-mêmes, qui passent sous contrôle de fonds étrangers ou d'États. Tu ne redistribues pas du cash, tu démantèles un outil de production. C'est la différence entre récolter des pommes et découper le pommier. Erreur 2 : "ça résout énormément de problèmes dans le monde". Cette expérience a déjà été tentée, en vrai. En 2021, le directeur du Programme Alimentaire Mondial de l'ONU a affirmé que 6 milliards de Musk pouvaient "résoudre la faim dans le monde". Réponse d'Elon : décrivez-moi exactement comment, comptabilité publique à l'appui, et je vends mes actions Tesla immédiatement. Le PAM a publié son plan. Verdict : ce n'était pas "résoudre la faim", c'était nourrir 42 millions de personnes pendant un an. Un an. Puis il faut re-payer, pour toujours. Le PAM avait d'ailleurs levé 8,4 milliards l'année précédente, et la faim était toujours là. Les ONG traitent les symptômes en boucle, jamais les causes, parce que leur financement dépend de l'existence du problème. Erreur 3, la plus importante : tu cherches ce qui sort vraiment les gens de la pauvreté. Bonne nouvelle, on a la réponse, et elle est massive. En 1990, 36% de l'humanité vivait dans l'extrême pauvreté. Aujourd'hui, moins de 9%. Plus d'un milliard de personnes sorties de la misère en 30 ans. Par quoi ? Pas par la charité ni par l'aide internationale (plus de 1 000 milliards versés à l'Afrique en 60 ans pour un résultat à peu près nul). Par l'ouverture des marchés, l'industrialisation, le commerce. La Chine seule a sorti 800 millions de personnes de la pauvreté en abandonnant le collectivisme, pas en taxant ses entrepreneurs. Donc fais le calcul complet. Option A : tu confisques 500 milliards, tu finances quelques années de programmes, l'argent est consommé, et tu as détruit la machine qui produisait les fusées, les voitures électriques et l'internet des zones rurales. Option B : tu laisses le meilleur allocateur de capital de sa génération réinvestir 100% de sa fortune dans des industries qui baissent les coûts pour tout le monde et emploient des centaines de milliers de personnes. L'option A soulage ta morale pendant 18 mois. L'option B sort des populations entières de la pauvreté pour toujours. La pauvreté ne se redistribue pas. Elle se résout par la création. C'est contre-intuitif, c'est frustrant, mais c'est ce que disent 200 ans de données.

OK... take my money

LinkedIn, X, Instagram, Reddit