$OIH $RIG $VAL $NE $SDRL
Further thoughts / clarification on offshore drillers.
I've been on hols & only just listened to the
$NE call. The rather more cautious / conservative tone was quite striking - listening to it straight after today's
$RIG call, as I did. But as
@freakmaster222 pointed out in reply to my quoted post (linked again below) - even since
$NE call last week new multi year unexpected tender/s have been announced.
One does have to be careful about incentives of management to be overly positive - esp immediately after engaging in major corporate activity (i.e.
$RIG).
But the other key factor - which
$NE's CEO Robert Eifler pointed out - is that one needs a constructive view of future oil price in order to believe a strong & durable inflection in day rates is coming.
There has been a lot of back and forth on here about oil price vs. other commods - and especially gold / silver. Do the historical ratios hold - or is it different this time and oil will remain permanently cheap (strongest proponent Doomberg)?
Even those who think gold will move strongly higher and oil will catch up - often say 'eventually' (e.g.
@LukeGromen).
My view is the long term historical ratios will hold because everything real is linked / eventually subject to the laws of arbitrage. (I think) this is also basically Gromen's position - but I disagree with him strongly that one can have any confidence about when that mean reversion might happen. I have noticed a repeated pattern in the markets (and life more generally): the big changes happen in a highly non-linear fashion - and usually in a way that is counter-consensus.
So, I am very constructive on future oil price and think the old ratios will hold - which probably means most people will end up profoundly shocked where the oil price ends up. Just like happened to gold / silver after many years of contemptuous 'gold / silver bugs at it again' commentary: the naysayers were right until they were suddenly very wrong.
So, this is a key part of my belief in the offshore thesis (that I've held since first invested in 2021). We've had the scrapping, consolidation (the least expected and most bullish version:
$RIG taking over
$VAL), effective death of energy transition & beginnings of real concern about reserve replacement. But I think we're still missing what will really turbocharge the stocks: a big upward move in oil price and total shift from consensus of oversupply to scarcity.
This is why I suspect
$NE's management is prob too conservative (for understandable reasons) on day rate progression: I think when it comes it will come fast & hard and surprise all the analysts. Just like it did in the post covid 2-2.5x in day rates in 3 years. But I have no idea when - just that however it happens it will very likely be counter-consensus.
Final clarification: whilst I am very bullish medium term for the offshore driller stocks, they have had a terrific run since April 2025 Trump Dump - and esp year to date and since announcement of
$RIG /
$VAL takeover.
I have held very large (for me) positions all the way through the brutal recent cycle lull trough (so I'm not that smart!!) - and added / rotated back into them from my PM exposure last year. But I am not a buyer at these levels - except possibly for
$SDRL - which has lagged sector significantly over 1 month, YTD, 6 months and 1 year.
The offshore drillers are one of most visible and fungible industries (one of reasons I invested) - and I have noted a repeated pattern of them going into and out of favour because 'narrative of day' - that regularly rotates / changes.
$VAL was the laggard in December 2024,
$RIG dumped on fears it would buy
$SDRL for stock when its stock was weak,
$SDRL was strongest on takeover rumours at same time.
$NE was in favour around / after Trump Dump, then it lagged most - and now
$RIG /
$VAL are the darlings and
$SDRL is written off as left on shelf.
I have rotated some of my
$VAL profits into
$SDRL as the
$RIG /
$VAL takeover is extremely positive for the whole industry. And in fact you could argue most positive for the weakest of remaining players - as they will benefit most from overall improved price / contracting discipline.
I have often read you should examine each stock in your portfolio with fresh eyes every day and if you would not buy it at current price - it is therefore a sell. It is my very strong view this is total garbage promoted by armchair investors / commentators: there should be a very wide area between the definite buy and definite sell prices - because real life is messy and very uncertain. How else could you possibly buy & hold a big long term winner? Which in my view should be the primary goal of every investor.
So, I'm not a buyer of sector - but I am a firm holder.