Under the pretext of banning under-16s from social media to “protect the children,” Keir Starmer has snuck in some small print that should make Americans really glad that all the tea was dumped into the Boston harbour back in 1773. Adults will still be “allowed” to use the platforms… once they’ve handed over facial recognition, digital ID, passport, or credit card details to prove they’re not a child. So it was never really about the kids. It was about making sure every single person who wants to speak online has to first tell the government exactly who they are. Step 1: Link your real identity to your speech Step 2: police have a lovely searchable database of every spicy take, meme, or complaint you’ve ever posted Step 3: bring in the consequences - arrests, travel ban, debunking, for out-of-bounds speech The UK is in a free fall.

HORRIFYING: Yasmeen Khan, owner of a beauty salon, offered free courses to young Christian and Hindu women to lure them in. Once there, she drugged their drinks. When they lost consciousness, she called her husband Mohammed Khan, who raped them while she stood watch at the entrance. They recorded the abuses to blackmail them and force them to have relations with more Muslim men. When questioned, Yasmeen justified the crimes by saying that helping to rape "infidel girls" would lead her to Paradise. This is Islam.

elon could solve world hunger literally this second all he has to do is full stack dump all his shares, cause a stock market recession, wipe out trillions, delete tens of thousands of jobs, and then he'll be able to fund the federal government for about 18 minutes

Ugh. This is DISGUSTING @LushLtd. Teenage girls love to shop in your stores and here you are happily encouraging them to CUT OFF THEIR HEALTHY BREASTS in the name of trans pride. This is beyond repulsive. It's dangerous and sick. No parent should allow their child near your stores. Please share: #BoycottLushNow

The plan of Marxist leaders: 1. Ensure that schools do not properly teach economics. 2. Create envy in the minds of economically illiterate citizens by asserting that there is a limited pie of national wealth and some people have too much of that pie. 3. Appoint themselves as the arbiters of wealth distribution and rely on the envy of the economically illiterate masses to achieve power. 4. Use that power to ensure that everyone is equally poor, except them of course because they deserve disproportionate wealth because of all the "responsibility" they shoulder. 5. Build that party dacha on the Volga River and eat caviar. 6. Profit. _________________________ With respect to @elonmusk they are somewhere between steps #2 and #3.

Can we debunk this nonsense? Elon Musk was awarded (note: not given) cost-per-result contracts to perform a service for the US government. The total of those for SpaceX specifically is ~$22B, which includes repaid loans, state tax incentives, etc. The deal was simple: put stuff into LEO at or below a set cost. If SpaceX does it below the set cost, SpaceX keeps the difference. If it doesn’t, the company is responsible for the overrun. End result? SpaceX & Elon lowered the cost of getting 1 kg into LEO by 95-97% vs what NASA was paying previously. And for the record, every other company around at the time was offered the same opportunity to bid on the contract - Musk/SpaceX just took it. The handout narrative implies the taxpayer is the patron and SpaceX the dependent. The cost data shows the opposite: before SpaceX, NASA paid Russia’s Soyuz $80-86M per seat; SpaceX delivered at ~$55 million. SpaceX saved the US taxpayer $300M-$465M each year on that alone (the US sends 12-15 astronauts to space each year) On the lunar lander, NASA estimated SpaceX’s fixed-price bid saved $20B-$30B vs the Boeing-preferred cost-plus approach. So: SpaceX saved the US taxpayer more than the total value of contracts it earned on a single project, PLUS provided the US government with the requested services (put stuff in LEO) at the best possible price.

Handled @elonmusk at @BedBathBeyond … please send ticket to space at intern@beyond.com

Shane Dawson has a history of pedophilic behavior. Yet, he and his partner were allowed to buy children via IVF and surrogacy. In 2014, Shane referred to a 6-year-old girl as “sexy.” In 2018, Shane admitted to searching for child pornography. In 2020, a clip of Shane resurfaced showing him pretending to masturbate to a poster of 11-year-old Willow Smith. Video footage shows Shane coercing a 12-year-old girl into doing a lap dance on someone else while playing a sexually explicit song in the background and telling her to eat a “cocktail weenie” because he has “a lot of child molesters watching.” In another video, Shane placed a pair of large fake breasts on a 12-year-old girl and made inappropriate requests and comments, including: telling a dog to lick the fake breasts, asking the girl inappropriate questions about her genitals, forcing her to dance on top of a table, and more… Despite all these facts (caught on video), Shane and his partner, Ryland Adams, were able to use IVF and surrogacy to obtain children. In February 2023, Shane and Ryland announced they had purchased a woman’s eggs and hired a surrogate to create 12 children, 6 girls & 6 boys. On December 7th, 2023, they announced the birth of twin boys, Jet & Max. These twin boys are precious. Their existence is good. But they (and their 10 other siblings) are victims of a grave human rights abuse. Children are not commodities to be recklessly created, intentionally deprived of their mother, and purchased by anyone who has the money to do so—especially someone who has exhibited pedophilic behavior. We must protect children. We must ban IVF and surrogacy.

EVEN EVEN MORE HILLARY In the summer of 1997, Bill Clinton visited Denmark. We landed on AF-1 in Copenhagen, boarded Marine One for a night time tour of the coast en route to Kronborg Castle, for Shakespeare the “home of Hamlet.” We landed at around midnight and were welcomed with open arms by the queen and her staff. Beautiful, historic castle. I was put up in the Scottish Military suite. Beautiful room with a fully appointed spread of meats, cheeses, breads, fruit, and a full bar. All served, of course, with fine china and crystal. After a phone call with my wife, I made sure POTUS was down for the evening and went to bed. The next morning, the queen had a breakfast spread for Clinton and the staff. Again, first class. As we headed to the motorcade to leave for an event and the flight home, I was pulled aside by the Danish military aide. “Buzz, we have a problem. Your staff stole the china and crystal from their rooms. And took other things as well.” I was stunned and chagrined. I apologized profusely and told him I’d handle it. I talked with Hillary and the White House chief of staff and told them what had happened. They both shrugged their shoulders. No apology. Nobody held accountable. No repayment. Just another day in the Clinton White House and a group of Ugly Americans. I don’t want to hear a damn word from @HillaryClinton about White House decorum. Not a word.

The thing that isn’t happening happened again.

So let me get this straight: Leftists want 16 year olds to vote. They want 12 year olds to be able to consent to sex changes. But they don’t want those same teenagers to read conservative opinions on social media, only Blue Sky? Their agenda is pretty obvious.

“That is called trauma,” transgender therapist Carson Eckard told my confused daughter when she expressed fear that I might come to the campus of Rider University. In October, it will be two years since Ilene took her life. Trauma. It is a word therapists use so often when gender-confused children speak about parents who question or oppose their new identity. Trauma. A word that now haunts me. And sometimes I wonder whether Carson Eckard truly understands what trauma means. I am talking about the trauma many parents experience in this country when their children are pulled away from them by a combination of therapists, schools, peers, transgender activists, pastors, and even state involvement. Does Carson Eckard know what it feels like when Mother’s Day comes and the daughter you love with all your heart doesn’t call to wish you a Happy Mother’s Day? Does Carson Eckard know what it feels like when DCF shows up at your door because a transgender pastor filed a complaint against you despite never having met you and having met your daughter only once? Does Carson Eckard know what it feels like when a university you trusted with your child’s education and safety labels you “unsafe” and bars you from its campus? Does Carson Eckard know what it feels like when your child’s birthday arrives and you are unable to spend it with her? Does Carson Eckard know what it feels like when police knock on your door and tell you that your child is dead—and that her body lay alone in a dorm room for four days while the university was celebrating National Coming Out Day? Does Carson Eckard know what it feels like to stand beside your daughter’s casket and see her lying there, motionless, knowing that every hope, every dream, every plan you had for her future has come to an end? Does Carson Eckard know what it feels like to watch that casket slowly lowered into the ground, knowing that this is the last time you will ever be physically close to your child? That is trauma. The sleepless nights. The unanswered messages. The fear. The helplessness. The grief. The years of wondering whether there was something more you could have done. Yet I suspect Carson Eckard would not describe what I feel as trauma, despite being a licensed therapist. To Carson Eckard, trauma was my daughter’s belief that something was wrong with her body and my refusal to affirm that belief. But what would Carson Eckard call what I have lived through? What would Carson Eckard call what countless other parents are living through right now? If losing your child while she is still alive is not trauma, and losing her forever is not trauma, then what is?

History will remember Elon Musk alongside DaVinci, Gutenberg, Fulton, Pasteur, Edison, Ford and Jobs. History will have no recollection of any kind of Ro Khanna.

Alex Soros is interesting because he’s a billionaire heir who dedicates his life to making cities less safe. He’s like a Reverse Batman.

Democrats and the media no longer believe women and girls should get to consent. No consent in who touches our bodies. No consent in who puts their fingers in us. No consent in who we share intimate spaces with. History will remember your betrayal.

The fear is caused by the complete lack of respect for British traditions and values

i’m not stuck in line behind Elon Musk at walmart listening to him lose his mind cause he can’t put Zyns on an EBT card.

Commies in the luxury box, feasting on capitalism. The irony writes itself.

Los musulmanes de toda Europa están conmocionados tras la histórica y valiente decisión de Suecia: dejará de usar el término «islamofobia», acuñado por los Hermanos Musulmanes, por considerarlo un concepto manipulado políticamente para silenciar las críticas al islam. La ministra de Asuntos Exteriores sueca, Maria Malmer Stenergard, anunció que su gobierno presionará a la Unión Europea y a las Naciones Unidas para que dejen de usar este término fraudulento. El concepto de «islamofobia» fue diseñado deliberadamente para equiparar la crítica legítima a la doctrina islámica con el racismo. Se utilizó como arma para silenciar el debate sobre textos islámicos fundamentales que contienen mandamientos para hacer la guerra, violar y someter a los no musulmanes. Suecia acaba de reconocer lo que millones de europeos ya saben: criticar una religión que abiertamente llama al asesinato y la esclavitud sexual de los no creyentes no es una fobia, sino sentido común y autoconservación. Esto supone un duro golpe para el lobby islamista en toda Europa. ¿Estás de acuerdo con la decisión de Suecia?

A man pretending to be a woman, suspected of murdering a little boy, publicly assaulted female journalists. Naturally Australian media referred to him as "she".