Introducing Fibre: 1Tb/s of blockspace

NEO The Home Robot Order Today

To investigate, we did a deep-dive on OP-Stack rollups. Our findings serve as a window into an industry-wide problem. Spam bots consume huge portions of gas across top rollups, while paying disproportionately low fees

i solemnly swear to only ‘research’ things that i can put into production 🙏

The best possible blockchain is something that is very simple at the baselayer but that can still verify ZKP/STARK proofs (but not much else). Glad we’re all finally coming around to that conclusion. Question is, who can get there first? I think we (bitcoiners) can!

TLDR - increases the cost to corrupt/sybil resistance, EigenDA's ETH quorum is one of the default two (ETH & EIGEN) which adds to the cost to corrupt that with the other quorums the blob was sent to (4.3M ETH / 1/3 = 1.43M ETH = ~$2.66B) EIGEN quorum. Disincentives be supplemented with Proofs of Custody slashing. ~~~~ Sure, in general these blockchains/distributed systems have the concept of a safety threshold. The safety threshold essentially refers to minimal threshold of participants in the network to be honest. For ETH or other blockchains secured by common consensus algorithm's (e.g. Cosmos's CometBFT) The network remains secure as long as at least 2/3 of validators (weighted by stake) are honest The inverse of this means controlling 1/3 of the network can lead to malicious or incorrect action. So.. 1/3 of the stake ~= the cost to corrupt the system or DA network in this case. EigenDA structure roughly looks like this - All validators have stake to participate in EigenDA and opt into quorums, min is 32 ETH in the ETH quorum - Data is sharded across the network of validators - Validators validate, store data and send signatures back - Once a sufficient threshold (above this safety threshold across ALL quorums) you have an attestation the data is stored and will be stored So for EigenDA this means the safety threshold is ETH Quorum - 4.3M ETH * 1/3 = 1.43M ETH ~$2.66B (@ $2,000 ETH) - EIGEN quorum value so essentially you'd require >$2.66B to corrupt the ETH quorum on EigenDA. If we add Proof of Custody slashing that would be an increased disincentive. So when we refer to economic security we often blend in discussing properties we want to protect like this safety threshold. Hope that gives you a bit of detail on how EigenDA and others work with economic security.

premium DA thesis: using native means synchronous composability and native execution, which means Ethereum can charge a small minimum base fee on blobs then we crank capacity (more blobs than Celestia remember) and Ethereum rebundles all the things

Canonically will route through hub.

Don't trust, verify. Announcing the first-ever in-browser ZK rollup light node, with @succinctlabs and @celestia underneath ✨. Open prism.rs to start directly verifying the network— providing security to you, @celestia, and @prism_xyz.