Fmr. NIH Director Francis Collins deliberately scrubbed Fauci’s name from the infamous Proximal Origins paper because of Fauci’s glaring conflict of interest. Nature Medicine (the publisher) offered no condemnation or scrutiny of the ethics. These COVID investigations matter because they expose protectionism within the scientific community that breeds gatekeeping. It's suppressing research, stifling innovation, destroying objectivity, & eroding public trust.

Weeks later, that same group of concerned scientists would publish the Proximal Origin shutting down debate that COVID-19 could have come from a lab. In an internal email, NIH Director Francis Collins notes that he and Fauci helped with the paper “but are appropriately not mentioned."

Doing a quick search of "ecohealth repel" shows a github repository. also a eha bio page of a guy that worked on repel and also something called wabnet.org/

This pervasive pattern, over long periods of time and involving multiple scientists, speaks to a cutrural issue within the virology research community. Biosafety and biosecurity must be the foundation of any further work. Thank you Senator Paul for making this important investigative work public.

The article treats this board as if it were a council of indispensable scientific giants. Nowhere does it explain who these people are, what they accomplished on the board, or why replacing them is supposed to be a national crisis. Many appear to be career bureaucrats.

No one should be able to order a bioweapon through the mail. @IFP & @JoinFAI are proud to co-lead an open letter calling for mandatory DNA synthesis screening & recordkeeping. Signatories include: - Sam Altman, CEO & Co-Founder, OpenAI - Dario Amodei, CEO & Co-Founder, Anthropic - David Baker, Director, Institute for Protein Design; 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry recipient - Patrick Collison, CEO & Co-Founder, Stripe - Paul Graham, Founder, Y Combinator - Demis Hassabis, CEO, Google DeepMind; 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry recipient - Emily Leproust, CEO & Co-Founder, Twist Bioscience - Lawrence Lessig, Roy L. Furman Professor of Law and Leadership, Harvard Law School - Gerald W. Parker, former Special Assistant to the President for Biosecurity and Pandemic Response - Mustafa Suleyman, CEO, Microsoft AI - Alex Tabarrok, Professor of Economics, George Mason University - Alexandr Wang, Chief AI Officer, Meta; Founder, Scale AI - Christine E. Wormuth, President & CEO, Nuclear Threat Initiative; 25th Secretary of the Army Read the letter and see the full list of signatories: screendna.org Many DNA synthesis companies voluntarily screen orders to mitigate biosecurity risks, but no law requires them to do so. Leaders in AI, biotech, life sciences, national security, and the nucleic acid synthesis industry agree that Congress should act to strengthen safeguards against biological threats. @deanwball put it well in the WSJ: “If you’re synthesizing the stuff that yields biological life and viruses, we’re asking you to screen to see whether it is dangerous in some way. That seems like a reasonable thing for society to insist upon.”

Two scientists at a U.S. government lab have been charged with smuggling vials of deactivated mpox virus into the country from Africa without permits and lying about it to investigators. apnews.com/article/scientist…

21/5/26 - FACTORY OF DEATH: ERASMUS MC ROTTERDAM, THE NETHERLANDS 🧵 1/…. Micha Kat – Brazil 🇧🇷 On one of the last days of 2012 a remarkable piece appeared in the Algemeen Dagblad, one of the biggest newspapers in The Netherlands. The headlines were the most strange and sinister the world has ever seen: In the USA I was compared with Adolf Hitler and How a big step forward in combating bird flu became a nightmare. What was going on here? In this piece we will disclose the biggest secret in the world’s history of scientific research: how a team of virologists at a university in The Netherlands under the veil of ‘scientific progress’ built viruses with the explicit aim to reduce the worlds population. The article is basically an interview with prominent Dutch virologist Ron Fouchier. It was the first interview ever published with this Erasmus MC virologist in The Netherlands and the occasion was exactly as sinister as the headlines suggested: Fouchier and his team succeeded in ‘upgrading’ the avian flu-virus H5N1 (the most deadly variant) to being ‘airborne’ and thus transmissible from human to human. They achieved this by transposing this feature (being airborne) from avian flu-virus N7H7 to H5N1, thus creating what in essence is a bioweapon. But this b-word was not in the article. Nor was explained to the Dutch public what was the real significance of this piece of why it was published in the first place. We will reveal this now, 14 years later for the first time: the interview was the deep state-celebration of the first successful gain of function-operation in the world that opened the gates to the construction of a series of weaponized viruses that since made world headlines: MERS, Covid 19, Monkeypox, Ebola, Hanta. SARS is not mentioned because Fouchier and his team worked on upgrading that virus the year before but could not achieve the crucial gain of function-breakthrough. ‘When the gain of function was realised at last, we celebrated by throwing a box of beer on the table’ says Ron Fouchier in the interview. But the reporter of the Algemeen Dagblad faced a peculiar, never-seen-before and unsolvable journalistic problem: how to ‘repack’ a scientific breakthrough to kill the world’s population as something ‘good’ or at least, if that would not be possible, as something that appeared legit of, if that would also be a bridge too far, as something that would not raise suspicions and maybe even lead to the arrest of mr Fouchier and his team? One of the main strategies that is applied is situations like this is: paint the perpetrator as a victim. And that is exactly what the journalist did. ‘I was compared to Hitler’ lamented Fouchier. ‘My daughter was harassed at school’, ‘We needed police protection round our premises’, ‘I received death threads’. Why would all these terrible things have happened if mr Fouchier did something for the benefit of the world? Amidst all the spins and framings the journalist still could not let go of this paramount question: why did you do it? What are the benefits? Fouchier was unable to answer. The journalist scribbled these words on her notepad: We acted out of honest motives only.

Is the Gain-of-Function Cabal finally unraveling? Congratulations and thank you to everyone involved in detecting the smuggled monkeypox and arresting those responsible. A thorough investigation is necessary to identify all co-conspirators and prosecute them to the full extent of the law. justice.gov/usao-edmi/pr/fed…