This is classic true-but-misleading by
@GabrielEpsteinX. Adult men are ALWAYS overrepresented in violent fatalities in war. If you look comparatively, you find the % of women and children among those killed in Gaza, close to ~50%, is the highest since the Rwandan Genocide.*
I mean, look at 7 October, which clearly involved deliberately killing of civilians. Adult men were considerably more represented in fatalities than they are in Gaza. Using those demographics to try to exonerate Hamas, or try to "prove" they didn't target civilians, is the same intellectual level as Gabriel has stooped to here, relying entirely on the ignorance of people about wartime fatalities patterns.
Why, by the way, are men so always overrepresented in wartime violent fatalities, even in cases (like 7 Oct, the "war" in Gaza, Second Intifada terrorist attacks by Palestinians, the Battle of Aleppo, etc) involving deliberately killing of civilians? It's not only because of male combatants being killed, although ofc that's a big factor. It's because militaries/militant groups have 'more access' to male civilians in war than women and children, as the former are more likely to be out and about and running risks - getting food and shelter for their families - than women and children are.
Meanwhile, low-information influencers - like
@Aizenberg55 ,
@SethAMandel,
@ElliotMalin,
@JewishWonk,
@CoreyWriting,
@nicolelampert,
@JacobALinker,
@robsatloff, etc - will share this chart, which illustrates the most women-and-child heavy violent fatalities demographics since the Rwandan Genocide* (and heavier than 7 Oct), to proclaim it exonerates Israel. That's the whole point of Gabriel's (deliberately misleading) presentation.
* I'm excluding conflicts where fewer than 100 people were killed.